SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2009 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4

The phylogenetic relationship between populations of marginally and sympatrically located Pinus halepensis Mill. and Pinus brutia Ten. in Turkey, based on the ITS-2 region

C. Özge TOZKAR
Sertaç ÖNDE
Zeki KAYA
Pages
363–373
Publication Date
2009-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Estimated FST values indicated that Turkish red pine and Aleppo pine were highly differentiated in Muğla province due to possible reproductive isolation, while the 2 species shared a more common genetic background due to possible natural hybridization in Adana province.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia) is a widespread and important forest tree species in Turkey, occurring mainly in southern, western, and northwestern Turkey, while the natural occurrence of Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis) is restricted to 2 locations and is found sympatrically with Turkish red pine.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the present study sympatric populations of both species from Muğla and Adana provinces in Turkey were sampled, and the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS-2) region of ribosomal DNA was comparatively studied with sequence analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Estimated FST values indicated that Turkish red pine and Aleppo pine were highly differentiated in Muğla province due to possible reproductive isolation, while the 2 species shared a more common genetic background due to possible natural hybridization in Adana province.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Turkish red pine · Aleppo pine · ITS region

Abstract

Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia) is a widespread and important forest tree species in Turkey, occurring mainly in southern, western, and northwestern Turkey, while the natural occurrence of Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis) is restricted to 2 locations and is found sympatrically with Turkish red pine. In the present study sympatric populations of both species from Muğla and Adana provinces in Turkey were sampled, and the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS-2) region of ribosomal DNA was comparatively studied with sequence analysis. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) demonstrated 100% of total molecular variation between the species in Muğla province, versus only 50.65% in Adana province. Construction of a phylogenetic tree with a bootstrap value of 92% revealed that Aleppo pine and Turkish red pine samples at the species level were well separated. Estimated FST values indicated that Turkish red pine and Aleppo pine were highly differentiated in Muğla province due to possible reproductive isolation, while the 2 species shared a more common genetic background due to possible natural hybridization in Adana province.

Özet

Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia) is a widespread and important forest tree species in Turkey, occurring mainly in southern, western, and northwestern Turkey, while the natural occurrence of Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis) is restricted to 2 locations and is found sympatrically with Turkish red pine. In the present study sympatric populations of both species from Muğla and Adana provinces in Turkey were sampled, and the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS-2) region of ribosomal DNA was comparatively studied with sequence analysis. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) demonstrated 100% of total molecular variation between the species in Muğla province, versus only 50.65% in Adana province. Construction of a phylogenetic tree with a bootstrap value of 92% revealed that Aleppo pine and Turkish red pine samples at the species level were well separated. Estimated FST values indicated that Turkish red pine and Aleppo pine were highly differentiated in Muğla province due to possible reproductive isolation, while the 2 species shared a more common genetic background due to possible natural hybridization in Adana province.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOZKAR, C. Ö., ÖNDE, S., KAYA, Z. (2009). The phylogenetic relationship between populations of marginally and sympatrically located Pinus halepensis Mill. and Pinus brutia Ten. in Turkey, based on the ITS-2 region. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4, 363–373. https://ajindex.com/articles/179812

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acar, I. 1993. Genetic structure of P. brutia forests. In: Uluslararası Kızılçam Sempozyumu (18-23 Ekim 1993, Marmaris), Orman Bakanlığı Yayını, pp. 228-234,
  2. Ankara.
  3. Arbez, M. 1974. Distribution, ecology and variation in Pinus brutia in Turkey. FAO For. Occas. paper, For. Genetic Resour. Info. 3: 21- 33. Atalay, I. 1982. A general survey of the vegetation of northeastern Anatolia. Ege Coğrafya Dergisi (Aegean Geographical Journal) 1: 14-39.
  4. Baldwin, B.G., M.J. Sanderson, J.M. Porter, M.F. Wojciechowski, J.S. Campbell and M.J. Donoghue. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 82: 247- 277. Bruns, T.D., T.J. White and J.W. Taylor. 1991. Fungal molecular systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22: 525-564.
  5. Buckler, IV ES. and T.P. Holtsford. 1996. Zea systematics ribosomal ITS evidence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 612-622.
  6. Critchfieldt, W.B. and E.L. Jr. Little. 1966. Geographic distribution of the pines of the world. U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Miscellaneous Pub. 991. 97 pp. Conkle, M.T., G. Schiller and C. Grunwald. 1988. Electrophoretic analysis of diversity and phylogeny of Pinus brutia and closely related taxa. Systematic Bot. 13: 411-424.
  7. Davis, P.H. 1965. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Volume 1, Edinburgh University Press, UK, pp. 74. Dellaporta, S.L., J. Wood and J.B. Hicks. 1983. A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1: 19-21. Devlet Planlama Teşlilatı. 2001. The structure and features of Forestry Sector in Turkey. Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, Ormancılık Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, DPT Yayın No. 2531- OİK: 547, pp. 1-26,
  8. Ankara.
  9. Duffield, J.W. 1952. Relationship and species hybridization in the genus Pinus. Zeitschrift für Forstgenetik. 1: 93-97. Erdoğan,V. and S.A. Mehlenbacher. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of Corylus species (Betulaceae) based on Nuclear Ribosomal DNA ITS region and Chloroplast matK gene sequences. Systematic Botany. 25: 727-737.
  10. Frankis, M.P. 1993. Morphology and Affinities of Pinus brutia. In: Uluslararası Kızılçam Sempozyumu (18-23 Ekim 1993, Marmaris), Orman Bakanlığı Yayını, pp.11-18,
  11. Ankara.
  12. Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. (2000) - (Cited 2006 November 25); Available from: http://www.genecodes.com.
  13. Gernandt, D.S., A. Liston and D. Pinaro. 2001. Variation of the nrDNA ITS of Pinus subsection Cembroides: implications for molecular systematic studies of pine species complexes. M