Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2006 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 5

A Comparison of the Development Times of Trissolcus rufiventris (Mayr) and Trissolcus simoni Mayr (Hym.: Scelionidae) at Three Constant Temperatures

Pages
383–386
Publication Date
2006-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that T. rufiventris has an advantage in the biological control of Eurygaster integriceps Put. (Het.: Scutelleridae).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The effects of temperature on the development of the egg parasitoids Trissolcus rufiventris (Mayr) and Trissolcus simoni Mayr (Hym.: Scelionidae) were determined at 3 constant temperatures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Female development ranged from 6.9 days at 32 °C to 22.5 days at 20 °C for T. rufiventris, and from 9.2 days at 32 °C to 24.7 days at 20 °C for T. simoni.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that T. rufiventris has an advantage in the biological control of Eurygaster integriceps Put. (Het.: Scutelleridae).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Eurygaster integriceps · Trissolcus simoni · Trissolcus rufiventris

Abstract

The effects of temperature on the development of the egg parasitoids Trissolcus rufiventris (Mayr) and Trissolcus simoni Mayr (Hym.: Scelionidae) were determined at 3 constant temperatures. Female development ranged from 6.9 days at 32 °C to 22.5 days at 20 °C for T. rufiventris, and from 9.2 days at 32 °C to 24.7 days at 20 °C for T. simoni. The average development time of males was shorter than that of females for each parasitoid species. The development of female T. rufiventris required 125.0 degree-days above the theoretical threshold of 15.5 °C and that of males required 111.1 degree-days above 15.3 °C. The lower threshold temperature and thermal requirement of T. simoni were estimated as 12.5 °C and 166.7 degree-days for females and 12.0 °C and 166.7 degree-days for males. The immature stages of T. rufiventris developed faster than those of T. simoni. It was concluded that T. rufiventris has an advantage in the biological control of Eurygaster integriceps Put. (Het.: Scutelleridae).

Özet

The effects of temperature on the development of the egg parasitoids Trissolcus rufiventris (Mayr) and Trissolcus simoni Mayr (Hym.: Scelionidae) were determined at 3 constant temperatures. Female development ranged from 6.9 days at 32 °C to 22.5 days at 20 °C for T. rufiventris, and from 9.2 days at 32 °C to 24.7 days at 20 °C for T. simoni. The average development time of males was shorter than that of females for each parasitoid species. The development of female T. rufiventris required 125.0 degree-days above the theoretical threshold of 15.5 °C and that of males required 111.1 degree-days above 15.3 °C. The lower threshold temperature and thermal requirement of T. simoni were estimated as 12.5 °C and 166.7 degree-days for females and 12.0 °C and 166.7 degree-days for males. The immature stages of T. rufiventris developed faster than those of T. simoni. It was concluded that T. rufiventris has an advantage in the biological control of Eurygaster integriceps Put. (Het.: Scutelleridae).

🔖

Cite This Article

KIVAN, M., KILIÇ, N. (2006). A Comparison of the Development Times of Trissolcus rufiventris (Mayr) and Trissolcus simoni Mayr (Hym.: Scelionidae) at Three Constant Temperatures. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 5, 383–386. https://ajindex.com/articles/179810

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Açıkgöz, N., M.E. Akaş, A. Moghaddam and K. Özcan. 1994. PC’ler için veritabanı esaslı Türkçe istatistik paketi: TARİST. In: Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, E.Ü.Z.F. Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, İzmir, pp. 264-267.
  2. Aswan, M.S., L.T. Wilson and M.P. Hoffman. 1989. Comparative biology of three geographic populations of Trissolcus basalis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Environ. Ento. 19: 387-392.
  3. Awadalla, S.S. 1996. Influence of temperature and age of Nezara viridula L. eggs on the scelionid egg parasitoid, Trissolcus megallocephalus (Ashm.) (Hym., Scelionidae). J. Appl. Ent. 12: 445-448.
  4. Cividanes, F.J. and J.G. Figueiredo. 1996. Development and emergence of Trissolcus brochymenae (Ashmead) and Telenomus podisi Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) at different temperatures. An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil 25: 207-211.
  5. Correa-Ferreira, B.S. and C.E.O. Zamataro. 1989. Reproductive capacity and longevity of the egg parasitoids Trissolcus basalis (Wollaston) and Trissolcus mitsukurii Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 49: 621-626.
  6. Doğanlar, M. 1998. Mass rearing of egg parasitoids of sunn pest (Eurygaster austriaca Put.). In: Integrated Sunn Pest Control (Ed., K. Melan and C. Lomer). Plant Protection Central Research Institute, Ankara, pp. 89-94.
  7. Doutt, R.L, D.P. Annecke and E. Tremblay. 1976. Biology and host relationships in parasitoids, pp. 143-168. In: Theory and practice of biological control. (Eds.: C.B. Huffaker and P.S. Messenger), Academic Press, New York, pp. 143-168.
  8. James, D.G. and G.N. Warren. 1991. Effect of temperature on development, survival, longevity and fecundity of Trissolcus oenone Dodd (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). J. Aus. Ent. Soc. 30: 303-306.
  9. Kıvan, M. and N. Kılıç. 2002. Host preference: parasitism, emergence and development of Trissolcus semistriatus (Hym., Scelionidae) in various host eggs. J. Appl. Ent. 126: 395-399.
  10. Koçak, E. and N. Kılınçer. 2001. Turkiye Sune [Eurygaster spp. (Het.: Scutelleridae)] yumurta parazitoidi Trissolcus (Hym.: Scelionidae) turleri. Bitki Koruma Bülteni 41: 167-181.
  11. Lodos, N. 1982. Türkiye Entomolojisi II (Genel, Uygulamali ve Faunistik). 591 s. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yay. No. 429, Bornova, İzmir.
  12. Orr, D.B., D.J. Boethel and W.A. Jones. 1985. Development and emergence of Telenomus chloropus and Trissolcus basalis Stink (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) at various temperatures and relative humidities. Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 78: 615-619.
  13. Öncüer, C. and M. Kıvan. 1995. Tekirdağ ve çevresinde Eurygast