Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2009 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3

Effects of different irrigation programs on the growth, yield, and fruit quality of drip-irrigated melon

Pages
243–255
Publication Date
2009-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, irrigation water amounting to 319.6-331.1 mm was applied and 427.1-472.6 mm seasonal evapotranspiration and 8.9-9.2 kg m-3 water use efficiency was determined in the (ISr P75) irrigation program.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A field study was conducted in Ankara, a semi-arid region of Central Anatolia, Turkey, on clay-loamy soils in the vegetation seasons of 2005 and 2006.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Water amounting to 50% (P50), 75% (P75), and 100% (P100) of full irrigation water were applied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, irrigation water amounting to 319.6-331.1 mm was applied and 427.1-472.6 mm seasonal evapotranspiration and 8.9-9.2 kg m-3 water use efficiency was determined in the (ISr P75) irrigation program.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kırkağaç · melon · drip irrigation

Abstract

A field study was conducted in Ankara, a semi-arid region of Central Anatolia, Turkey, on clay-loamy soils in the vegetation seasons of 2005 and 2006. Kırkağaç melon cultivar (Cucumis melo L. cv. Kırkağaç) was irrigated by the drip method from transplantation to the beginning of the flowering (ISf), fruit setting (ISfs), ripening (ISr), and harvesting (ISh) periods. Water amounting to 50% (P50), 75% (P75), and 100% (P100) of full irrigation water were applied. Some analyses were carried out regarding the growth, yield, and fruit quality parameters in these irrigation programs. Moreover, the amount of water, the seasonal evapotranspiration, and the water use efficiency having been used were determined for each irrigation program. Carrying on the irrigation during the ripening period furthered shoot growth except P100 application, did not significantly affect fruit yield and the soluble solids content of the fruit flesh. Similar but relatively larger fruit size and heavier weight were found in the treatments of ISr and ISh. Fruit yields in the P75 and P100 applications were found similar, but they were found to be higher than the P50 application. The soluble solids contents and the ratings of sensory characteristics were higher in the P75 application. As a result of this study, with respect to the considerably high yield and fruit quality, it was suggested that irrigation be kept on going until the beginning of fruit setting, not during the ripening period, and the application of 75% of full irrigation water amount (ISr P75) is the most convenient irrigation program. In addition, irrigation water amounting to 319.6-331.1 mm was applied and 427.1-472.6 mm seasonal evapotranspiration and 8.9-9.2 kg m-3 water use efficiency was determined in the (ISr P75) irrigation program.

Özet

A field study was conducted in Ankara, a semi-arid region of Central Anatolia, Turkey, on clay-loamy soils in the vegetation seasons of 2005 and 2006. Kırkağaç melon cultivar (Cucumis melo L. cv. Kırkağaç) was irrigated by the drip method from transplantation to the beginning of the flowering (ISf), fruit setting (ISfs), ripening (ISr), and harvesting (ISh) periods. Water amounting to 50% (P50), 75% (P75), and 100% (P100) of full irrigation water were applied. Some analyses were carried out regarding the growth, yield, and fruit quality parameters in these irrigation programs. Moreover, the amount of water, the seasonal evapotranspiration, and the water use efficiency having been used were determined for each irrigation program. Carrying on the irrigation during the ripening period furthered shoot growth except P100 application, did not significantly affect fruit yield and the soluble solids content of the fruit flesh. Similar but relatively larger fruit size and heavier weight were found in the treatments of ISr and ISh. Fruit yields in the P75 and P100 applications were found similar, but they were found to be higher than the P50 application. The soluble solids contents and the ratings of sensory characteristics were higher in the P75 application. As a result of this study, with respect to the considerably high yield and fruit quality, it was suggested that irrigation be kept on going until the beginning of fruit setting, not during the ripening period, and the application of 75% of full irrigation water amount (ISr P75) is the most convenient irrigation program. In addition, irrigation water amounting to 319.6-331.1 mm was applied and 427.1-472.6 mm seasonal evapotranspiration and 8.9-9.2 kg m-3 water use efficiency was determined in the (ISr P75) irrigation program.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, O., HALLORAN, N., ÇAVUŞOĞLU, Ş., ŞENGÜL, N. (2009). Effects of different irrigation programs on the growth, yield, and fruit quality of drip-irrigated melon. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3, 243–255. https://ajindex.com/articles/179757

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alizadeh, K.A., J.M. Baghani, and G.M. Haghnia. 1999. Effect of deficit irrigation by drip and furrow systems on the yield and quality of melon at Mashad, Iran. In: 17th ICID Int. Congress on Irrig. and Drain., Vol. 1C, Granada-Spain, pp. 263-269.
  2. Amor, F.M. del, M. Carvajal, V. Martinez, A. Cerda, F.M. del Amor, and L.F.M. Marcelis. 1998. Response of muskmelon plants (Cucumis melo L.) to irrigation with saline water. In: Second Int. Symp. on Models for Plant Growth, Environmental Control and Farm Management in Protected Cultivation, Acta Hortic. 456: 263-268.
  3. Bhella, H.S. 1985. Muskmelon growth, yield and nutrition as influenced by planting method and trickle irrigation. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 26: 793-796.
  4. Bogle, C.R. and T.K. Hartz. 1986. Comparison of drip and furrow irrigation for muskmelon production. HortSci. 21:242-244.
  5. Coelho, E.F., V.F. de Sousa, B.H.N. Rodrigues, V.A.B. de Souza, C. Andrade, V.F. de Sousa, V.A.B. de Sousa, and C. de Andrade. 1999. Melon yield under different irrigation intervals and placement of drip lines in cohesive sandy soils. RBEAA 3: 309- 315. Dasgan, H.Y., C. Kirda, N. Baytorun, K. Abak, and S. Büyükalaca. 1999. Water and nitrogen relationships in fertigated greenhouse grown melon (Cucumis melo L.). In: Proceedings of the First Int. Symp. on Cucurbits, Adana, Turkey, Acta Hortic. 492: 233- 236. Faberio, C., F.M. Santa Olalla, and J.A. Juan. 2002. Production of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) under controlled deficit irrigation in a semi-arid climate. Agric. Water Manage. 54: 93- 105. Flocker, W.J., J.C. Lingle, R.M. Davis, and R.J. Miller. 1965. Influence of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on yield, quality and size of cantaloupes. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 86: 424-432.
  6. Gil, J.A., N. Montano, and L. Khan. 2000. Effect of four irrigation strategies on the yield and its components in two cultivars of melon (Cucumis Melo L.). RABSU 1: 48-52.
  7. Hartz, T.K. 1997. Effects of drip irrigation scheduling on muskmelons yield and quality. Sci. Hortic. 69: 117-122.
  8. Hernandez, F.B.T., J.A.A. Bedum, M.A. Suzuki, and S. Buzetti. 1995. Effect of irrigation levels on yield of muskmelons in the Ilha Solteira Region, Sao Paulo. Cultura Agron. 4: 1-10.
  9. Howell, T.A., R.H. Cuenca, and K.H. Solomon. 1990. Crop yield response. In: Management of Farm Irrigation Systems (Eds: Hoffman, G.J., T.A. Howell, and K.H. Solomon). ASAE Monog. Michigan, pp. 91-122.
  10. Jensen, M.E., R.D. Burman, and R.G. Allen (Ed.). 1989. Evapotranspiration and Irrigation W