Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2006 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 6

Use of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System Technologies for Developing Greenhouse Databases

Pages
413–420
Publication Date
2006-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study demonstrated that a methodology depending on RS and GIS technologies can be used to create databases that are compatible with EU and other international standards.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This model study was conducted in Antalya region greenhouses for the determination and registration of agricultural resources as a part of adjustment efforts for the European Union (EU) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, greenhouse fields are determined as 2780 ha by this study method while they were reported as 3547.6 ha in the records of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study demonstrated that a methodology depending on RS and GIS technologies can be used to create databases that are compatible with EU and other international standards.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Agricultural database · GIS · remote sensing

Abstract

This model study was conducted in Antalya region greenhouses for the determination and registration of agricultural resources as a part of adjustment efforts for the European Union (EU) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The aim was to create new database systems based on remote sensing (RS) and geographic information systems (GIS), rather than conventional land measurement techniques. For this purpose, glass and plastic greenhouses were determined by visual data analysis of satellite image, and databases were created for each greenhouse by GIS. These databases included area, coordinates and other characteristics of each greenhouse. These databases were prepared in a format that is suitable to provide any kind of information regarding Antalya region greenhouses, including statistical data, in a fast and reliable fashion. In this context, greenhouse fields are determined as 2780 ha by this study method while they were reported as 3547.6 ha in the records of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. This study demonstrated that a methodology depending on RS and GIS technologies can be used to create databases that are compatible with EU and other international standards.

Özet

This model study was conducted in Antalya region greenhouses for the determination and registration of agricultural resources as a part of adjustment efforts for the European Union (EU) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The aim was to create new database systems based on remote sensing (RS) and geographic information systems (GIS), rather than conventional land measurement techniques. For this purpose, glass and plastic greenhouses were determined by visual data analysis of satellite image, and databases were created for each greenhouse by GIS. These databases included area, coordinates and other characteristics of each greenhouse. These databases were prepared in a format that is suitable to provide any kind of information regarding Antalya region greenhouses, including statistical data, in a fast and reliable fashion. In this context, greenhouse fields are determined as 2780 ha by this study method while they were reported as 3547.6 ha in the records of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. This study demonstrated that a methodology depending on RS and GIS technologies can be used to create databases that are compatible with EU and other international standards.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖNMEZ, N. K., SARI, M. (2006). Use of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System Technologies for Developing Greenhouse Databases. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 6, 413–420. https://ajindex.com/articles/179748

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alonso, L. and J. Moreno. 2004. Quasi-automatic geometric correction and related geometric issues in the exploitation of CHRIS/Proba data. Proceedings of the second CHRIS/Proba Workshop, ESA/ESRIN, 28-30
  2. April, Frascati, Italy. Baltsavias, E.P. 1993. Integration of Ortho-images in GIS. Photogrammetric Week ’93. Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 1943,
  3. Wichmann, Stuttgart, pp. 314-324.
  4. Christie, F.R. 2005. Trade and sustainable agricultural practices: Issues, challenges and solutions. Workshop on Post-Doha Trade and Environment Issues. June 16-17,
  5. Manila, Philippines. Chou, T.Y., T.C. Lei, S. Wan and L.S. Yang. 2005. Spatial knowledge databases as applied to the detection of changes in urban land use. Int. J. Rem. Sens. 26: 3047-3068.
  6. Crifasi, G., F. Grassa and M. Scrofani. 2005. Validity of geographic information systems (GIS) applied to protected cultivations. Acta Hort. (ISHS). 614: 41-46.
  7. Dale, P.F. and J.D. McLoughlin. 1988. Land Information Systems. Clarendon Press,
  8. Oxford, United Kingdom. Dwivedi, R.S., K. Sreenivas and K.V. Ramana. 2005. Land-use/land- cover change analysis in part of Ethiopia using Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Int. J. Rem. Sens. 26: 1285-1287.
  9. Keskin, G. and N. Çakaryıldırım. 2003. Greenhouse production. Tarımsal Ekonomi Araştırma Enstitüsü (T.E.A.E.) bulletin. Ankara-TURKEY, 3: 8. Loodts, W.J. 1993. Digital Orthophotos and GIS: The perfect couple. Photogrammetric Week ’93, Wichmann, Stuttgart. Mallawaarachchi, T., P.A. Walker, M.D. Young, R.E. Smyth, H.S. Lynch and G. Dudgeon. 1996. GIS-based integrated modelling systems for natural resource management. Agric. System. 50: 169-189. Microimages, 2006. Advanced software for geospatial analysis TNTmips v6.8. The TNT Products from MicroImages, Lincoln NE, USA. Peuguet, D.J. and D.F. Marble. 1990. Introductory Readings in Geographic Information Systems. Taylor & Francis, London. Relin, A., A. Krause and G. Zeug. 2003. IACS GIS 2005:
  10. Demands and solutions, EFITA 2003
  11. Conference, Debrecen, Vol. 1, Hungary, p.408. Mencet, M.N. and C. Sayın. 2005. Prospective affects of EUREPGAP implementations on Turkish fruit and vegetable markets and export, 1stInternational Food and Nutrition Congress, 15-18
  12. June, İstanbul.
  13. Sayin C., M.N. Mencet and B. Sayin. 2006. Food safety measures and regulations for fresh and vegetable sector in Turkey. V. Congreso Internacional de Ingenieria Agricola (CIACH 2006), VII. Congreso Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Ingenieria Agricola (CLIA), 9-12
  14. May, Chile. Stephen, J.L., T.