SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2015 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 5

Response of bread-wheat seedlings to waterlogging stress

MURAT TİRYAKİOĞLU
SEMA KARANLIK
MEHMET ARSLAN
Pages
807–816
Publication Date
2015-12-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further studies are needed to confirm which tolerance index is significantly correlated with seed yield and which one could be used as a selection criterion under field conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Waterlogging is a widespread problem and one of the major yield-limiting factors of wheat in some parts of the coastal plains of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Twenty-four bread-wheat genotypes were tested under aerobic and anaerobic conditions to determine shoot dry weight gain, root dry weight gain, total dry weight gain, dry leaf weight, specific dry leaf weight, chlorophyll content, carotenoid content, transpiration and photosynthesis rates, and their tolerance indices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further studies are needed to confirm which tolerance index is significantly correlated with seed yield and which one could be used as a selection criterion under field conditions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bread wheat · dry matter · genotype

Abstract

Waterlogging is a widespread problem and one of the major yield-limiting factors of wheat in some parts of the coastal plains of Turkey. The object of this study was to identify waterlogging-tolerant cultivars in bread wheat. Twenty-four bread-wheat genotypes were tested under aerobic and anaerobic conditions to determine shoot dry weight gain, root dry weight gain, total dry weight gain, dry leaf weight, specific dry leaf weight, chlorophyll content, carotenoid content, transpiration and photosynthesis rates, and their tolerance indices. A complete randomized block design with three replications was conducted for both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. The current study clearly demonstrated that wheat seedlings growing under anaerobic conditions had significantly lower shoot dry weight, root dry weight, total dry biomass weight, leaf dry weight, specific leaf dry weight, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a + b, and carotenoid content, and photosynthesis and transpiration rates. There were significant correlations between total dry weight gain and shoot dry weight gain and between chlorophyll a and specific leaf dry weight. Wheat cultivars had different tolerance indices for the investigated plant parameters. Further studies are needed to confirm which tolerance index is significantly correlated with seed yield and which one could be used as a selection criterion under field conditions.

Özet

Waterlogging is a widespread problem and one of the major yield-limiting factors of wheat in some parts of the coastal plains of Turkey. The object of this study was to identify waterlogging-tolerant cultivars in bread wheat. Twenty-four bread-wheat genotypes were tested under aerobic and anaerobic conditions to determine shoot dry weight gain, root dry weight gain, total dry weight gain, dry leaf weight, specific dry leaf weight, chlorophyll content, carotenoid content, transpiration and photosynthesis rates, and their tolerance indices. A complete randomized block design with three replications was conducted for both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. The current study clearly demonstrated that wheat seedlings growing under anaerobic conditions had significantly lower shoot dry weight, root dry weight, total dry biomass weight, leaf dry weight, specific leaf dry weight, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a + b, and carotenoid content, and photosynthesis and transpiration rates. There were significant correlations between total dry weight gain and shoot dry weight gain and between chlorophyll a and specific leaf dry weight. Wheat cultivars had different tolerance indices for the investigated plant parameters. Further studies are needed to confirm which tolerance index is significantly correlated with seed yield and which one could be used as a selection criterion under field conditions.

🔖

Cite This Article

TİRYAKİOĞLU, M., KARANLIK, S., ARSLAN, M. (2015). Response of bread-wheat seedlings to waterlogging stress. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 5, 807–816. https://ajindex.com/articles/179675

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahmed S, Nawata E, Hosokawa M, Domae Y, Sakuratani T (2002). Alterations in photosynthesis and some antioxidant enzymatic activities of mungbean subjected to waterlogging. Plant Sci 63: 117–123.
  2. Ahmed S, Nawata E, Sakuratani T (2006). Changes of endogenous ABA and ACC, and their correlations to photosynthesis and water relations in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczak cv. KPS1) during waterlogging. Environ Exp Bot 57: 278–284.
  3. Arnon DL (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts PPO in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24: 1–15.
  4. Biemelt S, Keetman U, Albrecht G (1998). Re-aeration following hy- poxia or anoxia leads to activation of the antioxidative defense system in roots of wheat seedlings. Plant Physiol 116: 651–658.
  5. Bingru H, Johnson JW, Nesmith S, Bridges DC (1994). Growth, physiological and anatomical responses of two wheat genotypes to waterlogging and nutrient supply. J Exp Bot 45: 193–202.
  6. Bradford KJ (1983). Effects of soil flooding on leaf gas exchange of tomato plants. Plant Physiol 73: 475–479.
  7. Chauhan YS, Silim SN, Kumar Rao JVDK, Johansen C (1997). A pot technique to screen pigeonpea cultivars for resistance to waterlogging. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Sci 178: 179–183.
  8. Chen H, Qualls RG, Blank RR (2005). Effect of soil flooding on photosynthesis, carbohydrate partitioning and nutrient uptake in the invasive exotic Lepidium latifolium. Aquat Bot 82: 250– 268. Chen H, Qualls RG, Miller GC (2002). Adaptive responses of Lepidium latifolium to soil flooding: biomass allocation, adventitious rooting, aerenchyma formation and ethylene production. Environ Exp Bot 48: 119–128.
  9. Collaku A, Harrison SA (2005). Heritability of waterlogging tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci 45: 722–727.
  10. Kozlowski TT (1984). Extent, causes, and impact of flooding. In: Kozlowski TT, editor. Flooding and Plant Growth. London, UK: Academic Press, pp. 9–45.
  11. Leonard WH, Martin IH (1963). Wheat: importance, history and adaptation. In: Leonard WH, Martin JH, editors. Cereal Crops. New York, NY, USA: Macmillan Co., p. 277–287.
  12. Li HB, Vaillancourt R, Mendham NJ, Zhou MX (2008). Comparative mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with waterlogging tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). BMC Genomics 9: 401. Malik AI, Colmer TD, Lambers H, Setter TL, Schortemeyer M (2011). Short-term waterlogging has long-term effects under hypoxia or anoxia. Aust J Crop Sci 5: 1094–1110.
  13. Nandi S, Subudhi PK, Senadhira D, Manigbas NL, Senmandi S, Huang N (1997). Mapping QTL for submergence toleran