SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2015 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 5

Method for substitute modulus determination of furniture frame construction joints

Hasan Özgür İMİRZİ
Jerzy SMARDZEWSKI
Nihat DÖNGEL
Pages
775–785
Publication Date
2015-12-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The accuracy of the developed elasticity modulus model of the examined joints was verified positively both by experimental studies and numerical calculations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The goal of the performed experiments was to determine the strength, stiffness, and modulus of the elasticity of dowel, mortise and loose-tenon, and mortise and tenon L-type furniture joints under diagonal tension and compression loads.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The specimens were constructed from Turkish beech (Fagus orientalis L.), white oak (Quercus alba), and white walnut (Juglans cinerea L.) and were assembled with a water-resistant PVAC adhesive.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The accuracy of the developed elasticity modulus model of the examined joints was verified positively both by experimental studies and numerical calculations.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Elasticity modulus · furniture joints · numerical analysis

Abstract

The goal of the performed experiments was to determine the strength, stiffness, and modulus of the elasticity of dowel, mortise and loose-tenon, and mortise and tenon L-type furniture joints under diagonal tension and compression loads. The specimens were constructed from Turkish beech (Fagus orientalis L.), white oak (Quercus alba), and white walnut (Juglans cinerea L.) and were assembled with a water-resistant PVAC adhesive. According to the obtained results, the highest stiffness/strength values were estimated in mortise and tenon joints constructed of white oak, whereas dowel joints constructed from Turkish beech showed the lowest stiffness/strength and deformability. The elasticity modulus of the experimental joints expressed their stiffness better than the stiffness coefficient. The accuracy of the developed elasticity modulus model of the examined joints was verified positively both by experimental studies and numerical calculations.

Özet

The goal of the performed experiments was to determine the strength, stiffness, and modulus of the elasticity of dowel, mortise and loose-tenon, and mortise and tenon L-type furniture joints under diagonal tension and compression loads. The specimens were constructed from Turkish beech (Fagus orientalis L.), white oak (Quercus alba), and white walnut (Juglans cinerea L.) and were assembled with a water-resistant PVAC adhesive. According to the obtained results, the highest stiffness/strength values were estimated in mortise and tenon joints constructed of white oak, whereas dowel joints constructed from Turkish beech showed the lowest stiffness/strength and deformability. The elasticity modulus of the experimental joints expressed their stiffness better than the stiffness coefficient. The accuracy of the developed elasticity modulus model of the examined joints was verified positively both by experimental studies and numerical calculations.

🔖

Cite This Article

İMİRZİ, H. Ö., SMARDZEWSKI, J., DÖNGEL, N. (2015). Method for substitute modulus determination of furniture frame construction joints. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 5, 775–785. https://ajindex.com/articles/179672

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Altun S, Burdurlu E, Kılıç M (2010). Effect of adhesive types on the bending moment capacity of miter frame corner joints. BioResources 5: 1473–1483.
  2. Aman RL, West HA, Cormier DR (2008). An evaluation of loose tenon joint strength. Forest Prod J 58: 61–64.
  3. Dalvand M, Ebrahimi G, Haftkhani AR, Maleki S (2013). Analysis of factors affecting diagonal tension and compression capacity of corner joints in furniture frames fabricated with dovetail key. J Forest Res 24: 155–168.
  4. Derikvand M, Ebrahimi G, Eckelman CA (2014). Bending moment capacity of mortise and loose-tenon joints. Wood Fiber Sci 46: 1–8.
  5. Derikvand M, Smardzewski J, Ebrahimi G, Dalvand M, Maleki S (2013). Withdrawal force capacity of mortise and loose tenon T-type furniture joints. Turk J Agric For 37: 377–384.
  6. Eckelman CA (1971). Bending strength and moment-rotation characteristics of two-pin moment-resisting dowel joints. Forest Prod J 21: 35–39.
  7. Eckelman CA (1979). Out-of-plane strength and stiffness of dowel joints. Forest Prod J 29: 32–38.
  8. Efe H, Zhang J, Erdil YZ, Kasal A (2005). Moment capacity of traditional and alternative T-type end-to-side-grain furniture joints. Forest Prod J 55: 69–73.
  9. Erdil YZ, Kasal A, Eckelman CA (2005). Bending moment capacity of rectangular mortise and tenon furniture joints. Forest Prod J 55: 209–213. Gawroński T (2005). Multiobjective Optimisation of a Skeleton Furniture Construction. Poznan, Poland: Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu, Rozprawy Naukowe Zeszyt 368. Hrovatin J, Prekrat S, Berginc J, Šernek M, Zupančič A, Oblak L, Medved S (2013). Strength comparison of joints at window frames. Drewno Pr Nauk Donies Komunik 56: 127–135.
  10. Kamperidou V, Barboutis I, Vassiliou V (2011). Correlation between bending and tension strength of corner and middle joints constructed with beech and poplar wood. Ann Warsaw Univ Life Sci 73: 44–50.
  11. Maleki S, Derikvand M, Dalvand M, Ebrahimi G (2012). Load- carrying capacity of mitered furniture corner joints with dovetail keys under diagonal tension load. Turk J Agric For 36: 636–43.
  12. Najafi A (2013). Investigation on the strengths of T-shape joint. Middle East J Sci Res 15: 398–402.
  13. Oktaee J, Ebrahimi, G, Layeghi M, Ghofrani M, Eckelman CA (2014). Bending moment capacity of simple and haunched mortise and tenon furniture joints under tension and compression loads. Turk J Agric For 38: 291–297.
  14. Polish Committee for Standardization (1963). PN-63/D-04117 Fizyczne i mechaniczne własności drewna. Oznaczanie współczynnika sprężystoś