Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2009 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4

Microbial biomass and enzyme activity in vineyard soils under organic and conventional farming systems

Pages
413–423
Publication Date
2009-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results indicate that organic management positively affected biochemical properties, thus improving soil quality and productivity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Many recent studies from around the world have compared organic and conventional farming systems in terms of soil properties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Organic treatments were (i) green manure and farmyard manure at the rate of 30 t ha-1 (GM1), (ii) green manure and farmyard manure at the rate of 10 t ha-1, plus E2001 EM Bio-polymer gel solution (GM2), and (iii) green manure plus E2001 EM Bio-polymer gel solution (GM3).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results indicate that organic management positively affected biochemical properties, thus improving soil quality and productivity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Conventional management · enzyme activity · microbial biomass

Abstract

Many recent studies from around the world have compared organic and conventional farming systems in terms of soil properties. Microbial biomass and enzyme activity were compared in vineyard soils managed by organic and conventional practices under Mediterranean conditions during the growing. Organic treatments were (i) green manure and farmyard manure at the rate of 30 t ha-1 (GM1), (ii) green manure and farmyard manure at the rate of 10 t ha-1, plus E2001 EM Bio-polymer gel solution (GM2), and (iii) green manure plus E2001 EM Bio-polymer gel solution (GM3). Only mineral fertilizers and pesticides were used in the conventional system (CONV). Soil organic C and soil microbial biomass C (SMBC), and protease, urease, alkaline phosphatase, and dehydrogenase activity were significantly higher in the organic system than in the conventional system. The ratio of microbial biomass C to total organic C content (Cmic/Corg) was also higher in the organic plots. Total organic C content increased in the organic system by 13%-23% in comparison to the conventional system. Application of GM1 and GM2 resulted in greater microbial biomass and activity, as compared to the other management systems. SMBC was significantly correlated with dehydrogenase, protease, urease, and alkaline phosphatase. These results indicate that organic management positively affected biochemical properties, thus improving soil quality and productivity.

Özet

Many recent studies from around the world have compared organic and conventional farming systems in terms of soil properties. Microbial biomass and enzyme activity were compared in vineyard soils managed by organic and conventional practices under Mediterranean conditions during the growing. Organic treatments were (i) green manure and farmyard manure at the rate of 30 t ha-1 (GM1), (ii) green manure and farmyard manure at the rate of 10 t ha-1, plus E2001 EM Bio-polymer gel solution (GM2), and (iii) green manure plus E2001 EM Bio-polymer gel solution (GM3). Only mineral fertilizers and pesticides were used in the conventional system (CONV). Soil organic C and soil microbial biomass C (SMBC), and protease, urease, alkaline phosphatase, and dehydrogenase activity were significantly higher in the organic system than in the conventional system. The ratio of microbial biomass C to total organic C content (Cmic/Corg) was also higher in the organic plots. Total organic C content increased in the organic system by 13%-23% in comparison to the conventional system. Application of GM1 and GM2 resulted in greater microbial biomass and activity, as compared to the other management systems. SMBC was significantly correlated with dehydrogenase, protease, urease, and alkaline phosphatase. These results indicate that organic management positively affected biochemical properties, thus improving soil quality and productivity.

🔖

Cite This Article

OKUR, N., ALTINDİŞLİ, A., ÇENGEL, M., GÖÇMEZ, S., KAYIKÇIOĞLU, H. H. (2009). Microbial biomass and enzyme activity in vineyard soils under organic and conventional farming systems. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4, 413–423. https://ajindex.com/articles/179654

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Anderson, J.P.E. and K.H. Domsch. 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10: 215-221.
  2. Anderson, J.P.E. and K.H. Domsch. 1989. Ratios of microbial biomass carbon to total organic carbon in arable soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 21: 471-479.
  3. Anderson, T.H. and K.H. Domsch. 1990. Application of eco- physiological quotients (qCO2 and qD) on microbial biomass from soils of different cropping histories. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22: 251-255. Anonymous, 2003. Official Gazette No: 25207, 25.08.2003.
  4. Balota, E.L., M. Kanashiro, A.C. Filho, D.S. Andrade, and R.P. Dick. 2004. Soil enzyme activities under long-term tillage and crop rotation systems in subtropical agro-ecosystems. Braz. J. Microbiol. 35: 300-306.
  5. Bandick, A.K. and R.P. Dick. 1999. Field management effects on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31: 1471-1479.
  6. Bouyoucos, G.J. 1962. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of the soils. Agron. J. 54: 419-434.
  7. Böhme, L. and F. Böhme. 2006. Soil microbiological and biochemical properties affected by plant growth and different long-term fertilisation. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 42: 1-12.
  8. Bremner, J.M. and C.S. Mulvaney. 1982. Nitrogen-total. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part II. Chemical and Microbiological Properties (eds. A.L. Page, R.H. Millerand D.R. Keeney), American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 595-641.
  9. Carpenter-Boggs, L., A.C. Keeney and J.P. Reganold. 2000. Organic and Biodynamic Management: Effects on Soil Biology. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64: 1651-1659.
  10. Dick, R.P. 1994. Soil enzyme activities as indicators of soil quality. Soil Science Society of America, 677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711, USA. Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. SSSA Special Publication no. 35. Dick, R.P., D.D. Myrold and E.A. Kerle. 1988. Microbial biomass and soil enzyme activities in compacted and rehabilitated skid trail soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52: 512-516.
  11. Eivazi, F. and M.A. Tabatabai. 1977. Phosphatases in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 9: 167-172.
  12. Fliessbach, A., P. Mader, D. Dubois and L. Gunst. 2000. Results from a 21 year old field trial. Organic farming enhances soil fertility and biodiversity. FiBL-Dossier, No. 1:15. Friedel, J. 1993. Einfluß von Bewitschaftungsmaßnahmen auf mikrobielle Eigenschaften im C-und N-Kreislauf von Ackerböden. Ph.D. Thesis. Hohenheimer Bodenkundliche Hefte 11, 178 pp. Garcia, C., T. Hernandez, J.A. Pascual, J.L. Moreno an