Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2015 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 4

Major quantitative trait loci for flowering time in lentil

Pages
588–595
Publication Date
2015-08-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The SSR212_1 marker itself explained 57% of total genotypic variation according to the average of all environments, indicating the potential use of these markers in marker-assisted selection studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for flowering time (FT) in lentil were located using a recombinant inbreed line population derived from an intraspecific cross of Precoz × WA8649041.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Experiments for FT were conducted in 2 locations (Haymana, Turkey and Pullman, WA, USA) for 5 years (from 1998 to 2002 in both Pullman and Haymana).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The SSR212_1 marker itself explained 57% of total genotypic variation according to the average of all environments, indicating the potential use of these markers in marker-assisted selection studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Early flowering time · genetic markers · Lens culinaris

Abstract

Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for flowering time (FT) in lentil were located using a recombinant inbreed line population derived from an intraspecific cross of Precoz × WA8649041. Experiments for FT were conducted in 2 locations (Haymana, Turkey and Pullman, WA, USA) for 5 years (from 1998 to 2002 in both Pullman and Haymana). A linkage map was constructed using 149 markers (RAPD, AFLP, ISSR, SSR, and 2 morphological markers) located on 11 linkage groups (LGs). Analysis of variance of FT was found to be significant for all locations and years. One major QTL for FT was identified on LG6 across all environments, indicating the stability of the QTL. The LOD scores for FT varied between 3.25 and 13.64 among the environments. The markers UBC318_2, SSR212_1, UBC220, M09a, and M09 on the QTL region were statistically significant in all environments. The SSR212_1 marker itself explained 57% of total genotypic variation according to the average of all environments, indicating the potential use of these markers in marker-assisted selection studies.

Özet

Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for flowering time (FT) in lentil were located using a recombinant inbreed line population derived from an intraspecific cross of Precoz × WA8649041. Experiments for FT were conducted in 2 locations (Haymana, Turkey and Pullman, WA, USA) for 5 years (from 1998 to 2002 in both Pullman and Haymana). A linkage map was constructed using 149 markers (RAPD, AFLP, ISSR, SSR, and 2 morphological markers) located on 11 linkage groups (LGs). Analysis of variance of FT was found to be significant for all locations and years. One major QTL for FT was identified on LG6 across all environments, indicating the stability of the QTL. The LOD scores for FT varied between 3.25 and 13.64 among the environments. The markers UBC318_2, SSR212_1, UBC220, M09a, and M09 on the QTL region were statistically significant in all environments. The SSR212_1 marker itself explained 57% of total genotypic variation according to the average of all environments, indicating the potential use of these markers in marker-assisted selection studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAHRİMAN, A., TEMEL, H. Y., AYDOĞAN, A., TANYOLAÇ, M. B. (2015). Major quantitative trait loci for flowering time in lentil. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 4, 588–595. https://ajindex.com/articles/179628

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Anbessa Y, Warkentin T, Vandenberg A, Bandara M (2006). Heritability and predicted gain from selection in components of crop duration in divergent chickpea cross populations. Euphytica 152: 1–8.
  2. Arumuganathan K, Earle ED (1991). Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 9: 208–218.
  3. Chiang GCK, Barua D, Kramer EM, Amasino RM, Donohue K (2009).
  4. Major flowering time gene, FLOWERING LOCUS C, regulates seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 11661–11666.
  5. Erskine W, Ellis RH, Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH, Hussain A (1990). Characterization of responses to temperature and photoperiod for time to flowering in a world lentil collection. Theor Appl Genet 80: 193–199.
  6. Erskine W, Hussain A, Tahir M, Bahksh A, Ellis RH, Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH (1994). Field evaluation of a model of photothermal flowering responses in a world lentil collection. Theor Appl Genet 88: 423–428.
  7. Fratini R, Durán Y, García P, Pérez de la Vega M (2007). Identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for plant structure, growth habit and yield in lentil. Span J Agric Res 5: 348–356.
  8. Hamdi A, Erskine W, Gates P (1991). Relationships among economic characters in lentil. Euphytica 57: 109–116.
  9. Jonathan HC, Mithen R, Brown JKM, Dean C (1995). QTL analysis of flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet 248: 278–286.
  10. Kahraman A, Kusmenoglu I, Aydin N, Aydogan A, Erksine W, Muehlbauer FJ (2004). QTL mapping of winter hardiness genes in lentil. Crop Sci 44: 13–22.
  11. Kearsey MJ, Pooni HS (1996). The Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits. London, UK: Chapman & Hall. Kumar J, Van Rheenen HA (2000). A major gene for time of flowering in chickpea. J Hered 91: 67–68.
  12. Levy YY, Dean C (1998). The transition to flowering. Plant Cell 10: 1973–1989.
  13. Manly KF, Cudmore RH, Meer JM (2001). Map Manager QTX, cross platform software for genetic mapping. Mamm Genome 12: 930–932.
  14. Mei DS, Wang HZ, Hu Q, Li YD, Xu YS, Li YC (2009). QTL analysis on plant height and flowering time in Brassica napus. Plant Breeding 128: 458–465.
  15. Nelson JC (1997). QGENE: Software for marker-based genomic analysis and breeding. Mol Breed 3: 239–245.
  16. Pilet-Nayel ML, Muehlbauer FJ, McGee RJ, Kraft JM, Baranger A, Coyne CJ (2002). Quantitative trait loci for partial resistance to Aphanomyces root rot in pea. Theor Appl Genet 106: 28–39.
  17. Sarker A, Erksin W, Sharma B, Tyagi MC (1999). Inheritance and linkage relationship of days to flower and morphological loci in lentil (Lens cu