Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

Gene expression profiles of Hsp family members in different poplar taxa under cadmium stress

Pages
102–110
Publication Date
2021-02-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the genes responsive against Cd stress can be used for gene cloning and functional analyses, which could open new perspectives for improving Cd-tolerant plants or trees.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Heat shock proteins (Hsps), also known as stress proteins, are expressed by living organisms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Under cadmium stress conditions, the expression profiles of genes including PtsHsp-44, PtsHsp-54, PtHsp40-117, PtHsp60-06, PtHsp60-12, PtHsp70-21, PtHsp70-28, PtHsp90-02, PtHsp90-10, PtHsp90-12, PtHsp100-22, and PtHsp100-71 were observed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the genes responsive against Cd stress can be used for gene cloning and functional analyses, which could open new perspectives for improving Cd-tolerant plants or trees.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cadmium stress · gene expression analysis · heat shock proteins

Abstract

Heat shock proteins (Hsps), also known as stress proteins, are expressed by living organisms. Hsp genes play key roles in the regulation of change in response to various abiotic stresses (e.g., salinity, drought, heavy metal, and extreme temperatures). In our previous studies, all Hsp family gene members were determined and named using bioinformatics approaches. We also examined their expression profiles under different stress conditions. In this study, the aim was to indicate the expression pattern of Hsp family genes under cadmium (Cd) stress in different poplar taxa which are resistant to various stresses. Firstly, transcriptome data including RNA-seq and microarray were evaluated to select Hsp gene members that were suitable targets for the cadmium stress response. Then, the expression analysis of selected genes was studied with qRT-PCR (real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR) in different poplar taxa. Under cadmium stress conditions, the expression profiles of genes including PtsHsp-44, PtsHsp-54, PtHsp40-117, PtHsp60-06, PtHsp60-12, PtHsp70-21, PtHsp70-28, PtHsp90-02, PtHsp90-10, PtHsp90-12, PtHsp100-22, and PtHsp100-71 were observed. In the future, N.03.368A and I-214 taxa may be used for plantation in Cd-contaminated areas and studied under subsequent long-term observation. This study yielded preliminary information about Cd-stress-related molecular mechanisms that will be utilized for future projects. In addition, the genes responsive against Cd stress can be used for gene cloning and functional analyses, which could open new perspectives for improving Cd-tolerant plants or trees.

🔖

Cite This Article

CELİK, E. N. Y., BALOGLU, M. C., AYAN, S. (2021). Gene expression profiles of Hsp family members in different poplar taxa under cadmium stress. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 102–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/179573

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Altunoglu YC, 2017, PHYSIOL MOL BIOL PLA, V23, P5, DOI 10.1007/s12298-016-0405-8 Altunoglu YC, 2016, PLANT GROWTH REGUL, V80, P225, DOI 10.1007/s10725-016-0160-4 Ariani A, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0117571 Ashraf M, 2007, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V59, P206, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006 Baloglu MC, 2015, BIOTECHNOL BIOTEC EQ, V29, P1024, DOI 10.1080/13102818.2015.1079144 Baloglu Mehmet Cengiz, 2014, Plant Omics, V7, P260 Baloglu MC, 2014,
  2. GENE, V550, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.gene.2014.08.025 Baloglu MC, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0096014 Baloglu MC, 2014, BIOCHEM GENET, V52, P90, DOI 10.1007/s10528-013-9630-9 Benavides María P., 2005, Braz. J. Plant Physiol., V17, P21, DOI 10.1590/S1677-04202005000100003 Chinnusamy V, 2004, J EXP BOT, V55, P225, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erh005 Chun Y, 2020,
  3. RICE, V13, DOI 10.1186/s12284-020-0368-9 Demirevska K, 2008, PLANT GROWTH REGUL, V56, P97, DOI 10.1007/s10725-008-9288-1 Di Baccio D, 2014, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V171, P1693, DOI 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.08.007 Emamverdian Abolghassem, 2015, ScientificWorldJournal, V2015, P756120, DOI 10.1155/2015/756120 Ghatak A, 2016, J PROTEOMICS, V143, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.02.032 Gupta SC, 2010, LIFE SCI, V86, P377, DOI 10.1016/j.lfs.2009.12.015 Hall JL, 2002, J EXP BOT, V53, P1, DOI 10.1093/jexbot/53.366.1 Hasegawa Y, 2006, PLANT METHODS, V2, DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-2-5 He JL, 2013, PLANT PHYSIOL, V162, P424, DOI 10.1104/pp.113.215681 HENDRICK JP, 1993, ANNU REV BIOCHEM, V62, P349, DOI 10.1146/annurev.bi.62.070193.002025 Jeong HJ, 2015, J INTEGR PLANT BIOL, V57, P913, DOI 10.1111/jipb.12362 Kim E, 2012, G3-GENES GENOM GENET, V2, P913, DOI 10.1534/g3.112.003368 Kosova K, 2011, J PROTEOMICS, V74, P1301, DOI 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.02.006 Kramer U, 2010, ANNU REV PLANT BIOL, V61, P517, DOI 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112156 Landi S, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01214 Lim CJ, 2006, J PLANT RES, V119, P373, DOI 10.1007/s10265-006-0285-z Liu JP, 1998,
  4. SCIENCE, V280, P1943, DOI 10.1126/science.280.5371.1943 Liu ZS, 2015, BMC PLANT BIOL, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12870-015-0511-8 Livak KJ, 2001,
  5. METHODS, V25, P402, DOI 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 Marmiroli M, 2013,
  6. CHEMOSPHERE, V93, P1333, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.07.065 Najafi M, 2013, THESIS. RITOSSA F, 1962,
  7. EXPERIENTIA, V18, P571, DOI 10.1007/BF02172188 Rua Q, 2012, IDENTIFICATION REGUL. Sanita di Toppi L, 1999, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V41, P105, DOI 10.1016/S0098-8472(98)00058-6 SCHLESINGER MJ, 1990, J BIO