Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1

Seed fatty acid compositions and chemotaxonomy of wild safflower (Carthamus L., Asteraceae) species in Turkey

Pages
45–54
Publication Date
2018-02-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The dendrogram based on the fatty acid ratios discriminated section Carthamus and section Atractylis of the genus Carthamus; however, the resulting tree was not compatible with the previously constructed phylogeny trees in detail

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz Safflower is an important oilseed crop for the dry regions of the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, 71 populations from 5 naturally growing Carthamus species were collected from Turkey: Carthamus dentatus (30 accessions), Carthamus lanatus (30 accessions), Carthamus persicus (2 accessions), Carthamus glaucus (6 accessions), and Carthamus tenuis (3 accessions).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The dendrogram based on the fatty acid ratios discriminated section Carthamus and section Atractylis of the genus Carthamus; however, the resulting tree was not compatible with the previously constructed phylogeny trees in detail
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Carthamus · chemotaxonomy · fatty acid composition

Özet

Öz Safflower is an important oilseed crop for the dry regions of the world. In the present study, we aimed to find out the seed oil content and composition of the wild relatives of safflower. For this purpose, 71 populations from 5 naturally growing Carthamus species were collected from Turkey: Carthamus dentatus (30 accessions), Carthamus lanatus (30 accessions), Carthamus persicus (2 accessions), Carthamus glaucus (6 accessions), and Carthamus tenuis (3 accessions). Our research covered all naturally growing safflower species in the flora of Turkey. The seeds belonging to 71 accessions were germinated in cabinets and transferred to vials in order to obtain seedlings and then sown in the field manually. After harvesting, the seed oil content (%) and fatty acid compositions were determined. The seed oil content ranged between 10.50% and 20.40% in all accessions. Thirteen fatty acids, mainly linoleic (58.8% to 82.6%), oleic (7.3% to 22.8%), and palmitic acids (4.8% to 8.8%) were determined. The fatty acid compositions were more or less similar in all investigated species; however, the seed oil contents were different. For the evaluation of fatty acid properties as a taxonomic character, cluster analysis was performed. The dendrogram based on the fatty acid ratios discriminated section Carthamus and section Atractylis of the genus Carthamus; however, the resulting tree was not compatible with the previously constructed phylogeny trees in detail

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, Y., HACIOĞLU, B. T. (2018). Seed fatty acid compositions and chemotaxonomy of wild safflower (Carthamus L., Asteraceae) species in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1, 45–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/179510

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. References Agrawal R, Tsujimoto H, Tandon R, Rao SR, Raina SN (2013). Species-genomic relationships among the tribasic diploid and polyploid Carthamus taxa based on physical mapping of active and inactive 18S–5.8 S–26S and 5S ribosomal RNA gene families, and the two tandemly repeated DNA sequences. Gene 521: 136-144.
  2. Ahmadzadeh S, Kadivar M, Saeidi G (2014). Investigation of oil properties and seed composition in some safflower lines and cultivars. J Food Biochem 38: 527-532.
  3. Alvarenga SAV, Ferreira MJP, Emerenciano VP, Cabrol-Bass D (2001). Chemosystematic studies of natural compounds isolated from Asteraceae: characterization of tribes by principal component analysis. Chemometr Intell Lab 56: 27-37.
  4. Ashri A, Efron Y (1964). Inheritance studies with fertile interspecific hybrids of three Carthamus L. species. Crop Sci 4: 510-514.
  5. Ashri A, Knowles PF (1960). Cytogenetics of safflower ( Carthamus L.) species and their hybrids. Agron J 52: 11-17.
  6. Ashri A, Rudich J (1965). Unequal reciprocal natural hybridization rates between two Carthamus L. species. Crop Sci 5: 190-191.
  7. Bagci E, Bruehl L, Aitzetmuller K, Altan Y (2003). A chemotaxonomic approach to the fatty acid and tocochromanol content of Cannabis sativa L. (Cannabaceae). Turk J Bot 27: 141-147.
  8. Bagmohammadi H, Pahlevani M, Ahmadikhah A, Razavi SE (2012). Genetic variation of safflower ( Carthamus tinctorius L.) and related species revealed by ISSR analysis. Plant Breeding and Seed Science 66: 139-150.
  9. Baloch FS, Kurt C, Arıoğlu H, Özkan H (2010). Assaying of diversity among soybean ( Glycin max (L.) Merr.) and peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes at DNA level. Turk J Agric For 34: 285- 301. Boch R (1961). Honey bee activity on safflower ( Carthamus tinctorius L.). Can J Plant Sci 41: 559-562.
  10. Bowles VG, Mayerhofer R, Davis C, Good AG, H all JC (2010). A phylogenetic investigation of Carthamus combining sequence and microsatellite data. Plant Syst Evol 287: 85-97.
  11. Butler GD Jr, Werner EG, Leven MD (1966). Native bees associated with safflower in Southern Central Arizona. J Kansas Entomol Soc 39: 434-436.
  12. Carapetian J, Zarei G (2005). Variation in protein, oil and fatty acid contents in three wild species of safflower ( Carthamus L.) from West Azerbaijan, Iran. International Journal of Botany 1: 133- 137. Claassen CE (1950). Natural and controlled crossing in safflower ( Carthamus tinctorius L.). Argon J 42: 381-384.
  13. Corleto A, Alba E, Polignano GB, Vonghio G (1997). Safflower: a multipurpose species