Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of some melon lines for their resistance against melon aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover

Pages
322–329
Publication Date
2020-04-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the results suggest that first PI-414723 and then ŞÜKRÜBEY, TK15, and ÜNLÜ may be used for the management of A. gossypii.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The melon aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover Hemiptera: Aphididae , which has a very wide host range including cucurbit species, causes serious direct and indirect damage to many crops.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In both greenhouse and open field melon cultivation in Antalya in southwestern Turkey , the control of this pest generally depends on the use of chemical insecticides, resulting in a rapid increase in resistance to a wide range of insecticides.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, the results suggest that first PI-414723 and then ŞÜKRÜBEY, TK15, and ÜNLÜ may be used for the management of A. gossypii.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Antalya · Aphis gossypii · melon aphid

Abstract

The melon aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover Hemiptera: Aphididae , which has a very wide host range including cucurbit species, causes serious direct and indirect damage to many crops. In both greenhouse and open field melon cultivation in Antalya in southwestern Turkey , the control of this pest generally depends on the use of chemical insecticides, resulting in a rapid increase in resistance to a wide range of insecticides. In the present study, a total of 23 melon lines 22 indigenous and 1 exotic belonging to 2 varieties Cucumis melo var. inodorus and C. melo var. reticulatus were evaluated for resistance to the pest. The study consisted of 2 consecutive work packages; in the first stage, 23 melon lines were evaluated for resistance to A. gossypii by using the antixenosis test method under growth chamber conditions at 26/20 °C day/night temperatures, respectively , with a photoperiod of 16:8 h light:dark ; in the second stage, the most resistant 4 lines PI-414723, ÜNLÜ, TK15, and ŞÜKRÜBEY were evaluated once more for resistance against the pest by using the choice-test method in climate chambers at 26 °C and continuous light. N3, which was found to be the most susceptible line in the first stage of the study, served as the control. Counts were made 30 min, 1, 2, 4, and 8 h after the aphids were introduced into the test arena a 15-cm diameter Petri dish including leaf discs 2.5 cm diameter belonging to the 5 lines. The results of the choice test showed that the aphids preferred the PI-414723 line 2 aphids/disc after 8 h less than the 3 other resistant lines. Additionally, aphids preferred to settle on the susceptible control N3 6 aphids/disc after 8 h during the experiment. Overall, the results suggest that first PI-414723 and then ŞÜKRÜBEY, TK15, and ÜNLÜ may be used for the management of A. gossypii.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRIŞIK, M., ÜNLÜ, M., ERLER, F. (2020). Evaluation of some melon lines for their resistance against melon aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 322–329. https://ajindex.com/articles/179470

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Blackman RL, Eastop VF (2000). Aphids on the World’s Crops: An Identification and Information Guide, 2nd ed. London: John Wiley & Sons. Bohn GW, Kishaba AN, Principe JA, Toba HH (1973). Tolerance to melon aphid in Cucumis melo L. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 98: 37-40.
  2. Bohn GW, Kishaba AN, Toba HH (1972). Mechanisms of resistance to melon aphid in a muskmelon line. Horticultural Science 7: 925-935.
  3. Capinera JL (2001). Handbook of Vegetable Pests. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.
  4. Chen JQ, Delobel B, Rahb Y, Sauvion N (1996). Biological and chemical characteristics of a genetic resistance of melon to the melon aphid. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 80: 250-253.
  5. Devonshire AL (1989). Resistance of aphids to insecticides. World Crop Pests: Aphids, C: 123-139.
  6. Doryanizadeh N, Moharramipour S, Hosseininaveh V, Mehrabadi M (2017). Antixenotic resistance of eight Cucumis genotypes to melon aphid Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and some associated plant traits. Journal of Crop Protection 6: 207-214.
  7. Garzo E, Soria C, Gomez-Guillamon ML, Fereres A (2002). Feeding behavior of Aphis gossypii on resistant accessions of different melon genotypes (Cucumis melo). Phytoparasitica 30: 129-140.
  8. Gonzales WL, Negritto MA, Suarez LH, Gianoli E (2008). Induction of glandular and non-glandular trichomes by damage in leaves of Madia sativa under contrasting water regimes. Acta Oecologica 33: 128-132.
  9. Jackson ML (2005). Soil Chemical Analysis: Advanced Course. Madison, WI, USA: UW-Madison Libraries Parallel Press.
  10. Kamel AM, El-Gengaihi SE (2009). Is there a relationship between the level of plant metabolites in cucumber and globe cucumber and the degree of insect infestation? Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 37: 144. Kishaba AN, Bohn GW, Toba HH (1971). Resistance to Aphis gossypii in muskmelon. Journal of Economic Entomology 64: 935-937.
  11. Kishaba AN, Bohn GW, Toba HH (1976). Genetic aspects of antibiosis to Aphis gossypii in Cucumis melo from India. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 101: 557-561.
  12. Klingler J, Kovalski I, Silberstein L, Thompson GA, Perl-Treves R (2001). Mapping of cotton-melon aphid resistance in melon. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 126: 56-63.
  13. Le Roux V, Dugravot S, Campan E, Dubois F, Vincent C et al. (2008). Wild Solanum resistance to aphids: Antixenosis or antibiosis? Journal of Economic Entomology 101: 584-591.
  14. Levin DA (1973). The role of trichomes