Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5

Dihydroquercetin increases the adaptive potential of wild soybean against copper sulfate and cadmium sulfate toxicity

Pages
492–499
Publication Date
2020-10-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, we suggest that flavonoids may take part in the adaptation of plants to the effects of copper and cadmium.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the mechanism of the biochemical adaptation of wild soybean to the experimentally modeled effects of cadmium sulfate and copper sulfate in approximately double permissible concentration was investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The extracted concentrations of cadmium and copper in the experimental soil were determined by inversion voltammetry – 1.46 and 48.25 mg/kg, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, we suggest that flavonoids may take part in the adaptation of plants to the effects of copper and cadmium.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Glycine soja Sieb. & Zucc. · acid phosphatase · biochemical adaptation

Abstract

In this study, the mechanism of the biochemical adaptation of wild soybean to the experimentally modeled effects of cadmium sulfate and copper sulfate in approximately double permissible concentration was investigated. The extracted concentrations of cadmium and copper in the experimental soil were determined by inversion voltammetry – 1.46 and 48.25 mg/kg, respectively. Growing soybeans in soil with the addition of copper and cadmium sulfates led to an increase in the concentration of malonic dialdehyde in soybean seeds relative to control by 62% and 38%, respectively, which confirmed the strengthening of oxidative processes. There was also an increase in the specific activity of peroxidase by 198% under the action of copper sulfate and 122% under the action of cadmium sulfate. Copper in the studied concentration was more toxic than cadmium. Acid phosphatase showed stable specific activity under the action of the studied metals. PAGE revealed multiple forms that were absent from the control: under the action of copper sulfate–AP7, AP12; cadmium sulfate–AP12. Dihydroquercetin treatment of soybean seeds before sowing in soil contaminated with copper and cadmium sulfates led to a decrease in the level of malonic dialdehyde by 20% and 11%, respectively, and a decrease in the specific activity of peroxidase by an average of 12%. There was a decrease in specific activity and the appearance of new multiple forms of acid phosphatase: under the action of copper sulfate by 18%, AP13; cadmium sulfate – 25%, AP2 and AP13. Thus, we suggest that flavonoids may take part in the adaptation of plants to the effects of copper and cadmium.

🔖

Cite This Article

CHERNYSHUK, D. K. (2020). Dihydroquercetin increases the adaptive potential of wild soybean against copper sulfate and cadmium sulfate toxicity. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5, 492–499. https://ajindex.com/articles/179402

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Adrees M, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V22, P8148, DOI 10.1007/s11356-015-4496-5 [Anonymous], 1985, STATE STANDARD 26483. [Anonymous], 2006, METHODICAL INSTRUCTI. Celekli A, 2013, B ENVIRON CONTAM TOX, V91, P571, DOI 10.1007/s00128-013-1100-x Chernyshuk D.K., 2018, PROBLEMS REGION ECOL, V2, P27 Churnakov A, 2016, AIP CONF PROC, V1772, DOI 10.1063/1.4964563 Considine MJ, 2017, J EXP BOT, V68, P1815, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erx099 DAVIS BJ, 1964, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V121, P404, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb14213.x Dey S., 2014, INT J RES APPL NATUR, V2, P223 Ferreira CV, 1998, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V36, P487, DOI 10.1016/S0981-9428(98)80173-3 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (Fao), 2017, FUTURE FOOD AGR TREN Gogotov AF, 2014, RUSS J APPL CHEM+, V87, P1877, DOI 10.1134/S1070427214120143 GORNALL AG, 1949, J BIOL CHEM, V177, P751 Grosser G, 2015, ARCH TOXICOL, V89, P2253, DOI 10.1007/s00204-014-1379-3 Ivachenko LE, 2016, PHARM CHEM, V8, P236 Ivachenko LE, 2008, METHODS STUDY SOYBEA Kolesnichenko V. V., 2012, Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry, V8, P5 Kong YB, 2018, FRONT PLANT SCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00292 Koroteev AM, 2014, BUTLER SOOBSHCH, V39, P94 Kulikova AL, 2011, RUSS J PLANT PHYSL+, V58, P836, DOI 10.1134/S102144371105013X Kuznetsova VA, 2015, UCHENYE ZAP KAZAN UN, V157, P69 Li MW, 2020, THEOR APPL GENET, V133, P1655, DOI 10.1007/s00122-019-03462-6 Li MW, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00854 Li WYF, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V178, P80, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02356.x Liu ZL, 2015, J PLANT GROWTH REGUL, V34, P672, DOI 10.1007/s00344-015-9483-z Liu ZP, 2015, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V876, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.aca.2015.03.027 Martinez V, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00838 Merve A., 2012, J STRESS PHYSL BIOCH, V8, P180 Miransari M, 2016, ABIOTIC BIOTIC STRES, P197 Nawaz MA, 2018,
  2. REDISCOVERY LANDRACE, DOI [10.5772/intechopen.74973, DOI 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.74973] Printz B, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00601 Saeed A, 2014, J ANIM PLANT SCI, V24, P1466 Semenova E A, 2012, MODERN SCI INTENSIVE, V7, P33 Shapoval OA, 2015,
  3. FERTILITY, V5, P32, DOI [10.3390/nano9091248, DOI 10.3390/NANO9091248] Skadhauge B, 1997,
  4. HEREDITAS, V126, P147, DOI 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1997.00147.x Srivastava PK, 2014, INT J BIOL MACROMOL, V64, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.11.023 Tabaldi LA, 2007, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V59, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.10.009 Tsukamoto C, 2018, TURK J AGRIC FOR, V42, P248, DOI 10.39