Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5

DNA fingerprinting and genetic diversity analysis of world quinoa germplasm using iPBS-retrotransposon marker system

Pages
479–491
Publication Date
2020-10-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings of this study can be used for deeper understanding of the genetic relationship and in the determination of appropriate breeding and conservation strategies for quinoa.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Quinoa is an important staple food crop for millions of impoverished rural inhabitants of the Andean region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to investigate the genetic diversity and population structure of world quinoa germplasm originating from 8 countries through the iPBS-retrotransposon marker system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings of this study can be used for deeper understanding of the genetic relationship and in the determination of appropriate breeding and conservation strategies for quinoa.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Chenopodium quinoa · grain crop · polymorphism

Abstract

Quinoa is an important staple food crop for millions of impoverished rural inhabitants of the Andean region. Quinoa is considered a good source of protein,vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants. This study aimed to investigate the genetic diversity and population structure of world quinoa germplasm originating from 8 countries through the iPBS-retrotransposon marker system. Molecular characterization was performed using the 11 most polymorphic primers. A total of 235 bands were recorded, of which 66.8% were polymorphic. Mean polymorphism information content (PIC) was 0.410. Various diversity indices including mean effective number of alleles (1.269), mean Shannon’s information index (0.160) and gene diversity (0.247) revealed the existence of sufficient amount of genetic diversity in studied germplasm. Bolivia–17 and Mexico–1 were found to be genetically distinct accessions and can be suggested as candidate parents for future breeding activities. Various diversity indices were also calculated among germplasm collection counries and the results clearly showed the existence of higher genetic diversity in Bolivian and Peruvian accessions. The model-based structure, neighbor-joining, and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) grouped quinoa germplasm according to their collection country. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed that most of the variations (69%) in world quinoa germplasm are due to differences within populations. Findings of this study can be used for deeper understanding of the genetic relationship and in the determination of appropriate breeding and conservation strategies for quinoa.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARUT, M., NADEEM, M. A., KARAKOY, T., BALOCH, F. S. (2020). DNA fingerprinting and genetic diversity analysis of world quinoa germplasm using iPBS-retrotransposon marker system. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5, 479–491. https://ajindex.com/articles/179401

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. James LEA, 2009, ADV FOOD NUTR RES, V58, P1, DOI 10.1016/S1043-4526(09)58001-1 Al-Naggar A. M. M., 2017, BRIT BIOTECHNOLOGY J, V20, P1 Andeden EE, 2013, J PLANT BIOCHEM BIOT, V22, P453, DOI 10.1007/s13562-012-0175-5 Ando H, 2002, FOOD SCI TECHNOL RES, V8, P80, DOI 10.3136/fstr.8.80 Aydin MF, 2019, LEGUME RES, V42, P18, DOI 10.18805/LR-423 Baloch FS, 2015, BIOCHEM SYST ECOL, V61, P244, DOI 10.1016/j.bse.2015.06.017 Bazile D, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00622 Bhargava A, 2006, IND CROP PROD, V23, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.indcrop.2005.04.002 Bouchet S, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033470 Christensen S. A., 2007, Plant Genetic Resources Characterization and Utilization, V5, P82, DOI 10.1017/S1479262107672293 Doyle J. J., 1990,
  2. FOCUS, V12, P13. Evanno G, 2005, MOL ECOL, V14, P2611, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x FINNEGAN DJ, 1989, TRENDS GENET, V5, P103, DOI 10.1016/0168-9525(89)90039-5 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2013, HOME INT YEAR QUINOA Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2017, FAOSTAT Fuentes FF, 2009, CONSERV GENET, V10, P369, DOI 10.1007/s10592-008-9604-3 Galwey N., 1989, FOOD SCI NUTR, V42, P245, DOI [10.1080/09543465.1989.11904148, DOI 10.1080/09543465.1989.11904148] Gramazio P, 2018, TURK J AGRIC FOR, V42, P165, DOI 10.3906/tar-1801-41 Guliyev N, 2018, TURK J AGRIC FOR, V42, P393, DOI 10.3906/tar-1707-18 Habyarimana E., 2016, Australian Journal of Crop Science, V10, P127 HEISER CB, 1974,
  3. GENETICS, V78, P503. Hirose Y, 2010, FOOD CHEM, V119, P1300, DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.09.008 Hossein-Pour A, 2019, APPL ECOL ENV RES, V17, P1899, DOI 10.15666/aeer/1702_18991911 Jacobsen SE, 2003, FOOD REV INT, V19, P99, DOI 10.1081/FRI-120018872 Jarvis DE, 2017,
  4. NATURE, V542, P307, DOI 10.1038/nature21370 Kalendar R, 2010, THEOR APPL GENET, V121, P1419, DOI 10.1007/s00122-010-1398-2 Karik U, 2019, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/agronomy9100647 KIMURA M, 1965, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V54, P731, DOI 10.1073/pnas.54.3.731 Maughan PJ, 2012, PLANT GENOME-US, V5, P114, DOI 10.3835/plantgenome2012.06.0011 Mir RR, 2012, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V59, P717, DOI 10.1007/s10722-011-9713-6 Morillo A, 2017, AFR J BIOTECHNOL, V16, P483 Nemli S, 2015, TURK J AGRIC FOR, V39, P940, DOI 10.3906/tar-1505-59 Newell MA, 2013, ANN APPL STAT, V7, P1898, DOI 10.1214/13-AOAS671 Peakall R, 2012,
  5. BIOINFORMATICS, V28, P2537, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460 Repo-Carrasco R, 2003, FOOD REV INT, V19, P179, DOI