Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

Earliness, yield, and fruit quality characteristics in low chill peach-nectarines: a comparison of protected and open area cultivation

Pages
191–202
Publication Date
2021-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of this study revealed that low chill peach-nectarine cultivars grown in protected cultivation showed variable earliness, yield, and fruit quality depending on chilling duration and heat accumulation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine the effects of protected cultivation on the earliness, yield, and fruit quality characteristics of some lowchill peach-nectarine cultivars grown in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Phenological observations, yield parameters, and fruit quality characteristics were investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of this study revealed that low chill peach-nectarine cultivars grown in protected cultivation showed variable earliness, yield, and fruit quality depending on chilling duration and heat accumulation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Early harvest · peach-nectarine · performance

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the effects of protected cultivation on the earliness, yield, and fruit quality characteristics of some lowchill peach-nectarine cultivars grown in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Phenological observations, yield parameters, and fruit quality characteristics were investigated. The chilling durations as CH (chilling hours), CU (chilling unit), and heat accumulations were determined. The ‘Astoria’ cultivar reached the highest cumulative yield of 29.11 kg/tree and 38.72 t/ha, and fruit size was 131.89 g and 61.74 mm in protected cultivation. The CH and CU values under protected cultivation were 28% and 40% lower than in open area cultivation, respectively. The heat accumulation was 30% higher for GDH30 in the protected cultivation. The results of this study revealed that low chill peach-nectarine cultivars grown in protected cultivation showed variable earliness, yield, and fruit quality depending on chilling duration and heat accumulation.

🔖

Cite This Article

CALİSKAN, O., BAYAZİT, S., GUNDUZ, K., KİLİC, D., GOKTAS, S. (2021). Earliness, yield, and fruit quality characteristics in low chill peach-nectarines: a comparison of protected and open area cultivation. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 191–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/179394

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Bayazit S, 2012, MUSTAFA KEMAL U ZIRA, V17, P23 Bellini E, 2000, ACTA HORTIC, P435. Bellini E, 2000, ACTA HORTIC, P427. Ben Mimoun M, 1999, ACTA HORTIC, P107, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.499.10 Caliskan O, 2012, NOT BOT HORTI AGROBO, V40, P284 Campoy JA, 2011, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V130, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.07.011 Caruso T, 2015,
  2. HORTSCIENCE, V50, P1160, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.50.8.1160 Colantuono F., 2012, Advances in Horticultural Science, V26, P32 Crisosto C. H., 2008, The peach: botany, production and uses, P536, DOI 10.1079/9781845933869.0536 Dolek C, 2014, SELCUK TARIM BILIMLE, V1, P74 DOZIER WA, 1990,
  3. HORTSCIENCE, V25, P1573, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.25.12.1573 Erez A, 1998, ACTA HORTIC, P593, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.465.74 Erez A, 2000, TEMPERATE FRUIT CROPS IN WARM CLIMATES, P17 FALQUI D, 1994, ACTA HORTIC, P565, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.1994.361.62 Fideghelli C, 1998, ACTA HORTIC, P29, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.465.1 Ghrab M, 2016, INT J FRUIT SCI, V16, P323, DOI 10.1080/15538362.2015.1137532 Giovannelli C., 2014, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, V8, P427 Handley DF, 2000,
  4. HORTSCIENCE, V35, P771, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.35.4.771 Hoying SA, 2007, NEW YORK FRUIT Q, V15, P13 Imrak B., 2009,
  5. TABAD, Tarim Bilimleri Arastirma Dergisi, V2, P187 Imrak B, 2016, FRESEN ENVIRON BULL, V25, P4345 Ionescu IA, 2017, J EXP BOT, V68, P369, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erw427 Jia HJ, 2005, POSTHARVEST BIOL TEC, V35, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.06.004 Johnson RS, 2008, ACTA HORTIC, V792, P385 Johnson RS, 2008, PEACH BOT PRODUCTION, P615 Kader AA, 1999, ACTA HORTIC, P203, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.485.27 KAMOTA F, 1988, JARQ-JPN AGR RES Q, V22, P107 Kelley KM, 2016, J SCI FOOD AGR, V96, P2451, DOI 10.1002/jsfa.7365 Kuden A. B., 1992,
  6. Doga, Turk Tarim ve Ormancilik Dergisi, V16, P50 Kuden AB, 2007, TURK 5 UL BAHC BITK, P702 Kuden AB, 2010, SEFTALI YETISTIRICIL, P25 Layne DR, 2013, J AM POMOL SOC, V67, P18 Layne DR, 2001,
  7. HORTTECHNOLOGY, V11, P234, DOI 10.21273/HORTTECH.11.2.234 Li Y, 2016, J INTEGR AGR, V15, P1267, DOI 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61374-6 Lopez G, 2008, ACTA HORTIC, V803, P175. Lopez G, 2007, CALIF AGR, V61, P31, DOI 10.3733/ca.v061n01p31 Marra FP, 2002, ACTA HORTIC, P523, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.592.70 Meitei SB, 2013, AFR J AGR RES, V8, P3558, DOI [10.5897/AJAR2013.7058, DOI 10.5897/AJAR2013.7058] Miller P., 2008, Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, V121, P43 Reighard GL, 2015, ACTA HORTIC, V1084, P75