Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 1999 / Cilt: 05 - Sayı: 02

Studies on the Quality Characteristics and Aerobic Stability of Wet Brewers Grains-Maize Mixture Silages

Yaş Bira Posası - Mısır Karışımı Silajlarda Kalite Özellikleri ve Aerobik Dayanı klılık Üzerinde Çalışmalar

Pages
69–76
Publication Date
1999-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Differences between the treatments for all parameters were significant P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to examine some quality characteristics and aerobic stability of wet brewers grains WBG and maize M mixture silages.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Treatments were WBG, M, mixture 1 K1 and mixture 2 K2 .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Differences between the treatments for all parameters were significant P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ya ş bira posas ı - m ı s ı r silaj ı · kalite · aerob ı k dayan ı kl ı l ı k

Abstract

This study was carried out to examine some quality characteristics and aerobic stability of wet brewers grains WBG and maize M mixture silages. Effects of different additives AIV, microbial inoculants on the pH changes of the mixtures also were monitored during the initial phase of the anaerobic fermentation. Treatments were WBG, M, mixture 1 K1 and mixture 2 K2 . Fresh WBG and fresh M materials were mixed with the ratio of 1/1 and 1/3 for the group of K1 and K2, respectively. The samples of treatments were stored for 75 days in the laboratory type PVC silos. After 75 days they were opened and left for seven days. During this seven day period temperature changes in the samples were monitored for determining aerobic stability. Crude protein, NH3-N, lactic acid content and pH value of the silages were found as 19.92 ± 0.033, 9.50 ± 0.009, 14.71 ± 0.103, 12.30 ± 0.048 %; 15.17 ± 0.033, 31.63 4- 0.219, 23.68 ± 0.015, 19.69 ± 0.035 g/ kg TN; 0.89 ± 0.035, 3.18 ± 0.035, 2.36 ± 0.035, 2.45 ± 0.035 %; 3.57 ± 0.034, 3.46 + 0.034, 3.29 ± 0.034 and 3.40 ± 0.034 for the group of VVBG, M, K1 and K2, respectively. Differences between the treatments for all parameters were significant P

Özet

Bu çal ışma, yaş bira posas ı YBP ve m ı s ı r M karışı mlar ı ndan yap ı lan silajlarda baz ı kalite özelliklerinin ve aerobik dayan ı kl ı l ığı n incelenmesi amac ı ile yürütülmü ştür. Çal ışmada ayr ı ca, farkl ı katk ı maddeleri AIV, mikrobiyal katk ı maddesi kullan ı m ı n ı n anaerobik fermantasyonun ba şlang ı ç faz ı nda karışı mlarda pH değ iş imi üzerindeki etkileri incelenmiştir. Çal ışmada deneme gruplar ı n ı YBP, mı s ı r, karışı m 1 K1 ve karışı m 2 K2 olu şturmuştur. YBP ve mı s ı r materyalleri ya ş ağı rl ı klar ı baz ı nda K1 grubunda 1/1 oran ı nda, K2 grubunda da 1/3 oran ı nda karış t ı rı larak silolanm ış t ı r. Deneme gruplar ı na ait materyallerin 75 gün süre ile laboratuvar tipi PVC silolarda sakland ığı çal ışmada, aç ı mlar sonras ı 7 gün süre ile aerobik dayan ı kl ı l ı k izlenmiştir. Ham protein, NH3-N, laktik asit içerikleri ve pH de ğerleri YBP, M, K1 ve K2 gruplar ı için s ı ras ı ile, %19.92 ± 0.033, 9.50 ± 0.009, 14.71 ± 0.103, 12.30 ± 0.048; 15.17 ± 0.033, 31.63 + 0.219, 23.68 ± 0.015, 19.69 ± 0.035 g/ kg TN; % 0.89 ± 0.035, 3.18 ± 0.035, 2.36 ± 0.035, 2.45 ± 0.035; 3.57 + 0.034, 3.46 ± 0.034, 3.29 ± 0.034 ve 3.40 ± 0.034 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Tüm özellikler bak ı m ı ndan gruplar aras ı nda gözlenen farkl ı l ı klar önemli bulunmu ştur P

🔖

Cite This Article

KOÇ, F., OZDÜVEN, M. L., YURTMAN, İ. .. Y. (1999). Studies on the Quality Characteristics and Aerobic Stability of Wet Brewers Grains-Maize Mixture Silages. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 05 - Sayı: 02, 69–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/179134

References (6)

  1. Aky ı ld ı z, A. R., 1984. Yemler Bilgisi Laboratuvar K ı lavuzu. Yay ı n No: 895, Uygulama Kı lavuzu No: 213, A.Ü. Bas ı mevi Ankara, 236 s. Akyildiz, A. R., 1986. Yemler Bilgisi ve Teknolojisi. A.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Yay ı nları: 974 Ders Kitab ı 286 Ankara, 411 s. Alçiçek, A. ve K. Özkan, 1997. Silo yemlerinde fiziksel ve kimyasal yöntemlerle silaj kalitesinin saptanmas ı. Türkiye Silaj Kongresi, Bursa, 241-247 s. Ailen, W. R., K. R. Stevenson and J.G. Buchanan-Smith, 1975. Influence of additives on short-term preservation of wet brewers grains stored ı n uncovered piles. Can.J.Anim.Sci. 55:609-618.
  2. Ailen, W. R. and K. R. Stevenson, 1975. Influence of additives on the ensiling process of wet brewers grains. Can.J.Anim.Sci. 53:391-402. Anonymous, 1986. The Analysis of Agricultural Materiais. Reference Book:427, London, 248 p. Anonymous, 1989. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 157 p. Chen, J., M. R. Stokes and C.R. Wallace, 1994. Effects of enzyme-inoculant systems on preservation and nutritive value of hay crop and corn silages. J. Dairy Sci., 77: 501-512
  3. Davies, D. R., R. J., Merry, A. P., Williams, E. L., Bakewell and D.K., Leemans, J. K S., Tweed, 1998. Proteolysis during ensilage of forages vary ı ng in solubie sugar content, J. Dairy Sci, 81, 444-453
  4. Dixon, R. and J. Combellas, 1983. A nota on preservation of wet brewers grains. Trop. Anim. Prod. 8:151. Erman, M. S. ve I. Y. Yurtman, 1998. Bira posas ı silajlar ı nda katk ı maddesi olarak laktik asit bakteri kullan ı min ı n kalite üzerine etkileri. Tar ı m Bilimleri Dergisi 4 (2): 55-57.
  5. Kı liç, A., 1986. Silo Yemi (O ğ'retim, ö ğ renim ve Uygulama önerileri). Bilgehan Bas ı mevi, izmir, 327 s. McDonald, P., N. Henderson and S. Heron, 1991. The Biochemistry of Silage. Chalcombe Pub., Marlow, 340 p. Merry, R. J., R. F. Cussen and R. Jones, 1993. Biological silage additives. Ciencia E Investigation Agraria. 20 (2): 2-29.
  6. Petterson, K., 1988. Ensiling of forages: Factors affecting silage fermentation and quality. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of Animal Nutrition and Management„ Uppsala, 46 p. Phipps, R. H., J. D. Sutton and B. A. Jones, 1995. Forage mixtures for dairy cows: The effect on dry-matter intake and milk production of ı ncorporating either fermente ıd or urea-treated whole-crop wheat, brewers grains, fodder beet or maize silage into diets based on grass silage. Animai Science. 61:491-496. Rob