Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

Borçka Barajı Rezervuarında Yeni Oluşmuş Bir Sediment Birikim Sahasındaki Penetrasyon Direnç Değerlerinin Uzaysal Dağılımı

Pages
298–308
Publication Date
2017-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The same study may be repeated with more variables to understand mechanisms behind development and extent of spatial variation in these newly deposited sediments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to analyze vertical and horizontal spatial variability of penetration resistance (PR) in recently deposited sediments at Borçka Dam reservoir.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ninety-one grids with 50 m by 10 m were located and PR was measured to a depth 80 cm by 10 cm increment (8 layers) within each grid.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The same study may be repeated with more variables to understand mechanisms behind development and extent of spatial variation in these newly deposited sediments.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Compaction · Geostatistics · Kriging

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze vertical and horizontal spatial variability of penetration resistance (PR) in recently deposited sediments at Borçka Dam reservoir. Ninety-one grids with 50 m by 10 m were located and PR was measured to a depth 80 cm by 10 cm increment (8 layers) within each grid. Spatial variation of PR was assessed by geostatistical techniques in all 8 layers. Semivariograms of PR were constructed for all the layers and corresponding kriging maps were built. The PR values were greater in surface layer (0-10 cm) and gradually decreased by depth. Mean PR was greatest (0.747 MPa) in surface layer and lowest (0.413 MPa) in 61-70 cm (layer 7). Results from exploratory statistics and geostatistical analyses showed that the PR values were more variable in surface layer compared to those in deeper layers due to that the surface layer was drier at the sampling and that affected by environmental factors in a greater extent. All the studied layers exhibited differences in spatial variation of PR as sill, nugget, and range values of corresponding semivariograms and kriging-predicted surface maps showed. The shortest geostatistical range (40.8 m) occurred of surface layer while longest (173.3 m) occurred for second layer (11-20 cm). The nugget effect was greatest (44%) in third layer (21-30 cm) while lowest (13%) in the surface layer. The same study may be repeated with more variables to understand mechanisms behind development and extent of spatial variation in these newly deposited sediments.

🔖

Cite This Article

Turgut, B., Özalp, M., Öztaş, T. (2017). Borçka Barajı Rezervuarında Yeni Oluşmuş Bir Sediment Birikim Sahasındaki Penetrasyon Direnç Değerlerinin Uzaysal Dağılımı. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 298–308. https://ajindex.com/articles/178660

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akıncı H, Yavuz Özalp A & Turgut B (2013). Agricultural land use suitability analysis using GIS and AHP technique. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 97: 71-82 Arega F & Hayter E (2008). Coupled consolidation and contaminant transport model for simulating migration of contaminants through the sediment and a cap. Applied Mathematical Modelling 32: 2413-2428
  2. Bravard J-P, Goichot M & Tronchère H (2014). An assessment of sediment-transport processes in the Lower Mekong River based on deposit grain sizes, the CM technique and flow-energy data. Geomorphology 207: 174-189
  3. Buchanan S J, So H B, Kopittke P M & Menzies N W (2010). Influence of texture in bauxite residues on void ratio, water holding characteristics, and penetration resistance. Geoderma 158: 421-426
  4. Cabezas A, Angulo-Martínez M, Gonzalez-Sanchís M, Jimenez J J & Comín F A (2010). Spatial variability in floodplain sedimentation: The use of generalized linear mixed-effects models. Hydrology and Earth System Science 14: 1655-1668
  5. Cambardella C A, Moorman T B, Novak J M, Parkin T B, Karlen D L, Turco R F & Konopka A E (1994). Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58: 1501-1511
  6. Chien Y J, Lee D Y, Guo H Y & Houng K H (1997). Geostatistical analysis of soil properties of mid-west Taiwan soils. Soil Science 162: 291-297
  7. Conklin A R (2005). Introduction to Soil Chemistry: Analysis and Instrumentation. Wiley, Hoboken NJ, USA Dane J H, Topp C, Campbell G S, Horton R, Jury W A, Nielsen D R, van Es H M, Wierenga P J & Topp G C (2002). Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 4-Physical methods. Soil Since Society of America, Inc, Madison WIS, USA de Groot A V, Veeneklaas R M, Kuijper D P J & Bakker J P (2011). Spatial patterns in accretion on barrierisland salt marshes. Geomorphology 134: 280-296
  8. Dexter A R, Kroesbergen B & Kuipers H (1984). Some mechanical properties of aggregates of top soils from the Ijsselmeer polders. 2: Remolded soil aggregates and the effects of wetting and drying cycles. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Sciences 32: 215-227 Ecemis N & Karaman M (2014). Influence of non-/low plastic fines on cone penetration and liquefaction resistance. Engineering Geology 181: 48-57 Ersahin S & Brohi A R (2006). Spatial variation of soil water content in topsoil and subsoil of a Typic Ustifluvent. Agricultural Water Management 83: 79-86
  9. Gamma Design Software (2014). GS+Version 10. Geostatistics for the Environmental Sciences User’s Guide.