SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

A Prototype Downdraft Gasifier Design with Mechanical Stirrer for Rice Straw Gasification and Comparative Performance Evaluation for Two Different Airflow Paths

İbrahim Savaş DALMIŞ
Birol KAYİŞOĞLU
Serkan TUĞ
Türkan AKTAŞ
Mehmet Recai DURGUT
Figen DAŞÇI DURGUT
Pages
329–339
Publication Date
2018-09-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

H2/CO ratio was found as 1.385 which was higher than the air inlet from tuyeres.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, a prototype downdraft throatless gasifier was designed with a mechanical stirrer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The diameter of the reactor was 350 mm and a nominal value for the heat power of biomass input was 70 kW.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:H2/CO ratio was found as 1.385 which was higher than the air inlet from tuyeres.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biomass gasification · Rice straw · Stirrer

Abstract

In this research, a prototype downdraft throatless gasifier was designed with a mechanical stirrer. The gasifier was designed for gasification of rice straw pellets. The diameter of the reactor was 350 mm and a nominal value for the heat power of biomass input was 70 kW. Rice straws which were collected from Thrace Region of Turkey gasified for determination of the designed gasifier performance in Namik Kemal University Biosystem Engineering Laboratories. The effects of airflow path and stirring process on the gasification efficiency during the gasification process were investigated. Temperatures and airflow rates observed and adjusted by controlling the air flow rate in the automation system constantly. Pellets were gasified using two different airflow paths with the same equivalence ratio of 0.2 and these were compared. Air inlet from the top showed better results than air inlet from tuyeres. For the air inlet from the top, the higher heating value of producer gas was determined as 5.047 MJ Nm-3 and cold gas efficiency was calculated as 65.4%. H2/CO ratio was found as 1.385 which was higher than the air inlet from tuyeres.

🔖

Cite This Article

DALMIŞ, İ. S., KAYİŞOĞLU, B., TUĞ, S., AKTAŞ, T., DURGUT, M. R., DURGUT, F. D. (2018). A Prototype Downdraft Gasifier Design with Mechanical Stirrer for Rice Straw Gasification and Comparative Performance Evaluation for Two Different Airflow Paths. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 329–339. https://ajindex.com/articles/178617

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Anis S & Zainal Z A (2011). Tar reduction in biomass producer gas via mechanical, catalytic and thermal methods: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15(5): 2355-2377
  2. Anonymous (2017). Kiltas Refractory Materials Industry Inc. Refractory Materials, Concretes, Hycast® 70. Retrieved in March, 25, 2017, from http://www.kiltas. com.tr Balat M, Balat M, Kırtay E & Balat H (2009). Main routes for the thermo-conversion of biomass into fuels and chemicals. Part 2: Gasification systems. Energy Conversion and Management 50(12): 3158-3168
  3. Basu P (2013). Biomass gasification, pyrolysis and torrefaction: Practical design and theory. Academic press. ISBN 978-0-12-396488
  4. Demirbas A (2004). Combustion characteristics of different biomass fuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 30(2): 219-230
  5. Jain A K (2006). Design parameters for a rice husk throatless gasifier. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR Ejournal 8: Manuscript EE 05 012 Jain A K & Goss J R (2000). Determination of reactor scaling factors for throatless rice husk gasifier. Biomass and Bioenergy 18(3): 249-256
  6. Lin S K, Wang H P, Lin C J & Juch C (1998). A process development for gasification of rice husk. Fuel Processing Technology 55(3): 185-192
  7. Ma Z, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Qu Y, Zhou J & Qin H (2012). Design and experimental investigation of a 190 kW e biomass fixed bed gasification and polygeneration pilot plant using a double air stage downdraft approach. Energy 46(1): 140-147
  8. Manguiat N A S, Marco O C, Miranda C M N, Moren K O & Magnaye R L R R C (2015). Design and development of a wood-fired gasifier prototype for synthesis gas production and analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 3(5): 160-166
  9. Mondal P, Dang G S & Garg M O (2011). Syngas production through gasification and cleanup for downstream applications-recent developments. Fuel Processing Technology 92(8): 1395-1410
  10. Nwokolo N, Mamphweli S & Makaka G (2016). An investigation into heat recovery from the surface of a cyclone dust collector attached to a downdraft biomass gasifier. Applied Thermal Engineering 98: 1158-1164 Patra T K & Sheth P N (2015). Biomass gasification models for downdraft gasifier: A state-of-the-art review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 50: 583-593 Reed T B & Das A (1988). Handbook of Biomass Downdraft Gasifier Engine Systems. Solar Technical Information Program Operated for U.S. Energy Department, Colorado Striūgas N, Zakarauskas K, Džiugys A, Navakas R & Paulauskas R