As the means of getting data " Project Unique Test" and "Physical and Motor Proficiency Test" which has been suggested by Hastad and Lacy (1989) have been used.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study that has been planned with the purpose to determine the differences between educable mentally retarded (EMR) children and their normally developed peers by studying their strengths, coordinations and flexibility and to present the results to physical educator and child developer has been carried out on totally 313 (156 EMR children and 157 children with normal development).
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study that has been planned with the purpose to determine the differences between educable mentally retarded (EMR) children and their normally developed peers by studying their strengths, coordinations and flexibility and to present the results to physical educator and child developer has been carried out on totally 313 (156 EMR children and 157 children with normal development).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As the means of getting data " Project Unique Test" and "Physical and Motor Proficiency Test" which has been suggested by Hastad and Lacy (1989) have been used.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Eğitilebilir zihinsel engelli çocuk · özel beden eğitimi · fiziksel ve motor uygunluk
Abstract
This study that has been planned with the purpose to determine the differences between educable mentally retarded (EMR) children and their normally developed peers by studying their strengths, coordinations and flexibility and to present the results to physical educator and child developer has been carried out on totally 313 (156 EMR children and 157 children with normal development). As the means of getting data " Project Unique Test" and "Physical and Motor Proficiency Test" which has been suggested by Hastad and Lacy (1989) have been used.
Özet
Eğitilebilir zihinsel engelli (EZE) çocukların (12-18 yaş) kuvvet, koordinasyon ve esneklik gibi motor özelliklerini ve beden algılarını incelemek, normal gelişim gösteren (NGG) yaşıtları ile karşılaştırma yaparak aradaki farklılıkları ortaya koymak ve bu bilgileri çocuk gelişimci ve beden eğitimcilerin yararına sunabilmek amacıyla planlanan bu araştırma 156 EZE ve 157 NGG öğrenci olmak üzere toplam 313 çocuk üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak "Project Unique Test" ile Hastad ve Lacy'nin (1989) önerdikleri testlerden yararlanılarak oluşturulan "Fiziksel ve Motor Yeterlilik Testi" kullanılmıştır.
ÖZER, D., ARAL, N., ÖZER, K., GÜVENÇ, A., TATAR, N., HİNDİSTAN, E. (1999). COMPARASIONAL STUDY ON MOTOR PROFICIENCY OF EDUCABLE MENTALLY RETARDED CHILDREN AND THEIR NORMAL PEARS. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 3–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/17857
Krebs, P. L.(1995). Mental retardation. Adapted physical education and sport (Ed: J. P. Winnick).Human Kinetics Books Champaigne. 459 p., Illinois. Sinclaire, E. and Forness, S. (1983). Classification: educational issues.(Ed: L. Matson) Handbook of Mental Retardation. Pergaman Press, 171-176 p., New York. Mac Millian, D. L.(1988). Issues in mild mental retardation. Education & Training in Mental Retardation, 23; 273- 284. Sengstock, W. L. (1966). Physicall fitness of mentally retarded boys. Research Quarterly of the American Association for Health, Physicall Education and Recreation, 13, 113-120.
Rarick, G. L, Widdop, J. H., and Broadhead G. D. (1970) Physical fitness and motor performance of educable mentally retarded children. Exceptional Children, 36; 509-519.