Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Use of Principal Coordinate Analysis for Measuring GE Interactions in Rain-Fed Durum Wheat Genotypes

Pages
38–46
Publication Date
2019-03-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the results of principal coordinates analysis in general confirmed the breeding value of the genotypes, obtained on the basis of the yield stability evaluation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Genotype × environment interactions complicate selection of superior genotypes for narrow and wide adaptation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Multienvironment yield trials of twenty durum wheat genotypes were conducted at five locations of Iran (Gachsaran, Gonbad, Moghan, Ilam and Khorram abad) over four years (2009-2013).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the results of principal coordinates analysis in general confirmed the breeding value of the genotypes, obtained on the basis of the yield stability evaluation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009-2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Adaptation · Eenvironment · Interaction

Abstract

Genotype × environment interactions complicate selection of superior genotypes for narrow and wide adaptation. Multienvironment yield trials of twenty durum wheat genotypes were conducted at five locations of Iran (Gachsaran, Gonbad, Moghan, Ilam and Khorram abad) over four years (2009-2013). Combined ANOVA of yield data of the twenty environments (year/location combined) revealed highly significant differences among genotypes and environments as well as significant genotype-environment interaction indicated differential performance of genotypes over test environments. The GE interaction was examined using multivariate analysis technique as principal coordinate analysis (PCOA). According to grand means and total mean yield, test environments were grouped into two main groups as high mean yield (H) and low mean yield (L). There were eleven H test environments and nine L test environments which analyzed in the sequential cycles. For each cycle, both scatter point diagram and minimum spanning tree plot were drawn. The identified most stable genotypes with dynamic stability concept and based on the minimum spanning tree plots and centroid distances were G12 (3342 kg ha-1), G10 (3470.3 kg ha-1), G5 (3203.0 kg ha-1), and G1 (3263.5 kg ha-1), and therefore could be recommended for unfavorable or poor conditions. Genotypes G10 (3470.3 kg ha-1) and G9 (3404.2 kg ha-1) were located several times in the vertex positions of high cycles according to the principal coordinates analysis (PCOA) and therefore could be recommended for favorable or rich conditions. Finally, the results of principal coordinates analysis in general confirmed the breeding value of the genotypes, obtained on the basis of the yield stability evaluation.

🔖

Cite This Article

Asghari, A., Karimizadeh, R., Chinipardaz, R., Sofalian, O., Ghaffari, A., Shahbazi, K., Hosseinpour, T., Ghojog, H., Armion, M. (2019). Use of Principal Coordinate Analysis for Measuring GE Interactions in Rain-Fed Durum Wheat Genotypes. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 38–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/178501

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akcura M, Kaya Y & Taner, S (2009). Evaluation of durum wheat genotypes using parametric and nonparametric stability statistics. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 14(2): 111-122 Becker H C & Leon J (1988). Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding 101: 1-23
  2. FAOSTAT (2010). Data stat year 2015. Food Agriculture Organization, (http://faostat.fao.org/) verified 2 Feb. 2015.
  3. Rome, Italy Finlay K W & Wilkinson G N (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14: 742-754
  4. Flores F, Moreno M T, Martinez A & Cubero J I (1996). Genotype × environment interaction in faba bean: Comparison of AMMI and principal coordinate models. Field Crops Research 47: 117-127
  5. GENSTAT Committee (2009). GENSTAT 12 release 1, Reference Manual. Clarendon Press,
  6. Oxford, UK Gower J C (1966). Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53: 325-338
  7. Ibanmez M A, Direnzo M A, Samame S S, Bonamico N C & Poverene M M (2001). Genotype–environment interaction of lovegrass forage yield in the semi-arid region of Argentina. Journal of Agricultural Science 137: 329-336
  8. Ilker E, Geren H, Unsal R, Sevim I, Aykut Tonk F & Tosun M (2011). AMMI-biplot analysis of yield performances of bread wheat cultivars grown at different locations. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 16(1): 64-68
  9. Karimizadeh R, Asghari A, Chinipardaz R, Sofalian O & Ghaffari A (2016). Determining yield stability and model selection by AMMI method in rain-fed durum wheat genotypes. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 21(2): 174-183
  10. Karimizadeh R, Mohammadi M, Armion M, Shefazadeh M K & Chalajour H (2012a). Determining heritability, reliability and stability of grain yield and yield-related components in durum wheat (Triticum durum L.). Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 18(4): 595-607
  11. Karimizadeh R, Mohammadi M, Shefazadeh M K, Mahmoodi A A, Rostami B & Karimpour F (2012b). Relationship among and repeatability of ten stability indices for grain yield of food lentil genotypes in Iran. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 17(1): 51-61
  12. Karimizadeh R, Mohammadi M, Sabaghnia N, Mahmoodi A A, Roustami B, Seyyedi F & Akbari F (2013). GGE biplot analysis of yield stability in multi-environment trials of lentil genotypes under rainfed condition. Notulae Scientia Biologicae 5(2): 256-262
  13. Karimizadeh R, Mohammadi M, Sabaghnia N & Shefazadeh M K (2012c). Using Huehn's Nonparametric Stability Statistics to Investigate Genotype ×