Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Yield and Quality Response of Soybean to Full and Deficit Irrigation at Different Growth Stages under Sub-Humid Climatic Conditions

Yarı Nemli İklimde Farklı Gelişme Dönemlerinde Uygulanan Tam ve Kısıntılı Sulamanın Soya Fasulyesinin Verim ve Kalitesine Etkisi

Pages
129–144
Publication Date
2016-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it may be concluded that while VFPS treatment may be the best choice for maximum yield under local conditions, irrigation schedules should be reconsidered when water cost is high and/or water is scarce; in such cases, an irrigation schedule that includes water deficit at the vegetative development stage can be applied

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigated the yield and quality response of soybean [Glycine max L.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A rain-fed non-irrigated treatment and 13 different irrigation treatments 1 full and 12 deficit irrigations were applied to soybeans at four critical development stages: vegetative V , flowering F , pod formation P and seed enlargement S .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it may be concluded that while VFPS treatment may be the best choice for maximum yield under local conditions, irrigation schedules should be reconsidered when water cost is high and/or water is scarce; in such cases, an irrigation schedule that includes water deficit at the vegetative development stage can be applied
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kısıntılı sulama · Soya fasulyesi · Tane verimi

Abstract

This study investigated the yield and quality response of soybean [Glycine max L. Merr.] to full and deficit irrigation applied at different growth stages under sub-humid climate conditions over a two-year period. A rain-fed non-irrigated treatment and 13 different irrigation treatments 1 full and 12 deficit irrigations were applied to soybeans at four critical development stages: vegetative V , flowering F , pod formation P and seed enlargement S . Deficit irrigation had a significant effect on seed yield, crude oil content, crude protein content and various agronomic parameters. The highest seed yield 4004 kg ha-1 was obtained with full irrigation based on the replenishment of 100% of soil water depletion from a soil depth of 90 cm at 7-day intervals throughout the development period and the lowest 1974 kg ha-1 with the rain-fed treatment, with a 50.6% difference in average yield between full irrigation VFPS and rain-fed treatments. The rain-fed treatment also resulted in the lowest crude oil content 19.1% and the highest crude protein content 33.6% . As a result, it may be concluded that while VFPS treatment may be the best choice for maximum yield under local conditions, irrigation schedules should be reconsidered when water cost is high and/or water is scarce; in such cases, an irrigation schedule that includes water deficit at the vegetative development stage can be applied

Özet

Bu çalışmada, yarı nemli iklim koşulları altında iki yıl süreyle soya fasulyesinin farklı gelişme dönemlerinde uygulanan tam ve kısıntılı sulamaya verim ve kalite tepkileri araştırılmıştır. Deneme konularının oluşturulmasında soya fasulyesi bitkisinin dört kritik gelişme dönemi vejetatif; V, çiçeklenme; Ç, bakla oluşumu; B ve tane gelişimi; T dönemleri dikkate alınmıştır. Buna göre, 13 farklı sulama konusu 1 tam ve 12 kısıntılı sulama ve susuz konu olmak üzere 14 deneme konusu oluşturulmuştur. Çalışma sonuçlarına göre; kısıntılı sulama, soya fasulyesi tane verimi, yağ oranı, protein oranı ve belirli agronomik parametreler üzerine önemli düzeyde etki göstermiştir. En yüksek tane verimi 4004 kg ha-1 tam sulama konusundan VÇBT konusu, her 7 günde bir 0-90 cm derinliğindeki mevcut nemi tarla kapasitesine tamamlayacak miktarda sulama suyu uygulanması , en düşük tane verimi 1974 kg ha-1 , tam sulama konusu ile karşılaştırıldığında % 50.6 azalma ile susuz konudan elde edilmiştir. Ayrıca, en düşük yağ oranı % 19.1 ve en yüksek protein oranı % 33.6 susuz konuda ölçülmüştür. Sonuç olarak, VÇBT konusunun yarı-nemli iklim koşulları altında en yüksek tane verimine ulaşmak için en iyi seçim olabileceği, ancak su ücreti yüksek ve/veya su kıt olduğunda, sulama programlarının tekrar ele alınmasının gerektiği, böyle koşullarda, vejetatif gelişme döneminde su kısıntısına yönelik bir sulama programının uygulanabileceği belirlenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

CANDOĞAN, B. N., YAZGAN, S. (2016). Yield and Quality Response of Soybean to Full and Deficit Irrigation at Different Growth Stages under Sub-Humid Climatic Conditions. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 129–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/178497

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ashley D A & Ethridge W J (1978). Irrigation effects on vegetative and reproductive development of three soybeans cultivars. Agronomy Journal 70: 467-471 Bellaloui N & Mengistu A (2008). Seed composition is influenced by irrigation regimes and cultivar differences in soybean. Irrigation Science 26: 261- 268 Bos M G (1980). Irrigation efficiencies at crop production level. ICID Bulletin 29: 18-25
  2. Bos M G (1985). Summary of ICID definitions of irrigation efficiency. ICID Bulletin 34: 28-31
  3. Boyer J S (1982). Plant productivity and environment. Science 218: 443-448
  4. Brady R A, Stone L R, Nickell C D & Powers W L (1974). Water conservation through proper timing of soybean irrigation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 29: 266-268
  5. Calpten J A (1986). Genetic variability for agronomic traits in population containing Glycine soja germplasm. Crop Science 26: 681-686 Cox W J & Jolliff G D (1986). Growth and yield of sunflower and soybean under soil water deficits. Agronomy Journal 78: 226-230 De Costa W A & Shanmugathasan K N (2002). Physiology of yield determination of soybean under different irrigation regimes in the sub-humid zone of Sri Lanka. Field Crops Research 75: 23-35
  6. De Souza P I, Egli D B & Bruening W P (1997). Water stress during seed filling and leaf senescence in soybean. Agronomy Journal 89(5): 807-812
  7. Dogan E, Kirnak H & Copur O (2007). Deficit irrigations during soybean reproductive stages and CROPGRO- soybean simulations under semi-arid climatic conditions. Field Crops Research 103: 154-159 Doorenbos J & Kassam A H (1979). Yield Response to Water. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No: 33, FAO, Rome Doss B D, Pearson R W & Rogers H T (1974). Effect of soil water stress at various growth stages on soybean yield. Agronomy Journal 66(2): 297-299
  8. Eck H V, Mathers A C & Musick J T (1987). Plant water stress at various growth stages and growth and yield of soybeans. Field Crops Research 17: 1-16
  9. Evett S R, Howell T A, Schneider A D, Upchurch D R & Wanjura D F (2000). Automatic Drip Irrigation of Corn and Soybean. In: Proceedings of the 4th Decennial National Irrigation Symposium, 14-16
  10. November, Phoenix, AZ, USA, pp. 401-408
  11. Fageria N K, Baligar V C & Jones C A (1997). Growth and Mineral Nutrition of Field Crops. 2nd Ed. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York Foroud N, Mundel H H, Saindon G & Entz T (1993). Effect of level and timing of moisture stress on soybean yield components. Irrigation Science 13: 149-155 Hartwig E E & Kilen T C (1991). Yield and composition