Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

The Impact of Livestock Supports on Production and Income of the Beef Cattle Farms: A Case of Samsun Province, Turkey

Pages
117–129
Publication Date
2020-03-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that the farmers, who have larger land and herd, higher education level, keeping farm records, are mechanized and specialized in beef cattle breeding were more likely to benefit from livestock supports than their counterparts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although the beef cattle sector has been considerably supported during the last two decades, Turkey could not get its self-sufficiency yet.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The survey data was collected from randomly selected 171 cattle farms in Samsun province of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that the farmers, who have larger land and herd, higher education level, keeping farm records, are mechanized and specialized in beef cattle breeding were more likely to benefit from livestock supports than their counterparts.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Beef cattle breeding · Livestock supports · Impact assessment

Abstract

Although the beef cattle sector has been considerably supported during the last two decades, Turkey could not get its self-sufficiency yet. The objective of this case study was to examine the impacts of livestock supports on production and income of beef cattle farms. The survey data was collected from randomly selected 171 cattle farms in Samsun province of Turkey. The Treatment Effect Model was used to measure the impacts of livestock supports on beef meat production and gross profit of the farms. The results indicate that the farmers, who have larger land and herd, higher education level, keeping farm records, are mechanized and specialized in beef cattle breeding were more likely to benefit from livestock supports than their counterparts. The Treatment Effect Model highlights that livestock support has a statistically significant effect on the amount of beef meat produced whereas it has no statistically significant effect on the gross profits of the farms. The research recommended that the livestock supports are necessary for the sustainability of beef cattle farms. The farms should be encouraged to get records via Farm Accountancy Data Network and the record keeping farms should be supported by higher amounts.

🔖

Cite This Article

EROĞLU, N. A., BOZOĞLU, M., BİLGİÇ, A. (2020). The Impact of Livestock Supports on Production and Income of the Beef Cattle Farms: A Case of Samsun Province, Turkey. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 117–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/178378

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Acs S, Hanley N, Dallimer M, Gaston K J, Robertson P, Wilson P & Armsworth P R (2010). The effect of decoupling on marginal agricultural systems: Implications for farm incomes, land use and upland ecology. Land Use Policy 27(2): 550-563. https://doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.009.
  2. Aksoy A, Terin M & Keskin A (2012). Türkiye süt sığırcılığında ıslah ve destekleme politikalarının bölgesel etkileri üzerine bir araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 43(1): 59-64.
  3. Alhas Eroğlu N (2017). Samsun ilinde hayvancılık desteklerinin besi işletmelerinin üretim ve gelirlerine etkileri. PhD Thesis, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey. Angrist J D (2001). Estimation of limited dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors: Simple strategies for empirical practice. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 19(1): 2-28.
  4. Anonymous (2015). Kırmızı Et Stratejisi. Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Livestock, Ankara,
  5. Turkey. Anonymous (2016). http://www.tuketbir.org.tr/basin_detay.asp?gidenID=MzI=.
  6. Anonymous (2018). Kalkınma Bakanlığı, 11. Kalkınma Planı, Tarım ve Gıdada Rekabetçi Üretim, Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Ankara,
  7. Turkey. Aydın E, Can M F, Aral Y, Cevger Y & Sakarya E (2010). Türkiye’de canlı hayvan ve kırmızı et ithalatı kararlarının sığır besicileri üzerine etkileri. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi 81(2): 51-57. Bartolini F & Viaggi D (2013). The common agricultural policy and the determinants of changes in EU farm size. Land Use Policy 31: 126-135. http://doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.10.007.
  8. Breen J P, Hennessy T C & Thorne FS (2005).The effect of decupling on the decision to produce: An Irish case study. Food Policy 30(2): 129-144. http://doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.03.001. Çelik C & Sarıözkan S (2017). Kırşehir ili merkez ilçede sığır besiciliği yapan işletmelerin ekonomik analizi. Harran Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 6(1): 38-45. Chau N H & De Gorter H (2000). Disentangling the production and export consequences of direct farm income payments. In: American Agricultural Economics Association Meetings, July 30-August 2, No: 21854, Tampa, Florida. Demir N (2009). Destekleme politikalarının hayvancılık sektörü üzerine etkilerinin bölgesel karşılaştırmalı analizi. PhD Thesis, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey. Demir N & Yavuz F (2010). Hayvancılık destekleme politikalarına çiftçilerin yaklaşımlarının bölgelerarası karşılaştırmalı analizi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Zira