Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolics of Local Apple Cultivars Encountered along the Coastal Zone of Northeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey

Pages
471–478
Publication Date
2020-12-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Present findings revealed that local cultivars generally had 3-4 times greater antioxidant activity and total phenolics than the standard cultivars.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, antioxidant activity and total phenolics in fruit flesh and fruit flesh + skin tissue of local apple cultivars encountered along the coastal zone of Northeastern Anatolia Region (Turkey) and 5 standard cultivars were determined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In local cultivars, antioxidant activities (μmol Trolox equivalent (TE) antioxidant g fresh weight (fw)-1) varied between 0.17-1.70 in fruit flesh and between 0.35-1.55 in fruit flesh + skin tissue; in standard cultivars, the values varied between 0.24 (‘Royal Gala’) and 0.29 (‘Granny Smith’ and ‘Pink Lady’) in fruit flesh and between 0.27 (‘Jonagold’) and 0.61 (‘Royal Gala’) in fruit flesh + skin tissue.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Present findings revealed that local cultivars generally had 3-4 times greater antioxidant activity and total phenolics than the standard cultivars.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Apple · Trolox · Gallic acid equivalent

Abstract

In this study, antioxidant activity and total phenolics in fruit flesh and fruit flesh + skin tissue of local apple cultivars encountered along the coastal zone of Northeastern Anatolia Region (Turkey) and 5 standard cultivars were determined. In local cultivars, antioxidant activities (μmol Trolox equivalent (TE) antioxidant g fresh weight (fw)-1) varied between 0.17-1.70 in fruit flesh and between 0.35-1.55 in fruit flesh + skin tissue; in standard cultivars, the values varied between 0.24 (‘Royal Gala’) and 0.29 (‘Granny Smith’ and ‘Pink Lady’) in fruit flesh and between 0.27 (‘Jonagold’) and 0.61 (‘Royal Gala’) in fruit flesh + skin tissue. In local cultivars, total phenolics (Gallic acid equivalent (GAE) kg fw-1) varied between 53.26- 00.54 in fruit flesh and between 89.32-406.91 in fruit flesh + skin tissue; the values in standard cultivars varied between 56.30 (‘Royal Gala’) and 124.64 (‘Jonagold’) in fruit flesh and between 102.73 (‘Summerred’) and 198.72 (‘Jonagold’) in fruit flesh + skin tissue. Present findings revealed that local cultivars generally had 3-4 times greater antioxidant activity and total phenolics than the standard cultivars. Fruit flesh + skin tissue generally had greater antioxidant activity and total phenolics than the fruit flesh alone. However, the local apple cultivar of ‘Hemşin Elması’ had greater values of both parameters in fruit flesh than in fruit flesh + skin tissue.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOST, S. E., DUMANOĞLU, H., AYGÜN, A. (2020). Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolics of Local Apple Cultivars Encountered along the Coastal Zone of Northeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 471–478. https://ajindex.com/articles/178365

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Albayrak S, Sağdıç O & Aksoy A (2010). The assays used for assessing antioxidant capacities of herbal products and foods. Erciyes University Journal of Institue of Science and Technology 26(4): 401-409.
  2. Balasundram N, Sundram K & Samman S (2006). Phenolic compounds in plants and agri-industrial by-products:Antioxidant activity, occurrence, and potential uses. Food Chemistry 99: 191-203.
  3. Bohm V, Kschonsek J, Wolfram T & Stöckl A (2018). Polyphenolic compounds analysis of old and new apple cultivars and contribution of polyphenolic profile to the in vitro antioxidant capacity. Antioxidants (Basel) 7(1): 1-14.
  4. Drogoudi P D, Michailidis Z & Pantelidis G (2008). Peel and flesh antioxidant content and harvest quality characteristics of seven apple cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae 115: 149-153.
  5. Garcia O B, Castillo J, Marin F R, Ortuno A & Del Rio J A (1997). Uses and properties of Citrus flavonoids. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 45: 4505-4515. Imeh U, & Khokhar S (2002). Distribution of conjugated and free phenols in fruits: antioxidant activity and cultivar variations. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50(22): 6301-6306.
  6. Kevers C, Pincemail J, Tabart J, Defraigne J O & Dommes J (2011). Influence of cultivar, harvest time, storageconditions, andpeeling on the antioxidant capacity and phenolic and ascorbic acid contents of apples and pears. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59: 6165-6171.
  7. Khanizadech S, Tsao R, Rekika D, Yang R, Charles M T & Rupasinghe H P V (2008). Polyphenol composition and total antioxidant capacity of selected apple genotypes for processing. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 21: 396-401.
  8. Lachman J, Sulc M, Sus J & Pavlikova O (2006). Polyphenol content and antiradical activity in different apple varieties. Horticultural Science (Prague) 33(3): 95-102.
  9. Lee K W, Kim Y J, Kim D, Lee H J & Lee C Y (2003). Major phenolics in apple and their contribution to the total antioxidant capacity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51: 6516-6520.
  10. Manach C, Mazur A & Scalbert A (2005). Polyphenols and prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Current Opinions in Lipidology 16: 77-84.
  11. Margaret E, Shailaja A M & Rao V V (2015). Evaluation of antioxidant activity in different parts of Syzygium cumini (Linn.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 4(9): 372-379.
  12. Markowski J, Plocharski W & Mieszczakowska M (2007). Effect of cultivar and processing on phenolics and antioxidant activity of a