SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2017 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4

Do hand outcome measures reflect cultural influences?

ÇİĞDEM ÖKSÜZ
BURCU SEMİN AKEL
ORKUN TAHİR ARAN
Ilkem Ceren SIĞIRTMAÇ
A.Gürsel LEBLEBİCİOĞLU
Pages
325–330
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Open ended interviews should be irrevocable part of assessment process in order to describe a person-center treatment program.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the activities listed in DASH, MHQ, QuickDASH with theactivities listed in Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) in a Turkish patient populationwith hand injury.Methods: COPM questionnaire was administered to 163 participants (61 male and 102 female; mean age40.72± 13.70 years).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The activities that were stated in COPM were categorized and checked whether theywere present in DASH-T, MHQ, QuickDASH.Results: The highest rated stated activities were“carrying a heavy object” (39.2%), “cleaning the house”(25.7%) and“writing” (15.9%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Open ended interviews should be irrevocable part of assessment process in order to describe a person-center treatment program.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the activities listed in DASH, MHQ, QuickDASH with theactivities listed in Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) in a Turkish patient populationwith hand injury.Methods: COPM questionnaire was administered to 163 participants (61 male and 102 female; mean age40.72± 13.70 years). The activities that were stated in COPM were categorized and checked whether theywere present in DASH-T, MHQ, QuickDASH.Results: The highest rated stated activities were“carrying a heavy object” (39.2%), “cleaning the house”(25.7%) and“writing” (15.9%). DASH reflects 30% whereas MHQ and QuickDASH reflect 16.32% and 10.2%of the problematic activities, respectively.Conclusion: None of three questionnaires have satisfactory results for reflecting the problematic activities among hand injured Turkish people. Open ended interviews should be irrevocable part of assessment process in order to describe a person-center treatment program.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖKSÜZ, Ç., AKEL, B. S., ARAN, O. T., SIĞIRTMAÇ, I. C., LEBLEBİCİOĞLU, A. (2017). Do hand outcome measures reflect cultural influences?. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4, 325–330. https://ajindex.com/articles/178199

References (14)

  1. van de Ven-Stevens LA, Munneke M, Terwee CB, Spauwen PH, van der Linde H.Clinimetric properties of instruments to assess activities in patients with handinjury: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(1):151e169
  2. Che Daud AZ, Yau MK, Barnett F, Judd J. Occupation-based intervention in hand injury rehabilitation: experiences of occupational therapists in Malaysia. Scan JOccup Ther. 2015;23(1):57e66
  3. Schoneveld K, Wittink H, Takken T. Clinimetric evaluation of measurement tools used in hand therapy to assess activity and participation. J Hand Ther.2009;22(3):221e236
  4. Roley S, DeLany JV, Barrows C, Honaker D, Sava D, Talley V. Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process 2nd Edition. Bethesda, MD: The American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc; 2008
  5. Black RM. Cultural considerations of hand use. J Hand Ther. 2011;24(2): 104e111
  6. Hudak PL, Amadio P, Bombardier C. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH(disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602e608
  7. Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validitytesting of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg.1998;23(4):575e587
  8. Naidu SH, Panchik D, Chinchilli VM. Development and validation of the handassessment tool. J Hand Ther. 2009;22(3):250e257
  9. Giladi AM, Chung KC. Measuring outcomes in hand surgery. Clin Plast Surg.2013;40(2):313e322
  10. Düger T, Yakut E, Oksüz Ç, Y € orükan S, Bilgütay B, Ayhan Ç. Reliability and € validity of the Turkish version of the disabilities of the arm. Shoulder Hand (DASH) Questionnaire[Article in Turkish] Fizyoter Rehabil. 2006;17(3):99e107
  11. Oksüz Ç, Akel BS, Oskay D, Leblebicio € glu G, Hayran KM. Cross-cultural adap- tation, validation, and reliability process of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in a Turkish population. J Hand Surg. 2011;36(3):486e492
  12. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: CAOTPublications; 1998
  13. Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Jt Surg. 2005;87(5):1038e1046
  14. Dogan SK, Ay S, Evcik D, Baser O. Adaptation of Turkish version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rheuma