Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

A comparison of short term radiological alignment outcomes of the patient speciŞc and standard instrumentation for primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Pages
215–222
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Statistical analysis of theoutliers for femoral component sagittal, coronal and rotational positioning, tibial component sagittal andcoronal positioning and the overall mechanical axis were assessed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to review the radiological alignment outcomes of patient SpeciŞc(PS) cutting blocks and Standard Instrumentation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.Methods: We hypothesized that the use of PS techniques would signiŞcantly improve sagittal, coronaland rotational alignment of the prosthesis on short term.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We performed a systematic review and a metaanalysis including all the randomised controlled trials (RCT) using PS and standard (ST) total kneearthroplasty to date.Results: A total of 538 PS TKA and 549 ST TKA were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Statistical analysis of theoutliers for femoral component sagittal, coronal and rotational positioning, tibial component sagittal andcoronal positioning and the overall mechanical axis were assessed.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to review the radiological alignment outcomes of patient SpeciŞc(PS) cutting blocks and Standard Instrumentation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.Methods: We hypothesized that the use of PS techniques would signiŞcantly improve sagittal, coronaland rotational alignment of the prosthesis on short term. We performed a systematic review and a metaanalysis including all the randomised controlled trials (RCT) using PS and standard (ST) total kneearthroplasty to date.Results: A total of 538 PS TKA and 549 ST TKA were included in the study. Statistical analysis of theoutliers for femoral component sagittal, coronal and rotational positioning, tibial component sagittal andcoronal positioning and the overall mechanical axis were assessed. We found that there was no significant beneŞt from using PS instrumentation in primary knee arthroplasty to aid in the positioning ofeither the tibial or femoral components. Furthermore sagittal plane tibial component positioning wasworse in the PS than the traditional ST group.Conclusion: Our results suggest that at present PS instrumentation is not superior to ST instrumentationin primary total knee arthroplasty.Level of evidence: Level 1, Systematic review of therapeutic studies.© 2017 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

🔖

Cite This Article

ALCELİKA, I., BLOMŞELDA, M., OZTÜRKB, C., SONİ, A., CHARİTYC, R., ACORNLEYC, A. (2026). A comparison of short term radiological alignment outcomes of the patient speciŞc and standard instrumentation for primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 215–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/178192

References (13)

  1. Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB. Long-term survival analysis of a posterior cruciate retaining total condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;309:136e145
  2. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:26e34
  3. Huang NF, Dowsey MM, Ee E, et al. Coronal alignment correlates with outcome after total knee arthroplasty: five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplast. 2012;27:1737e1741
  4. Lombardi Jr AV, Berend KR, Adams JB. Patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2008 Sep;31(9):927e930
  5. Ng VY, DeClaire JH, Berend KR, Gulick BC, Lombardi Jr AV. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):99e107. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1996-6
  6. Mont MA, McGrath MS, Boyd B, Mitrick MF. Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Spencer BA1. Int Orthop. 2009 Dec;33(6):1571e1575
  7. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.2. The Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2006
  8. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
  9. Handoll MM, Elstub H, Elliot J, Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group. About the Cochrane Collaboration (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGS)). 2008 (4. Art. No: MUSKINJ.)
  10. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5(1):13
  11. Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kerens B, van der Weegen W, van Drumpt RA, Kort NP. Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Oct;21(10): 2206e2212
  12. Chareancholvanich K, Narkbunnam R, Pornrattanamaneewong C. A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement. Bone Jt J. 2013 Mar;95-B(3):354e359
  13. Hamilton WG, Parks NL. Patient-specific instrumentation does not shorten surgical time: a prospective, randomi