Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Endometrial Sampling in Endometrial Hyperplasia

Pages
37–40
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We consider that this will increase the success in diagnosis, and could change treatment options.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Endometrial hyperplasia is a premalignant lesion characterized with hyperplastic changes in endometrial gland and stromal structures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: Patients that diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia by endometrial biopsy and/or hysterectomy at Dicle University School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology between January 2006 and July 2014 were retrospectively evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We consider that this will increase the success in diagnosis, and could change treatment options.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Endometrial hyperplasia is a premalignant lesion characterized with hyperplastic changes in endometrial gland and stromal structures. Its incidence is not exactly known. This study evaluated the accuracy of endometrial sampling of the patients whose pathological results were endometrial hyperplasia and had undergone hysterectomy (paraffin sections). STUDY DESIGN: Patients that diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia by endometrial biopsy and/or hysterectomy at Dicle University School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology between January 2006 and July 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of endometrial biopsy to predict postoperative hysterectomy result were calculated. Discrete results in endometrial sampling and hysterectomy were recorded separately. Statistical analyses were conducted with corresponding appropriate methods. RESULTS: Mean ages of pre and postmenopausal patients were 42.6±4.8 (28-50) and 57.7±7.7 (50- 79) years, respectively. For the efficiency of endometrial sampling to predict definite pathologic diagnosis, sensitivity was 71.9%, specificity was 87.5%, positive predictive value was 79.3%, and negative predictive value was 82.3%. When the accuracy of endometrial sampling with the pathologic diagnosis was evaluated, 38 patients had accurate (47.5%), and 42 patients had discrete (52.5%) results. CONCLUSION: The presence of atypia determines the treatment in patients with endometrial hyperplasia. Hysterectomy should not be the first option in endometrial hyperplasia patients without atypia, and medical treatment and curettage options should be considered. Experienced staff should perform and evaluate endometrial samplings. We consider that this will increase the success in diagnosis, and could change treatment options.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞARANOĞLU, S., AĞAÇAYAK, E., HATİRNAZ, S., DEREGÖZÜ, A., ACET, M., YÜCE, E., KARAÇOR, T., İÇEN, M. S., EVSEN, M. S., GÜL, T. (2017). The Diagnostic Accuracy of Endometrial Sampling in Endometrial Hyperplasia. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 37–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/177752

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Kurman RJ, McConnell TG. Precursors of endometrial and ovarian carcinoma. Virchows Arch 2010 Jan;456(1):1-12
  2. Silverberg SG, Kurman RJ, Nogales F. Epithelial tumors and related lesions of endometrium. In: FA Tavassoli, MR Stratton, editors. Tumors of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. Lyon: IARC Press 2003:221-32
  3. Kurman RJ, Kaminski PF, Norris HJ. The behavior of endo metrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of ‘untreated’ hyperplasia in 170 patients. Cancer 1985 Jul 15;56(2):403-12
  4. Cavanagh D, Fiorica JV, Hoffman MS, Durfee J, Nicosia SV. Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: An institutional review. Cancer Control 1999 Jul;6 (4):354-60
  5. Stovall TG, Soloman SK, Ling FW. Endometrial sampling prior to hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1989 Mar;73 (3 Pt 1):405-9
  6. Stever MR, Farmer G, Hernandez E, Miyazawa K. Routi - ne prehysterectomy endometrial biopsy in a series of 523 women. J Am Osteopath Assoc 1986 Sep; 86 (9):558-60
  7. Butlerand JW, Carnovale DE. Section V, Surgery for Benign Gynecologic Conditions. In: Te Linde’s operative gynecology. 10th Edition, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven 2008;585-608
  8. Yumuşak ÖH, Erkılınç S, Kahyaoğlu S, Erkaya S, Şen yurt H. Evaluation of The Diagnostic Accuracy of Endo metrial Sampling Before Hysterectomy. JGON 2014;11(3):97- 100
  9. Baak JP, Qrbo A, van Diest PJ, Jiwa M, de Bruin P, Broeckaert M, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the morphometric D-score for prediction of the outcome of endometrial hyperplasias. Am J Surg Pathol 2001 Jul; 25(7):930-35
  10. Ricci E, Moroni S, Parazzini F, Surace M, Benzi G, Salerio B, et al. Risk factors for endometrial hyperplasia: results from a case-control study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002 May-Jun;12(3):257-60
  11. Horn LC, Meinel A, Handzel R, Einenkel J. Histo patho l o - gy of endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma: an update. Ann Diagn Pathol 2007 Aug;11(4):297-311
  12. Reed SD, Newton KM, Clinton WL, Epplein M, Garcia R, Allison K, et al. Incidence of endometrial hyperplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009 Jun; 200 (6):678.e1-6
  13. Allison KH, Reed SD, Voigt LF, Jordan CD, Newton KM, Garcia RL. Diagnosis endometrial hyperplasia: why is it so dif ficult to agree? Am J Surg Pathol 2008 May;32(5): 691-8
  14. Çakmak B, Nacar MC, Aysal T, Hısım Y, Demirtürk F. The Evaluation Of Hysterectomy Cases Performed For Benign Indications In Our Clinic. Gaziosmanpaşa Üni Tıp Fak Derg 2013;5(2):78-83
  15. Ercan Ö, Demir S, Dede S. Benign Nedenlerle Yapılan His te r