Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2008 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4

Effects of a Neem Sample on Protein Patterns of Bactrocera cucurbitae

Pages
415–419
Publication Date
2008-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Rf-values of separated proteins (peptides) were determined and compared to those of the untreated control.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) adults were reared with 5% honey solution, sugar, and protein-hydrolysate.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Twenty third-instar larvae of the same size and age were exposed to filter papers treated with varying doses of a neem sample in 90 mm diameter petri dishes for 24 h.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Rf-values of separated proteins (peptides) were determined and compared to those of the untreated control.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bactrocera cucurbitae · insect rearing · protein patterns

Abstract

Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) adults were reared with 5% honey solution, sugar, and protein-hydrolysate. Females were provided to lay eggs on larval rearing media in a bottle gourd. Twenty third-instar larvae of the same size and age were exposed to filter papers treated with varying doses of a neem sample in 90 mm diameter petri dishes for 24 h. A probit-mortality curve was drawn to determine the LC50 of the sample. LC50 dose of the sample was calculated as 5.6%. Thin layer chromatography was used to determine the effects of neem sample on the protein patterns of the treated insect. The Rf-values of separated proteins (peptides) were determined and compared to those of the untreated control.

Özet

Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) adults were reared with 5% honey solution, sugar, and protein-hydrolysate. Females were provided to lay eggs on larval rearing media in a bottle gourd. Twenty third-instar larvae of the same size and age were exposed to filter papers treated with varying doses of a neem sample in 90 mm diameter petri dishes for 24 h. A probit-mortality curve was drawn to determine the LC50 of the sample. LC50 dose of the sample was calculated as 5.6%. Thin layer chromatography was used to determine the effects of neem sample on the protein patterns of the treated insect. The Rf-values of separated proteins (peptides) were determined and compared to those of the untreated control.

🔖

Cite This Article

YASMIN, N., KHAN, M. F., CHANNA, M. S., ALI, Z. (2008). Effects of a Neem Sample on Protein Patterns of Bactrocera cucurbitae. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4, 415–419. https://ajindex.com/articles/177616

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Agarwal, M.L., Sarma, D.D. and Raman, O. 1987. Melon fruit fly and its control. Indian Horticulture 32: 10-11.
  2. Ahmed, S.O. and Naqvi, S.N.H. 1985. Toxicity and effects of Dimilin on protein pattern of Aedes aegypti. Proc. Entomol. Soc. 14&15: 119-132.
  3. Akhtar, K., Naqvi, S.N.H. and Azmi, M.A. 1987. Insect growth regulating effect of tetranotripenoid (NID) and 3rd instar larvae of Musca domestica. Pak. J. Entomol. 2: 27-33. Board on Science and Technology for International Development (BOSTID). 1992. Neem: A Tree for solving Global Problem. USA, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington D.C. PP.141. Dhillon, M.K., Singh, R., Naresh, J.S. and Sharma, H.C. 2005.
  4. The melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae: A review of its biology and management. 16pp. Journal of Insect Science 5: 40, available online: insectscience.org/5.40 Finney, D.J. 1964. Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press,
  5. Cambridge. Ganesaligan, V.K. 1993. Effects of neem derivatives on larvae of Plutella xylostella in low volume application. Pak. J. Entomol. 8: 47-55.
  6. Jahan, M., Ahmed, I. and Naqvi, S.N.H. 1990. Toxicity of Juliflorine and Margosan-O™ against 3rd instar larvae of Musca domestica L. and its after effect on Morphogenesis. Proc. Pakistan Congr. Zool. 10: 293-300.
  7. Khan, M.F. and Ahmed, S.M. 2000. Toxicity of neem fruit extract & seed oil against Oxycarenus sp. (Heteroptera) pest of cotton crop. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia (Zoologica), Poland. 42: 17-21.
  8. Khan, M.F. and Ahmed, S.M. 2003. Comparative Toxicity of neem fruit extract and Cypermethrin against Tribolium confusum H. and Papilio demoleus L. Philippine J. Sci. 132:109-114.
  9. Khan, M.F., Ahmed. I., Jahan, M., Yasmin, N., Qadri, S.S. and Naqvi, S.N.H. 2007. Toxicological studies of Methoprene (ZR 515) and Dicrotophos as compared to neem extract RB-b and estimation of cholinesterase against Drosophila melanogaster M. J. Exp. Zool., India 10: 121-124.
  10. Khan, M.F., Khan, M.Z., Azmi, M.A. and Qadri, S.S. 1999. An introduc- tion to teratogenic effects of gamma radiation for fruit flies control. Al-Hayat 4: 53-54.
  11. Munir, A., Yasmin, N., Tabassum, R., Naqvi, S.N.H. and Tasneem, S. 1997. Toxicity of SDS and BF (plant extracts) in comparison with Cypermethrin against 3rd instar larvae of citrus butterfly. Pakistan J. Entomol., Karachi. 12: 23-28.
  12. Naqvi, S.N.H. 1996. Prospects and development of a neem based pesticide in Pakistan. Proc. Pakistan Congr. Zool. 16: 325-338.
  13. Naqvi, S.N.H. and Aslam, M. 1996. Phagodeterrent ef