SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2007 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Food Preference of the Short-Eared Owl (Asio flammeus) and Barn Owl (Tyto alba) at Usta Muhammad, Baluchistan, Pakistan

Muhammad MUSHTAQ-UL-HASSAN
Rafia Rehana GHAZI
Noor-un NISA
Pages
91–94
Publication Date
2007-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Sub-adults of M. meltada were the most intensively eaten food item by the short-eared owl (50.8%) and barn owl (39.1%), whereas adults of M. musculus were the dominant prey age-category consumed by the short-eared owl (52.2%) and barn owl (66.0%)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The dominant food-items eaten by the short-eared owl were rats and mice (91.9%).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Shrews (2.0%), bats (1.3%), and birds (5.0%) jointly constituted only 8.2% of the owl's diet.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Sub-adults of M. meltada were the most intensively eaten food item by the short-eared owl (50.8%) and barn owl (39.1%), whereas adults of M. musculus were the dominant prey age-category consumed by the short-eared owl (52.2%) and barn owl (66.0%)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Diet · soft-furred field rat · house mouse

Abstract

The dominant food-items eaten by the short-eared owl were rats and mice (91.9%). Shrews (2.0%), bats (1.3%), and birds (5.0%) jointly constituted only 8.2% of the owl's diet. Among rats and mice, the most intensively consumed rodent pest by the owl was Millardia meltada (43.9%), followed by Mus musculus (29.8%), Tatera indica (16.3%), and Bandicota bengalensis (1.8%). In the case of the barn owl, rats and mice represented 9.7% of their diet, followed by shrews (4.7%), birds (3.3%), and bats (0.4%). Among the rats and mice in their diet were M. meltada (46.3%), T. indica (3.5%), Nesokia indica (5.1%), B. bengalensis (2.2%), Rattus rattus (1.1%), and M. musculus (33.5%). Sub-adults of M. meltada were the most intensively eaten food item by the short-eared owl (50.8%) and barn owl (39.1%), whereas adults of M. musculus were the dominant prey age-category consumed by the short-eared owl (52.2%) and barn owl (66.0%)

Özet

The dominant food-items eaten by the short-eared owl were rats and mice (91.9%). Shrews (2.0%), bats (1.3%), and birds (5.0%) jointly constituted only 8.2% of the owl's diet. Among rats and mice, the most intensively consumed rodent pest by the owl was Millardia meltada (43.9%), followed by Mus musculus (29.8%), Tatera indica (16.3%), and Bandicota bengalensis (1.8%). In the case of the barn owl, rats and mice represented 9.7% of their diet, followed by shrews (4.7%), birds (3.3%), and bats (0.4%). Among the rats and mice in their diet were M. meltada (46.3%), T. indica (3.5%), Nesokia indica (5.1%), B. bengalensis (2.2%), Rattus rattus (1.1%), and M. musculus (33.5%). Sub-adults of M. meltada were the most intensively eaten food item by the short-eared owl (50.8%) and barn owl (39.1%), whereas adults of M. musculus were the dominant prey age-category consumed by the short-eared owl (52.2%) and barn owl (66.0%)

🔖

Cite This Article

MUSHTAQ-UL-HASSAN, M., GHAZI, R. R., NISA, N. (2007). Food Preference of the Short-Eared Owl (Asio flammeus) and Barn Owl (Tyto alba) at Usta Muhammad, Baluchistan, Pakistan. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 91–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/177571

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Baker, J.A. and Brooks, R.J. 1981. Raptor and vole populations at an airport. J. Wildl. Manage. 45: 390-396.
  2. Baker, J.A. and Brooks, R.J. 1982. Impact of raptor predation on a declining vole population. J. Mammal. 63: 297-260.
  3. Buckley, J. and Goldsmith, J. 1975. The prey of barn owl (Tyto alba) in East Norfolk. Mammal. Rev., 5: 13-16.
  4. Colvin, B.A. and Spaudling, S.R. 1983. Winter foraging behaviour of short-eared owls. Am. Midl. Nat. 111: 124-128.
  5. DeBruijin, O. 1980. Feeding ecology of the barn owl (Tyto alba) in the Netherlands. Limosa. 52: 91-154.
  6. Derting, T.L. and Cranford, J.A. 1989. Physical and behavioral correlates of prey vulnerability to barn owl (Tyto alba) predation. Am. Midl. Nat. 121: 11-20.
  7. Duncan, DB. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F-test. Biometrics. 11: 1-42.
  8. Glue, D. E. 1975. Harvest mice as barn owl (Tyto alba) prey in the British Isles. Mammal. Rev. 1: 9-12.
  9. Herrera, C.M. and Jaksic, F.M. 1980. Feeding ecology of the barn owl (Tyto alba) in central Chile and Southern Spain: A Comparative Study. Auk. 97: 760-767.
  10. Iqbal, H.M. 1975. Evaluation of the degree of tooth wear and morphometric changes as a criterion of determining age groups in soft-furred field rat (Millardia meltada). M.Sc. Thesis Dept. Zool. Univ. of Agri. Lyallpur. 60 pp. Longland, W.S. and Jenkins, S.H. 1987. Sex and age affect vulnerability of desert rodents to owl predation. J. Mammal.68: 746-754.
  11. Machniak, A. and Feldhamer, G. 1993. Feeding habits of short-eared owl over wintering in Southern Illinois. Trans. Ill State Acad. Sci. 86: 79-82.
  12. Mahmood-ul-Hassan, M., Beg, M.A. and Ali, H. 2000. Diet of the barn owl (Tyto alba) in central Punjab (Pakistan). Pak J Zool. 32: 33- 39. Moehlman, P.D. 2003. Grizmek's Animal Life Encyclopedia. Mammals IV. Detroit, The Gale Group, Inc. 15. Palmer, M.J. 1982. Short-eared owl apparently feeding on snail. Br. Birds. 75: 131. Rana, S.A. 1975. A comparative study of the breeding cycle, reproduction, population structure and abundance of Mus spp. in Lyallpur district and vicinity. M.Sc. Thesis. Dept. Zool. Univ. of Agri. Lyallpur. 55 pp. Roberts, J.L. and Bowman N. 1986. Diet and ecology of short-eared owl (Asio flammeus) breeding on Welsh Heather Moor. Bird Study. 33: 12-17.
  13. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, T.H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. New York. Walsh, P.M. and Sleeman, D.M. 1988 Avian prey of a wintering short- eared owl population in south-west Ireland. Ir. Birds. 3: 589-95.
  14. Zamarano, E.