Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2013 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1

Assessing the potential impact of nonnative fish on native fish by relative condition

Pages
84–91
Publication Date
2013-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results suggest that there was a possible impact of NNS on native species and that relative condition would provide an easy and useful alternative to get a preliminary evaluation of the impact of nonnative fish species as long as sampling follows proper methodology.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nonnative species (NNS) pose one of the most common threats to the conservation of biodiversity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to understand the impact of NNS on some common and endemic freshwater fishes, examining their relative conditions in the absence (allopatry) and presence (sympatry) of nonnative fish species from 3 different regions in the western part of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results suggest that there was a possible impact of NNS on native species and that relative condition would provide an easy and useful alternative to get a preliminary evaluation of the impact of nonnative fish species as long as sampling follows proper methodology.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Nonindigenous species · growth · endemic species

Abstract

Nonnative species (NNS) pose one of the most common threats to the conservation of biodiversity. Given the difficulty in measuring and documenting the specific impacts of introduced species on native species, indices of condition may provide an easy and inexpensive alternative. The aim of this study was to understand the impact of NNS on some common and endemic freshwater fishes, examining their relative conditions in the absence (allopatry) and presence (sympatry) of nonnative fish species from 3 different regions in the western part of Turkey. Data from 19 sites, a total of 1672 fish of 11 cyprinid species, were used for calculation of condition indices. Relative condition was significantly higher in allopatry than sympatry for Capoeta sieboldii, Gobio gobio, Ladigesocypris ghigii, Leucaspius delineatus, and Phoxinus phoxinus; however, it was higher in sympatry only for Rhodeus amarus, whereas Barbus tauricus, Cyprinus carpio, Rutilus rutilus, Squalius fellowesii, and S. pursakensis showed no significant differences in relative condition between allopatry and sympatry. Results suggest that there was a possible impact of NNS on native species and that relative condition would provide an easy and useful alternative to get a preliminary evaluation of the impact of nonnative fish species as long as sampling follows proper methodology.

Özet

Nonnative species (NNS) pose one of the most common threats to the conservation of biodiversity. Given the difficulty in measuring and documenting the specific impacts of introduced species on native species, indices of condition may provide an easy and inexpensive alternative. The aim of this study was to understand the impact of NNS on some common and endemic freshwater fishes, examining their relative conditions in the absence (allopatry) and presence (sympatry) of nonnative fish species from 3 different regions in the western part of Turkey. Data from 19 sites, a total of 1672 fish of 11 cyprinid species, were used for calculation of condition indices. Relative condition was significantly higher in allopatry than sympatry for Capoeta sieboldii, Gobio gobio, Ladigesocypris ghigii, Leucaspius delineatus, and Phoxinus phoxinus; however, it was higher in sympatry only for Rhodeus amarus, whereas Barbus tauricus, Cyprinus carpio, Rutilus rutilus, Squalius fellowesii, and S. pursakensis showed no significant differences in relative condition between allopatry and sympatry. Results suggest that there was a possible impact of NNS on native species and that relative condition would provide an easy and useful alternative to get a preliminary evaluation of the impact of nonnative fish species as long as sampling follows proper methodology.

🔖

Cite This Article

GAYGUSUZ, Ö., EMİROĞLU, Ö., TARKAN, A. S., AYDIN, H. (2013). Assessing the potential impact of nonnative fish on native fish by relative condition. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1, 84–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/177158

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. APHA, AWWA, WPCF. 1985. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th edition (Eds. A.E. Greenberg, R.R. Trussel, L.S. Clesceri and M.A.H. Franson). American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. Aydın, H., Gaygusuz, Ö., Tarkan, A.S., Top, N., Emiroğlu, Ö. and Gürsoy Gaygusuz, Ç. 2011. Invasion of freshwater bodies in Marmara region (northwestern Turkey) by nonnative gibel carp, Carassius gibelio (Bloch, 1782). Turk. J. Zool. 35: 829–836.
  2. Balık, İ., Özkök, R., Çubuk, H. and Uysal, R. 2004. Investigation of some biological characteristics of the silver crucian carp, Carassius gibelio (Bloch, 1782) population in Lake Eğirdir. Turk. J. Zool. 28: 19–28.
  3. Blackwell, B.G., Brown, M.L. and Willis, D.W. 2000. Relative weight (Wr) status and current use in fisheries assessment and management. Rev. Fish. Sci. 81: 1–44.
  4. Bohlin, T., Dellefors, C., Faremo, U. and Johlander, A. 1994. The energetic equivalence hypothesis and the relation between population density and body size in stream living salmonids. Am. Nat. 143: 478–493.
  5. Bİhn, T., Amundsen, P.A. and Sparrow, A. 2008. Competitive exclusion after invasion? Biol. Invasions 10: 359–368.
  6. Byers, J.E., Reichard, S., Randall, J.M., Parker, I.M., Smith, C.S., Lonsdale, W.M., Atkinson, I.A.E., Seastedt, T.R., Williamson, M., Chornesky, E. and Hayes, D. 2002. Directing research to reduce the impacts of nonindigenous species. Conserv. Biol. 16: 630–640.
  7. Copp, G.H. 2003. Is fish condition correlated with water conductivity? J. Fish Biol. 63: 263–266.
  8. Copp, G.H., Tarkan, A.S., Godard, M.J., Edmonds, N.J. and Wesley, K.J. 2010. Preliminary assessment of feral goldfish impacts on ponds, with particular reference to native crucian carp. Aquat. Invas. 5: 413–422.
  9. Cucherousset, J., Copp, G.H., Fox, M.G., Sterud, E., van Kleef, H.H., Verreycken, H. and Záhorská, E. 2009. Life-history traits and potential invasiveness of introduced pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus populations in northwestern Europe. Biol. Invas. 11(9): 2171–2180.
  10. Cucherousset, J. and Olden, J.D. 2011. Ecological impacts of nonnative freshwater fishes. Fisheries 36: 215–230.
  11. Darwall, W., Smith, K., Allen, D., Seddon, M., Reid, G.M., Clausnitzer, V. and Kalkman, V.C. 2008. Freshwater biodiversity – a hidden resource under threat. In: Wildlife in a Changing World: An Analysis of the 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Eds. J.C. Vie, C. Hilton-Taylor, S.N. Stuart). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, pp. 43–53.
  12. Fechhelm, R.G., Griffiths, W.B., Wilson, W.J