Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 5

The use of BMWP and ASPT indices for evaluation of water quality according to macroinvertebrates in Değirmendere Stream (Isparta, Turkey)

Pages
603–613
Publication Date
2014-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings also strongly indicate that these indices should be adapted based on the geomorphological and environmental features of Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out between March 2011 and February 2012 on Değirmendere Stream in order to determine the water quality of the stream, and to investigate the environmental quality and the applicability of both the Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP; Original, Spanish, Hungarian, Czech, and Polish versions) and Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT; Original, Hungarian, and Czech versions) indices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result, a total of 59 taxa were detected: 4 taxa from Gastropoda, 1 taxon from Bivalvia, 1 taxon from Oligochaeta, 1 taxon from Hirudinea, 2 taxa from Crustacea, and 50 taxa from Insecta.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings also strongly indicate that these indices should be adapted based on the geomorphological and environmental features of Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Değirmendere Stream · water quality · BMWP

Abstract

This study was carried out between March 2011 and February 2012 on Değirmendere Stream in order to determine the water quality of the stream, and to investigate the environmental quality and the applicability of both the Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP; Original, Spanish, Hungarian, Czech, and Polish versions) and Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT; Original, Hungarian, and Czech versions) indices. The biotic and diversity indices were applied using the ASTERICS software program. As a result, a total of 59 taxa were detected: 4 taxa from Gastropoda, 1 taxon from Bivalvia, 1 taxon from Oligochaeta, 1 taxon from Hirudinea, 2 taxa from Crustacea, and 50 taxa from Insecta. The water quality of Değirmendere Stream was found to be unpolluted/slightly polluted according to the physicochemical data and the different versions of the BMWP and ASPT. However, the score values of the different versions of the BMWP were different from each other because the versions of the BMWP were adapted based on the geological and ecological features of their source countries. The results of this study suggest that there is still a need for much intensive investigation and further testing of the effectiveness of the BMWP and ASPT indices for use in the streams of Turkey. The findings also strongly indicate that these indices should be adapted based on the geomorphological and environmental features of Turkey.

Özet

This study was carried out between March 2011 and February 2012 on Değirmendere Stream in order to determine the water quality of the stream, and to investigate the environmental quality and the applicability of both the Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP; Original, Spanish, Hungarian, Czech, and Polish versions) and Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT; Original, Hungarian, and Czech versions) indices. The biotic and diversity indices were applied using the ASTERICS software program. As a result, a total of 59 taxa were detected: 4 taxa from Gastropoda, 1 taxon from Bivalvia, 1 taxon from Oligochaeta, 1 taxon from Hirudinea, 2 taxa from Crustacea, and 50 taxa from Insecta. The water quality of Değirmendere Stream was found to be unpolluted/slightly polluted according to the physicochemical data and the different versions of the BMWP and ASPT. However, the score values of the different versions of the BMWP were different from each other because the versions of the BMWP were adapted based on the geological and ecological features of their source countries. The results of this study suggest that there is still a need for much intensive investigation and further testing of the effectiveness of the BMWP and ASPT indices for use in the streams of Turkey. The findings also strongly indicate that these indices should be adapted based on the geomorphological and environmental features of Turkey.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZEYBEK, M., KALYONCU, H., KARAKAŞ, B., ÖZGÜL, S. (2014). The use of BMWP and ASPT indices for evaluation of water quality according to macroinvertebrates in Değirmendere Stream (Isparta, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 5, 603–613. https://ajindex.com/articles/176804

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akbulut M, Odabasi DA, Kaya H, Celik ES, Yildirim MZ, Odabasi S, Selvi K (2009). Changing of Mollusca fauna in comparison with water quality: Saricay Creek and Atikhisar Reservoir models (Canakkale-Turkey). J Anim Vet Adv 8: 2699–2707.
  2. Alba-Tercedor J, Sánchez-Ortega A (1988). A quick and simple method to evaluate biological quality of running fresh water based on Hellawell (1978). Limnetica 4: 51–56 (article in Spanish with an abstract in English). APHA (1998). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed. Washington, DC, USA: American Public Health Association. AQEM Consortium (2002). Manual for the Application of the AQEM System. A Comprehensive Method to Assess European Streams Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates, Developed for the Purpose of the Water Framework Directive. Duisburg, Germany: AQEM Consortium. Armitage PD, Moss D, Wright JF, Furse MT (1983). The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running- water sites. Water Res 17: 333–347.
  3. Balık S, Ustaoğlu MR, Özbek M, Yıldız S, Taşdemir A, İlhan A (2006). Determination of pollution at lower basin of Küçük Menderes River (Selçuk, İzmir) by using macro benthic invertebrates. Ege JFAS 23: 61–65.
  4. Barton DR, Metcalfe-Smith JL (1992). A comparison of sampling techniques and summary indices for assessment of water quality in the Yamaska River, Québec, based on benthic macroinvertebrates. Environ Monit Assess 21: 225–244.
  5. Başak E, Aygen C, Külköylüoğlu O (2014). Taxonomy, distribution, and ecology of crustacean zooplankton in trough waters of Ankara (Turkey). Turk J Zool 38: 1–10.
  6. Buss DF, Salles FF (2006). Using Baetidae species as biological indicators of environmental degradation in a Brazilian river basin. Environ Monit Assess 130: 365–372.
  7. Çabuk Y, Arslan N, Yılmaz V (2004). Species composition and seasonal variations of the Gastropoda in Upper Sakarya River System (Turkey) in relation to water quality. Acta Hydroch Hydrob 32: 393–400.
  8. Callisto M, Moreno P, Barbosa FAR (2001). Habitat diversity and benthic functional trophic groups at Serra do Cipó, southeast Brazil. Rev Bras Biol 61: 259–266.
  9. Camur-Elipek B, Arslan N, Kirgiz T, Oterler B (2006). Benthic macrofauna in Tunca River (Turkey) and their relationships with environmental variables. Acta Hydroch Hydrob 34: 360– 366. Capitulo AR, Tangorra M, Ocon C (2001). Use of benthic macroinvertebrates to assess the biological status of Pampean streams in