Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 5

Characterisation of chitin in the cuticle of a velvet worm (Onychophora)

Pages
416–424
Publication Date
2019-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This confirms and broadens the single previous study in which the presence of α-chitin in a velvet worm was demonstrated with a single analysis (X-ray diffraction).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We characterize the trunk cuticle of velvet worms of the Peripatoides novaezealandiae-group (Onychophora) using SEM, TEM, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:TEM and SEM revealed a relatively uniform organization of the delicate cuticle that is covered by numerous bristled and nonbristled papillae with ribbed scales arranged in transverse rows.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This confirms and broadens the single previous study in which the presence of α-chitin in a velvet worm was demonstrated with a single analysis (X-ray diffraction).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Chitin · Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy · thermogravimetric analysis

Abstract

We characterize the trunk cuticle of velvet worms of the Peripatoides novaezealandiae-group (Onychophora) using SEM, TEM, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). TEM and SEM revealed a relatively uniform organization of the delicate cuticle that is covered by numerous bristled and nonbristled papillae with ribbed scales arranged in transverse rows. The cuticle consists of a very thin multilayered epicuticle of varying appearance followed by the largely fibrous procuticle. The irregularly arranged nanofibres of isolated cuticular chitin seen by SEM are considered as bundles of chitin fibres. FT-IR and TGA showed that the chitin is of the α-type. This confirms and broadens the single previous study in which the presence of α-chitin in a velvet worm was demonstrated with a single analysis (X-ray diffraction).

🔖

Cite This Article

GREVEN, H., KAYA, M., SARGIN, İ., BARAN, T., KRISTENSEN, R. M., SØRENSEN, M. V. (2019). Characterisation of chitin in the cuticle of a velvet worm (Onychophora). Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 5, 416–424. https://ajindex.com/articles/176395

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Aguinaldo AM, Tubeville JM, Linford LS, Rivera MC, Garey JR et al. (1976). Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature 387: 489-493. doi: 10.1038/387489a0 Borner J, Rehm P, Schill RO, Ebersberger I, Burmester T (2014). A transcriptome approach to ecdysozoan phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 80: 79-87. doi: 10.1016/j. ympev.2014.08.001 Campbell LI, Rota-Stabelli O, Edgecombe GD, Marchioro T, Longhorn SJ et al. (2011). MicroRNAs and phylogenomics resolve the relationships of Tardigrada and suggest that velvet worms are the sister group of Arthropoda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 15920-15924. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105499108 Cuong HN, Minh NC, Hoa NV, Trung TS (2016). Preparation and characterization of high purity β-chitin from squid pens (Loligo chenisis). International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 93: 442-447. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.08.085 Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DO, Pang K, Browne WE et al. (2008). Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452: 745-749. doi: 10.1038/ nature06614 Greven H, Peters W (1986). Localization of chitin in the cuticle of Tardigrada using wheat germ agglutinin–gold conjugate as a specific electron-dense marker. Tissue and Cell 18: 297-304.
  2. Greven H, Kaya M, Baran T (2016). The presence of α-chitin in Tardigrada with comments on chitin in the Ecdysozoa. Zoologischer Anzeiger 264: 11-16. doi.org/10.1016/j. jcz.2016.06.003 Greven H, Kaya M, Junker K, Akyuz L, Amemiya C (2019). Characterization of tongue worm (Pentastomida) chitin supports α- rather than β-chitin. Zoologischer Anzeiger 279: 111-115.
  3. Hackman RH, Goldberg M (1975). Peripatus: Its affinities and its cuticle. Science 190: 582-583. doi: 10.1126/science.190.4214.582 Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A, Ott M, Rouse GW et al. (2009). Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B 276: 4261-4270. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0896 Jang MK, Kong BG, Jeong YI, Lee CH, Nah JW (2004). Physicochemical characterization of α-chitin, β-chitin, and γ-chitin separated from natural resources. Journal of Polymer Science A1 42: 3423-3432. doi: 10.1002/pola.20176 Jeuniaux C (1982). La chitine dans la règne animal. Bulletin de Société zoologique de France 107: 363-386 (article in French with an abstract in English). Karuppaswamy SA (1977). Occurrence of β-chitin in th