The distribution of C-heterochromatin regions in Turkish populations of M. emarginatus is similar to those reported in some other Myotis species.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the banded karyotypes C- and Ag-nucleolus organizer regions NORs of Myotis emarginatus in Turkey were determined for the first time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The karyotype contained 44 chromosomes, the number of chromosomal arms NF was 54, and the number of autosomal arms NFa was 50.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The distribution of C-heterochromatin regions in Turkish populations of M. emarginatus is similar to those reported in some other Myotis species.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Geoffroy’s bat · karyotype · chromosome
Abstract
In this study, the banded karyotypes C- and Ag-nucleolus organizer regions NORs of Myotis emarginatus in Turkey were determined for the first time. The karyotype contained 44 chromosomes, the number of chromosomal arms NF was 54, and the number of autosomal arms NFa was 50. Slight C-heterochromatic blocks were observed in the centromeric regions of some autosome pairs, whereas the sex chromosomes were euchromatic. The Ag-NORs were detected in the short arms of a large and a medium-sized acrocentric autosome. The distribution of C-heterochromatin regions in Turkish populations of M. emarginatus is similar to those reported in some other Myotis species.
ALBAYRAK, İ., SARIÇAM, T., ARSLAN, A. (2020). C-Heterochromatin and nucleolus organizer region distribution of Myotis emarginatus Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2, 195–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/176387
Albayrak İ, Aşan N (1999). Distributional status of the bats from Turkey. Communications of the Faculty of Sciences of the University of Ankara Series C 17: 59-68. doi: 10.1501/ Commuc_0000000094 Andō K, Tagawa T, Uchida TA (1980). The C-banding pattern of 6 Japanese species of vespertilionine bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Experientia 36 (6): 653-654. doi: 10.1007/ BF01970118 Arslan A, Zima J (2014). Karyotypes of the mammals of Turkey and neighbouring regions: a review. Folia Zoologica 63 (1): 1-62.
Benda P, Horacek I (1998). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the Eastern Mediterranean. Part 1. Review of distribution and taxonomy of bats in Turkey. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae 62: 255-313.
Benda P, Karataş A (2005). On some Mediterranean populations of bats of the Myotis mystacinus morpho-group (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Lynx (Praha) n. s. 36: 9-38.
Bickham JW, Hafner JC (1978). A chromosomal banding study of three species of vespertilionid bats from Yugoslavia. Genetica 48 (1): 1-3. doi: 10.1007/BF00125280 Burgin CJ, Colella JP, Kahn PL, Upham NS (2018). How many species of mammals are there? Journal of Mammalogy 99 (1): 1-14. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyz052 Çoraman E, Furman A, Karataş A, Bilgin R (2013). Phylogeographic analysis of Anatolian bats highlights the importance of the region for preserving the chiropteran mitochondrial genetic diversity in the western Palaearctic. Conservation Genetics 14 (6): 1205-1216. doi: 10.1007/s10592-013-0509-4
Ford CE, Hamerton JL (1956). ‘A colchicine-hypotonic-citrate’ squash sequence for mammalian chromosomes. Stain Technology 31 (6): 247-251. doi: 10.3109/10520295609113814 Harada M, Yosida TH (1978). Karyological study of four Japanese Myotis bats (Chiroptera, Mammalia). Chromosoma 65 (3): 283-291.
Howell WM, Black DA (1980). Controlled silver staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method. Experientia 36 (8): 1014-1015. doi: 10.1007/ bf01953855 Piraccini R (2016). Myotis emarginatus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T14129A22051191. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Reina JM, de Paz O, Pérez-Suarez G, Navlet J (1994). Chromosome studies of six species of the genus Myotis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from Spain. Cytologia 59 (2): 219-223. doi: 10.1508/cytologia.59.219 Sumner AT (1972). A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Experimental Cell Research 75 (1): 304-306. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90558-7