SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Havacılık ve Uzay Teknolojileri Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Hiyerarşik gri ilişkisel analiz yöntemiyle çok kriterli çağrı merkezi yeri seçimi

A multicriteria call center site selection by hierarchy grey relational analysis

SEMRA BİRGÜN
Cengiz GÜNGÖR
Pages
45–52
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Nine cities given as alternatives are evaluated and compared against human resources, economic and regional conditions including fourteen sub-criteria.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Facility location selection is a decision problem that takes into consideration both qualitative and quantitative factors and also is one of the most important strategic decisions affecting organizations in terms of business success.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fundamentally, it comprises evaluating a group of alternative sites on the basis of multiple criteria.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Nine cities given as alternatives are evaluated and compared against human resources, economic and regional conditions including fourteen sub-criteria.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Facility location selection is a decision problem that takes into consideration both qualitative and quantitative factors and also is one of the most important strategic decisions affecting organizations in terms of business success. Fundamentally, it comprises evaluating a group of alternative sites on the basis of multiple criteria. In this context when alternatives and factors are multitudinous, multi-criteria decision making methods are being used for successful decisions. In this paper the decision problem is exemplified by applying on a part of a project for a call center site selection by using one of the multi-criteria decision-making methods, namely hierarchy grey relational analysis, based on application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and grey relational analysis (GRA) methods. The goal of the selection is to determine the most appropriate location among the alternatives. Nine cities given as alternatives are evaluated and compared against human resources, economic and regional conditions including fourteen sub-criteria.

Özet

Tesis kuruluş yeri seçimi nitel ve nicel faktörleri dikkate alan bir karar problemi olmakla beraber aynı zamanda organizasyonun başarısını etkilemesi açısından da en önemli stratejik kararlardan birisidir. Esasında bir grup alternatifi birçok kriter temelinde değerlendirmeyi içermektedir. Bu kapsamda alternatif ve etkenler fazla olduğu zaman başarılı kararlar için çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri kullanılmaktadır. Bu makalede karar problemi, Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) ve Gri İlişkisel Analiz (GİA) yöntemlerini temel alan çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinden Hiyerarşik Gri İlişkisel Analiz yönteminin çağrı merkezi yer seçimi için bir projenin parçası olarak uygulanmasıyla örneklendirilmiştir. Seçimin amacı alternatifler arasından en uygun yeri belirlemektir. Alternatif olarak verilen dokuz şehir ondört alt kriter içeren insan kaynağı, ekonomik ve bölgesel şartlar kapsamında karşılaştırılmış ve değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİRGÜN, S., GÜNGÖR, C. (2014). Hiyerarşik gri ilişkisel analiz yöntemiyle çok kriterli çağrı merkezi yeri seçimi. Havacılık ve Uzay Teknolojileri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 45–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/175544

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. San Cristóbal, J. R., (2011) “Multi-criteria Decision-making in the Selection of a Renewable Energy Project in Spain: The VIKOR Method”, Renewable Energy, 36(2): 498-502
  2. Tzeng, G. H., Teng, M. H., Chen, J. J., Opricovic, S., (2002) “Multicriteria Selection for a Restaurant Location in Taipei”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 21(2): 171-187
  3. Fernandez, I., Ruiz M. C., (2009) “Descriptive Model and Evaluation System to Locate Sustainable Industrial Areas”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(1): 87-100
  4. Badri, M. A., (1999) “Combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Goal Programming for Global Facility Location-Allocation Problem”, Int. J. Production Economics, Vol. 62: 237-248
  5. Deng, J. L., (1989) “Introduction to Grey System”, Journal of Grey System, 1(1), 1-24
  6. Wen, K. L., (2004) “The Grey System Analysis and Its Application in Gas Breakdown and VAR Compensator Finding (invited paper)”, International Journal of Computational Cognition, 2(1): 21–44
  7. Chen, F. L., Chen, Y. C., (2010) “Evaluating the Maintenance Performance of the Semiconductor Factories Based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process and Grey Relational Analysis,” American Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(4): 568-574
  8. Karmakar, S., Mujumdar, P. P., (2006) “Grey Fuzzy Optimization Model for Water Quality Management of a River System”, Advances in Water Resources, 29(7): 1088-1105
  9. Zeng, J., Jiang, Z., Li, T., Yang, D., Kim, Y. H., (2011) “Application of Entropy Weight Technique in Grey Relational Analysis for Scheme Optimization of Sewage Treatment Plant”, Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 199-200: 1722-1728
  10. Zhen-qiang, B., Peng, W., Fang, Y., Cong-wei, Z., Lei, G., (2008) “Grey Relation Degree Analysis for the Facility's Location of Logistics Distribution Network”, International Symposiums on Information Processing, pp. 615-619
  11. Huang, Y. P., Huang, C. C., (1996) “The Integration and Application of Fuzzy and Grey Modeling Methods”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 78(1): 107-119
  12. Chang, T. C., Lin, S. J., (1999) “Grey Relation Analysis of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Industrial Production and Energy Uses in Taiwan”, Journal of Environmental Management, 56(4): 247-257
  13. Sarucan, A., Baysal, M. E., Kahraman, C., Engin, O., (2011) “A Hierarchy Grey Relational Analysis for Selecting the Renewable Electricity Generation Technologies”, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, Vol. 2: 1149-1154
  14. Yang, C. C., Chen, B. S., (2006