SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Genel Tıp Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Torokal ve lumbal vertebraların morfometrik olarak incelenmesi

Işık TUNCER
Pages
115–120
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The anomalies, knowledge of mean values and morphometric measurements variabilities of thorocal and lumbar vertebraes will decrease the mortality and morbidity in spinal surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the morphometric specialities of the thorocal and lumbar vertebraes.Results: In this study, 103 thorocal and 53 lumbar vertebraes were studied in anatomy department .
📊
Key Findings & Data:The mean posterior height of the thorocal and lumbar corpuses respectly as follows 18,96 ± 2,68 mm and 25,33 ± 2,69 mm, anterior height 19,29 ± 2,75 mm and 25,24 ± 2,51 mm, the width of pedicules; 27,17 ± 5,50 mm and 31,84 ± 4,19 mm, the height of pedicul;12,67 ± 2,43 mm and 13,54 mm ±2,08mm, the sagittal diameter corpuses ;15,30 ± 2,54 mm and 15,08 ± 2,12 mm the transvers diameter ; 33,31 ± 5,62 mm and 48,53 ±6,86 the transvers diameter of the foramen vertebrale 20,38 ± 3,10 mm and 23,13 ± 2,50 mm the sagittal diameter of the foramen vertebrale 7,83 ± 4,40 mm and 11,86 ± 5,00 mm.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The anomalies, knowledge of mean values and morphometric measurements variabilities of thorocal and lumbar vertebraes will decrease the mortality and morbidity in spinal surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the morphometric specialities of the thorocal and lumbar vertebraes.Results: In this study, 103 thorocal and 53 lumbar vertebraes were studied in anatomy department . The mean posterior height of the thorocal and lumbar corpuses respectly as follows 18,96 ± 2,68 mm and 25,33 ± 2,69 mm, anterior height 19,29 ± 2,75 mm and 25,24 ± 2,51 mm, the width of pedicules; 27,17 ± 5,50 mm and 31,84 ± 4,19 mm, the height of pedicul;12,67 ± 2,43 mm and 13,54 mm ±2,08mm, the sagittal diameter corpuses ;15,30 ± 2,54 mm and 15,08 ± 2,12 mm the transvers diameter ; 33,31 ± 5,62 mm and 48,53 ±6,86 the transvers diameter of the foramen vertebrale 20,38 ± 3,10 mm and 23,13 ± 2,50 mm the sagittal diameter of the foramen vertebrale 7,83 ± 4,40 mm and 11,86 ± 5,00 mm. Conclusion: The anomalies, knowledge of mean values and morphometric measurements variabilities of thorocal and lumbar vertebraes will decrease the mortality and morbidity in spinal surgery.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamız, lumbal ve torokal vertebraların morfometrik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla düzenlenmiştir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada, Anatomi Anabilim Dalı'nda bulunan 103 torokal ve 53 lumbal vertebra kullanıldı.Bulgular: Yapılan çalışmada, korpusun arka yüksekliği; ortalama (torokallerde 18,96 ± 2,68 mm, lumballerde 25,33 ± 2,69 mm), korpusun ön yüksekliği ortalama (torokallerde 19,29 ± 2,75 mm lumballerde 25,24 ± 2,51 mm), pedikül genişliği; ortalama ( torokallerde 27,17 ± 5,50 mm, lumballerde 31,84 ± 4,19 mm) pedikül yüksekliği; ortalama (torokallerde12,67±2,43mm, lumballerde 13,54 ± 2,08mm), korpusun sagittal çapı ortalama (torokallerde 15,30 ± 2,54 mm, lumballerde 15,08 ± 2,12 mm), korpusun transvers çapı ortalama (torokallerde 33,31 ± 5,62 mm, lumballerde 48,53 ± 6,86 mm ) foramen vertebrale transvers çapı ortalama (torokallerde 20,38 ± 3,10 mm, lumballerde 23,13 ± 2,50 mm) foramen vertebralenin sagittal çapı ortalama ( torokallerde 7,83 ±4,40mm, lumballerde 11,86 ± 5,00 mm) olarak tespit edilmiştir.Sonuç: Omurgaya yönelik cerrahi girişimlerde anomalilerin, morfometrik ölçümlerdeki değişkenliklerin ve ortalama değerlerinin bilinmesi mortalite ve morbiditeyi azaltacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNCER, I. (2017). Torokal ve lumbal vertebraların morfometrik olarak incelenmesi. Genel Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 115–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/173404

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. WHO. Preamble the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 1946
  2. Vuori IM, Lavie CJ, Blair SN. Physical Activity Promotion in thehealthcaresystem. Mayo Clin Proc 2013;88:1446-61
  3. Hambrecht R, Adams V, Erbs S, et al. Regular physical activity improves endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease by increasing phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circulation 2003;107:3152-8
  4. Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Stringer W, Whipp BJ. Principles of Exercise Testing and Interpretation: Including PathophysiologyandClinical Applications. 5th ed. Lippincott Williams &Wilkins, New York, NY, USA; 2012
  5. Wiecek M, Maciejczyk M, Szymura J, Szygula Z. Changes inoxidative stressand acid-base balance in men and women following maximal-intensity physical exercise. Physiol Res 2015;64:93-102
  6. Berzosa C, Cebrián I, Fuentes-Broto LJ, et al. Acute exercise increases Plasma total antioxidant status and antioxidant enzyme activities in untrained men. Biomed Biotechnol 2011;2011:540458
  7. Teixeira VH, Valente HF, Casal SI, Marques FP, Moreira PA. Blood antioxidant and oxidative stress biomarkers acuteresponses to a 1000-m kayak sprint in elite male kayakers. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2013;53:71-9
  8. Zalavras A, Fatouros IG, Deli CK, et al. Age related responses in circulating markers of redox status in healthy adolescents and adults during the course of a training macrocycle. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2015;2015:283921
  9. Benot S, Molinero P, Soutto M, Goberna R, Guerrero JM. Circadian Variations in therat serum total antioxidant status: correlation with melatonin levels. J Pineal Res 1998;25:1-4
  10. Vollaard NB, Shearman JP, Cooper CE. Exercise-induced oxidative stress: myths, realities and physiological relevance. Sports Med 2005;12:1045-62
  11. Reilly T, Ekblom B. The Use of recovery methods post-exercise. J Sports Sci 2005;6:61927
  12. Cazzola R, Russo-Volpe S, Cervato G, Cestaro B. Biochemical assessments of oxidative stress, erythrocyte membrane fluidity and antioxidant status in professional soccer playersand sedentary controls. Eur J ClinInvest 2003;10:924-30
  13. Brites FD, Evelson PA, Christiansen MG, et al. Soccer players under regular training Show oxidative stress but an improved plasma antioxidant status. ClinSci (Lond) 1999;4:381-5
  14. Banfi G, Malavazos A, Iorio E, et al. Plasma Oxidative StressBiomarkers, nitricoxideand heat shock protein 70 in trained