Journals / İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Relationships Between Personality Structures, Psychopathological Characteristics and Problem Areas

Çiftlerde, Kişilik Yapıları ve Psikopatolojik Özellikler ile Yardım Aldıkları Problem Alanları Arasındaki İlişkiler

Pages
3211–3229
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, the most common problems for both men and women are anger problem and mother-in-law problem.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Marriage and relationship satisfaction is one of the factors that affect a person’s stress level, emotional state and welfare.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected from 81 couples who applied to the clinic for psychological help.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, the most common problems for both men and women are anger problem and mother-in-law problem.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kişilik Yapıları · Psikopatoloji · MMPI

Abstract

Marriage and relationship satisfaction is one of the factors that affect a person’s stress level, emotional state and welfare. For this reason, when couples have problems, they may apply to couple therapy for different reasons and get help. Personality structures are an important variable that enables predicting relational problems. They are generally known to be an important factor in establishing and maintaining close relationships. Also, psychopathological features are related to the functioning of the relations. Therefore, in this study, the relationships between the character structure and psychopathological characteristics of the couples and the problem areas they receive help were investigated. Data were collected from 81 couples who applied to the clinic for psychological help. The problem areas applied by the participants were determined by 14 problem areas in the interview form. Psychopathological characteristics and personality structures were evaluated using Minnesota Multidimensional Personality Inventory (MMPI). According to the results, the most common problems for both men and women are anger problem and mother-in-law problem. The psychopathological characteristics and personality structures of the participants were found to be related to the problems they were receiving help for.

Özet

Evlilik ve ilişki doyumu, kişinin stresli olma halini, duygu durumunu ve refah seviyesini etkileyen unsurlardan biridir. Bu sebeple, birçok çift sorun yaşadıklarında farklı sebeplerle çift terapisine başvurmakta ve yardım alabilmektedir. İlişkisel problemleri öngörmeyi sağlayan bir unsur kişilik yapılarıdır. Kişilik özellikleri ile ilgili farklılıkların genellikle yakın bir ilişki kurma ve sürdürmede önemli bir faktör olduğu bilinmektedir. Ayrıca, psikopatolojik özellikler de ilişkilerin işleyişi ile bağlantılıdır. Bu çalışmada, çiftlerin karakter yapıları ve psikopatolojik özellikleri ile yardım aldıkları problemler arasındaki ilişkiler araştırılmıştır. Veriler, psikolojik yardım almak üzere kliniğe başvuru yapan 81 çiftten toplanmıştır. Katılımcıların başvurdukları problem alanları, görüşme formunda yer alan 14 problem alanı ile belirlenmiştir. Psikopatolojik özellikleri ve kişilik yapıları ise Minnesota Çok Yönlü Kişilik Envanteri (MMPI) kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçlar, hem erkekler hem kadınlar için en sık rastlanan problemlerin öfke problemi ve kayın valide problemi olduğunu göstermektedir. Katılımcıların psikopatolojik özelliklerinin ve kişilik yapılarının ise yardım aldıkları problemlerle ilişkili olduğu bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

SET, Z. (2019). Relationships Between Personality Structures, Psychopathological Characteristics and Problem Areas. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 3211–3229. https://ajindex.com/articles/173309

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Amani, R., Majzoobi, M. R., & Hadian Hamedani, K. (2019). Comparing the Big-Five Personality Traits of Iranian Women in the Midst of Divorce and Women in the Normal State of Marriage, as Predictors of Divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 60(1), 1-11.
  2. Amato, P. R., & Rogers, S. J. (1997). A longitudinal study of marital problems and subsequent divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 612-624.
  3. Arnold, P. D. (1972). MARRIAGE COUNSELEE MMPI PROFILE CHARACTERISTICS WITH OBJECTIVE SIGNS THATDISCRIMINATE THEM FROM MARRIED COUPLES IN GENERAL. Arrindell, W. A., & Emmelkamp, P. M. (1986). Marital adjustment, intimacy and needs in female agoraphobics and their partners: A controlled study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 149(5), 592-602.
  4. Bauserman, S. A. K., Arias, I., & Craighead, W. E. (1995). Marital attributions in spouses of depressed patients. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 17(3), 231-249.
  5. Beach, S. R., Sandeen, E., & O'Leary, K. D. (1990). Depression in marriage: A model for etiology and treatment. Guilford Press.
  6. Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1988). Individual difference variables in close relationships: A contextual model of marriage as an integrative framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 713. Burman, B., & Margolin, G. (1992). Analysis of the association between marital relationships and health problems: an interactional perspective. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), 39. Ceyhun, B., & Oral, N. (2003). Minnesota Çok Yönlü Kişilik Envanteri Değerlendirme Kitabı,(2. baskı). Çizgi Tıp Yayınevi,
  7. Ankara.
  8. Chambless, D. L., Fauerbach, J. A., Floyd, F. J., Wilson, K. A., Remen, A. L., & Renneberg, B. (2002). Marital interaction of agoraphobic women: A controlled, behavioral observation study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(3), 502. Davis, M. H., & Oathout, H. A. (1992). The effect of dispositional empathy on romantic relationship behaviors: Heterosocial anxiety as a moderating influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 76-83.
  9. Du Fort, G. G., Kovess, V., & Boivin, J. F. (1994). Spouse similarity for psychological distress and well-being: A population study. Psychological medicine, 24(2), 431-447.
  10. Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of personality and