Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2019 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 3

Monitoring and Transfusion Nursing Practices with Electronic Record in Blood Transfusion Process Management

Kan Transfüzyon Süreci Yönetiminde Elektronik Kayıt ile Takip ve Transfüzyon Hemşireliği Uygulaması

Pages
310–318
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Electronic recording of all transfusion processes in hospitals, in which a large number of blood transfusions are performed, can increase the safety of transfusion and transfusion feedback

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: We aimed to evaluate the effects of the application of the electronic blood tracking system and transfusion nursing on the transfusion process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Blood transfusion tracking forms were included in the hospital information Management System (HIMS) in July 2015 and the users were able to electronically record all data, including order, approval, transfusion tracking, and destruction and reaction notification.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Electronic recording of all transfusion processes in hospitals, in which a large number of blood transfusions are performed, can increase the safety of transfusion and transfusion feedback
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to evaluate the effects of the application of the electronic blood tracking system and transfusion nursing on the transfusion process. Methods: Blood transfusion tracking forms were included in the hospital information Management System (HIMS) in July 2015 and the users were able to electronically record all data, including order, approval, transfusion tracking, and destruction and reaction notification. The transfusion nurse in the blood center followed the processes and gave feedback. Nurses were periodically trained on transfusion, unintended events and reaction reporting. The effects of this application were evaluated based on 36 months of pooled data. Results: With the electronic registration application, the location of the blood products could be tracked via the HIMS. During this 36-month period, 401 in-house and in-clinic trainings were conducted in our hospital; there was a statistically significant increase in the feedback rates in 2016 (p=0.006), and this increase continued in 2017 (p=0.049); the increase in the first period was more prominent (p=0.010). It was observed that the number of inappropriate cases decreased. There was a decrease blood product transfer time in 2017 compared to 2016 (p=0.036). Results: Electronic recording of all transfusion processes in hospitals, in which a large number of blood transfusions are performed, can increase the safety of transfusion and transfusion feedback

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, kan ürünlerinin elektronik kayıt ile takibi ve transfüzyon hemşireliği uygulamasının transfüzyon süreçlerine etkilerini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Yöntemler: Kan transfüzyon takip formları, kullanılmakta olan Hastane Bilgi Yönetim Sistemine (HBYS) Temmuz 2015 tarihinde eklenerek, kullanıcıların order, kabul, onay, transfüzyon takibi, imha ve reaksiyon bildirimi gibi tüm işlemleri sistem üzerinden elektronik olarak kaydetmesi sağlandı. Kan merkezinde görevli transfüzyon hemşiresi süreçleri takip ederek geri bildirimlerde bulundu. İşleyiş, istenmeyen olay ve reaksiyon bildirimi konusunda transfüzyon yapan hemşireler aralıklı olarak eğitildi. Bu uygulamanın etkileri 36 aylık veriler üzerinden değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Elektronik kayıt uygulaması ile kan ürünlerinin yeri ve durumu, servis bazlı olarak HBYS üzerinden takip edilebilmiştir. Bu 36 aylık süre içinde hastanemizde 401 işbaşı ve klinik içi eğitim yapılmış; uygulama sonrası 2016 yılında geri bildirim oranlarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir artış olduğu (p=0,006), 2017 yılında da bu artışın devam ettiği (p=0,049); ilk dönemdeki artışın ise daha belirgin olduğu (p=0,010) saptanmıştır. Bu uygulamayla uygunsuz muhafaza sayısının azaldığı gözlenmiştir. Kan ve kan ürünü transfer sürelerinde; 2017 yılında, 2016 yılına kıyasla azalma olduğu (p=0,036) görülmüştür. Sonuç: Fazla sayıda transfüzyon yapılan hastanelerde transfüzyon süreçlerinin tamamının elektronik kayıt altına alınması, transfüzyon geri bildirimlerinin ve transfüzyon güvenliğinin artırılmasına katkı sağlayabilir

🔖

Cite This Article

KARABELA, Ş. N., ALTUNGAYULAR, S., TAŞPOLAT, İ., BAYDİLİ, K. N., YAŞAR, K. K. (2019). Monitoring and Transfusion Nursing Practices with Electronic Record in Blood Transfusion Process Management. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 3, 310–318. https://ajindex.com/articles/172795

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Kashani FR, Torki MK. Haemovigilance System Quality After Establishment of Patient’s Safety Standards: Quality of Patient Identification, Blood Typing, and Transport and Conservation of Blood and Blood Components. Middle East Journal of Family Medicine 2018;7:260-7
  2. World Health Organization- Blood transfusion safety-Safe and rational clinical use of blood 2018 [updated 28.11.2018. Available from: http://www.who.int/bloodsafety/clinical_ use/en/ 3. Ulusal Kan ve Kan Ürünleri Rehberi. Ankara: The Ministry of Health of Turkey; 2011. p. 1-303
  3. Azık FM, Mehmet F, Bozkaya İO. Hemolitik Transfzyon Reaksiyonları. Journal of Current Pediatrics/Guncel Pediatri 2011;9.3
  4. Smith FC, Donaldson J, Pirie L. Pre-registration adult nurses’ knowledge of safe transfusion practice: Results of a 12 month follow-up study. Nurse Educ Pract 2010;10:101-7
  5. Öztürk ŞMB. Akut Hemolitik Transfüzyon Reaksiyonları. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Hematology Special Topics 2016;9:129-34
  6. Hainsworth T. Guidance for preventing errors in administering blood transfusions. Nurs Times 2004;100:30-1
  7. Çavuşoğlu H, Güneş NB, Pars H. Kan Ürünleri ve Güvenli Kan Transfüzyonu. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Nurs Sci 2015;7:49- 57
  8. Shulman IA, Saxena S, Ramer L. Assessing blood administering practices. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 1999;123:595-8
  9. Gao L, Sha Y, Yuan K, et al. Allergic transfusion reaction caused by the shrimp allergen of donor blood: A case report. Trasci 2014;50:68-70
  10. Aslani Y, Etemadyfar S, Noryan K. Nurses’ knowledge of blood transfusion in medical training centers of Shahrekord University of Medical Science in 2004. Iranian J Nurs Midwifery Res 2010;15:141-4
  11. Bolton-Maggs PHB. SHOT conference report 2016: serious hazards of transfusion - human factors continue to cause most transfusion-related incidents. Transfus Med 2016;26:401-5
  12. Engelbrecht S, Wood EM, Cole-Sinclair MF. Clinical transfusion practice update: haemovigilance, complications, patient blood management and national standards. Med J Aust 2013;199:397-401
  13. Bolton-Maggs PHB, Cohen H. Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) haemovigilance and progress is improving transfusion safety. Br J Haematol 2013;163:303-14
  14. Organization WH. Blood transfusion safety. The clinical use of blood handbook. https://www.who.int/bloodsafety/clinical_ use/en/Handbook_EN.pdf (Last accesed: 20 August 2019
  15. Bryan S. Hemolytic transfusion reaction: safeguards for practice. J Peria