SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Humanities and Tourism Research / 2015 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

-

Psikolojik Sözleşme İhlal Algısının Devlet ve Vakıf Üniversitelerinde Görev Yapan Akademisyenler Kapsamında Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Ozan BÜYÜKYILMAZ
Ahmet ÇAKMAK
Pages
48–71
Publication Date
2015-06-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show demographic variables such as gender, marital status, age, position, university and tenure have a differentiating effect on relational and transactional aspects of the psychological contract

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine whether the degree of psychological contract breach of the academic staff working in state and foundation universities in Turkey differentiate in terms of demographic variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data for the sample was collected from 570 academicians from a variety of universities in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show demographic variables such as gender, marital status, age, position, university and tenure have a differentiating effect on relational and transactional aspects of the psychological contract
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Psikolojik Sözleşme · Psikolojik Sözleşme İhlali · Akademik Personel

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the degree of psychological contract breach of the academic staff working in state and foundation universities in Turkey differentiate in terms of demographic variables. Data for the sample was collected from 570 academicians from a variety of universities in Turkey. T-test and ANOVA analyses were conducted to test the hypotheses. The results show demographic variables such as gender, marital status, age, position, university and tenure have a differentiating effect on relational and transactional aspects of the psychological contract

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, devlet ve vakıf üniversitelerinde görev yapan akademik personel tarafından algılanan psikolojik sözleşme ihlal derecesinde demografik değişkenler açısında bir farklılık olup olmadığını tespit edebilmektir. Bu amaç kapsamında, Türkiye'de yer alan devlet ve vakıf üniversitelerinde görev yapan 570 akademik personelden anket yöntemi kullanılarak veriler elde edilmiştir. Hipotezleri test etmek amacıyla t-testi ve ANOVA analizinden yararlanılmıştır.Çalışmanın sonucunda, psikolojik sözleşmenin ilişkisel ve işlemsel unsurlarında cinsiyet, medenidurum, yaş, unvan, üniversite ve üniversitede çalışma süresi değişkenlerinin farklılaştırıcı etkisinin bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜKYILMAZ, O., ÇAKMAK, A. (2015). -. Journal of Humanities and Tourism Research, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 48–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/172553

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Agarwal, U. A. ve Bhargava, S. (2013). Effects of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Outcomes: Moderating Role of Tenure and Educational Levels, The Journal for Decision Makers, 38 (1), 13-25.
  2. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. ve Yıldırım, E. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri: SPSS Uygulamalı. İstanbul: 4. Baskı,
  3. Avcı Ofset. Anderson, N. ve Schalk, R (1998). The Psychological Contract in Retrospect and Prospect, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19 (Special Issue), 637-647.
  4. Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding Organizational Behavior. Homewood: Dorsey Press.
  5. Aydın, İ., Memduhoğlu, H. B., Oğuz, E. ve Güngör, S. (2008). Academic and Non-Academic Staff’s Psychological Contract in Turkey, Higher Education Quarterly, 62 (3), 252-272.
  6. Bal, M. (2009). Age and Psychological Contract Breach in Relation to Work Outcomes (Unpublished Dissertation), Amsterdam: VU University. Bal, P. M., De Lange, A. H., Jansen, P. G. W. ve Van Der Velde, M. E. G. (2008). Psychological Contract Breach and Job Attitudes: A Meta-Analysis of Age as a Moderator, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72 (1), 143-158.
  7. Bal, P. M., De Lange, A. H., Jansen, P. G. W. ve Van Der Velde, M. E. G. (2013). A Longitudinal Study of Age-Related Differences in Reactions to Psychological Contract Breach, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 62 (1), 157-181.
  8. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, New York: The Guilford Press.
  9. Cassar, V. ve Briner, R. B. (2011). The Relationship between Psychological Contract Breach and Organizational Commitment: Exchange Imbalance as a Moderator of the Mediating Role of Violation, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78 (2), 283-289.
  10. Chin, P-L. ve Hung, M-L. (2013). Psychological Contract Breach And Turnover Intention: The Moderating Roles Of Adversity Quotient And Gender, Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 41 (5), 843-860.
  11. Conway, N. ve Coyle-Shapiro, J. A-M. (2012). The Reciprocal Relationship between Psychological Contract Fulfilment and Employee Performance and the Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support and Tenure, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85 (2), 1-23.
  12. Conway, N. ve Briner, R. B. (2002). A Daily Diary Study of Affective Responses to Psychological Contract Breach and Exceeded Promises, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23 (3), 287- 302. Conway, N. ve Briner, R. B. (2005). Understanding Psychological Contracts at Work: A Critical Evaluat