SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 35

THE AMERICAN INTERVENTION IN THE 1964 CYPRUS CRISIS AND THE GREEK POLITICAL REACTION (FEBRUARY-AUGUST 1964)

AMERIKA’NIN 1964 KIBRIS KRIZI’NE MÜDAHALESI VE YUNANISTAN’IN TEPKISI (ŞUBAT-AĞUSTOS 1964)

Gürhan YELLİCE
Pages
367–401
Publication Date
2018-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This will help reveal why the Cyprus issue remained unresolved in 1964, results ofwhich affected 1967 and 1974 Crises and still affects the current deadlock.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This work is about the American intervention in the 1964 Cyprus Crisis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In particular,the study concentrates on the Greek political reaction to the US mediation efforts duringthe crisis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This will help reveal why the Cyprus issue remained unresolved in 1964, results ofwhich affected 1967 and 1974 Crises and still affects the current deadlock.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:1964 Kıbrıs Krizi · Amerikan müdahalesi · Yunanistan

Abstract

This work is about the American intervention in the 1964 Cyprus Crisis. In particular,the study concentrates on the Greek political reaction to the US mediation efforts duringthe crisis. The process that brought about the first US involvement in the crisis started inNovember 1963, when Makarios sought to change the constitution in order to centralize thegovernment. This move soon led a civil war on the island and after the war, the guarantorpowers got involved. Believing Makarios’ “independent” actions on the island were a threatto “peace” in the Mediterranean. The primary objective of the US was to avoid a war betweenTurkey and Greece and to secure the Natofication of the island. Both Turkey and Greeceaccepted the elimination of Makarios but disagreed on how to achieve it: “Enosis or Enosiswith compensation to Turkey”. Turkey wanted the second option while Greece insisted on thefirst. Makarios, on the other hand, achieved the internationalization of the crisis by demandinghelp from Soviets. Under Cold War conditions, the Johnson administration, believing thatthe second option was the best solution for the interests of all the parties, tried very hard tofind the silver lining between the parties however, they failed to convince the Papandreougovernment in Greece. By examining this historical process, it is proposed to analyze theparameters that led Greece to not accept the US proposals to come to an agreement withTurkey. This will help reveal why the Cyprus issue remained unresolved in 1964, results ofwhich affected 1967 and 1974 Crises and still affects the current deadlock.

Özet

1964 Kıbrıs Krizi’ne Amerika’nın müdahalesini konu edinen bu çalışma, bu süreçte

🔖

Cite This Article

YELLİCE, G. (2018). THE AMERICAN INTERVENTION IN THE 1964 CYPRUS CRISIS AND THE GREEK POLITICAL REACTION (FEBRUARY-AUGUST 1964). Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 35, 367–401. https://ajindex.com/articles/17056

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. SOURCES I. Archives TNA: The National Archives, London Foreign and Commonwealth Office Papers (FCO) Foreign Office Papers (FO 371) Cabinet Papers (CAB) War Office Papers (WO) FRUS: Foreign Relations of the Unites States, Washington KAK: Kratiko Arheiou Kyprou, Nicosia II. Newspapers Ta Nea, Eleftheria, Makedonia, To Vima, Avgi Milliyet, The Times, The New York Times III. Book And Memoirs AKKURT, Aydın, Türk Mukavemet Teşkilâtı 1957-1958
  2. Mücadelesi, Bayrak Matbaacılık İstanbul, 1999.
  3. ALASTOS, Doros,, Cyprus Guerrilla: Grivas, Makarios and the British, William Heinemann Ltd, London, 1960.
  4. ALEKSANDRAKİ, Menelaos, Theodoropoulos Viron, Lagakos, Evastathios, To Kipriako 1950-1974:
  5. Mia Endoskopisi, B Ekdosi, Ekdosi Elliniki Evroekdotiki, Athina, 1987.
  6. ARMAOĞLU, Fahir, 20. Yüzyıl Siyasi Tarihi, Cilt I, İşbankası Kültür Yayınları, 1993.
  7. ATTALIDES, Michael, Cyprus: Nationalism and International Politics, Q Press, Edinburg, 1978.
  8. ANGELOS S. Vlahos, Mia Fora ki Ena Kairo Enas Diplomatis, Tomos D, Vivliopolion tis Esteias, Athina, 1986.
  9. AVEROFF-Tossizza, Lost Opportunities: The Cyprus Question, 1950-1963,
  10. Aristide D. Caratzas Publishing, New York, 1986.
  11. BAHCHELI, Tozun, Greek-Turkish Relations Since 1955, Boulder; Westview Press, 1990.
  12. BALL, George, The Past Has another Pattern, Norton, New York, 1982
  13. BARUTÇU, Ecmel, Hariciye Koridoru, 21. Yüzyıl Yayınları, Ankara, 1999.
  14. BITOU, Yannis, Apo tin Prosini Grammi stous dio Attiles, B. Ekdosi, Athina, 1998.
  15. BİTSİOS S. Dimitri, Cyprus: The Vulnerable Republic, Institute for Balkan Studies, Thessaloniki, 1975.
  16. BRINKLEY, Douglas, Dean Acheson: The Cold War Years, 1953-1971,
  17. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1991.
  18. CLOSE, David, Ellada 1945-2004,
  19. Met. Georgios Mertikas, Ekdoseis Thyrephen, Thessaloniki, 2004.
  20. CLERİDİS, Glafkos, My Depositon, Vol. I, Alithia, Nicosia, 1989.
  21. CRAWSHAW, Nancy, Cyprus Revolt: An Account of the Struggle for Union with Greece, George Allen&Unwin, London, 1978.
  22. DODD, Clement, The Cyprus Imbroglio, Oethen Press, Cambridge 1988.
  23. EHRLICH, Thomas, Cyprus: 1958- 1967, London; Oxford University Press, 1974.
  24. GAROUFALIAS E. Petros, Ellas kai Kypros, Tragika Sfalmata-Efkeries pou Hatikan, Ekdoseis Bergadi, Athina, 1982.
  25. HASGÜLER, Mehmet, Kıbrıs’ta Enosis ve Taksim’in İflası, Öteki Yayınevi, Ankara 1998.
  26. HATZIVASSILIOU, Evanthis, Greece and the cold war: Frontline state, 1952–67, London: Routledge, 2007.
  27. HART T. Parker, Two NATO Allies at the Threshold of war: Cyprus, A Firsthand account of crisis mana