Journals / Kebikeç İnsan Bilimleri İçin Kaynak Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 48

Political Construction of Crimes Against Humanity: Nuremberg and Its Legacy

İnsanlık Suçunun Siyaseten İnşası: Nürnberg ve Mirası

Pages
7–40
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although the Nuremberg Trials are considered as an important contribution to international law making, their practices against customary international law and reflections and the nature of international relations are also worthy of scholarly studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nuremberg Trials have been considered by the international society within the framework of government officials being tried according to the rules of international law for the crimes committed against humanity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, serious objections had been raised almost immediately after the establishment of the International Court.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although the Nuremberg Trials are considered as an important contribution to international law making, their practices against customary international law and reflections and the nature of international relations are also worthy of scholarly studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Nuremberg Trials have been considered by the international society within the framework of government officials being tried according to the rules of international law for the crimes committed against humanity. However, serious objections had been raised almost immediately after the establishment of the International Court. These objections focused on two broad areas: political considerations and problems that could arise from the practice of international law making. Although the Nuremberg Trials are considered as an important contribution to international law making, their practices against customary international law and reflections and the nature of international relations are also worthy of scholarly studies.

Özet

Nürnberg Mahkemeleri, uluslararası toplum tarafından devlet yetkililerinin insanlığa karşı işlenmiş suçlardan uluslararası hukukun gereği olarak yargılanması bağlamında değerlendirilmektedir. Halbuki mahkemelerin oluşum aşamasından itibaren her yönde önemli çekinceler gündeme gelmiştir. Bunlar, siyasi çekinceler ve hukuk kurallarının inşası bağlamında yaratabileceği sorunlar üzerine yoğunlaşmıştır. Uluslararası hukuk kurallarının inşa sürecine önemli katkısının olmasının yanında geleneksel hukuk teamüllerine aykırı uygulamalarıyla da uluslararası ilişkilerin doğası bağlamında önemli bir konumda değerlendirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KINLI, O., KUTBAY, E. Y. (2019). Political Construction of Crimes Against Humanity: Nuremberg and Its Legacy. Kebikeç İnsan Bilimleri İçin Kaynak Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 48, 7–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/169425

References (2)

  1. 1929 t. ve 1111 sayılı Resmi Gazete. ID. Tertip Düstur, C. 10, 322. “Charter of the International Military Tribunal”, August 8, 1945, http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/Nüremberg/NürembergIndictments.ht ml (Erişim Tarihi: 03.10.2019). “Commission on the Responsibility of the Authors of the War and on Enforcement of Penalties,” The American Journal of International Law, 14 (Jan. - Apr. 1920), 95-154. “Draft Code of Offences Against the Peace and Security of Mankind, Report by J. Spiropoulos, Special Rapporteur”. UN Doc. A/CN.4/25, Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission, C. 2. 1950. “Formulation of Nurnberg principles, Report by J. Spiropoulos, Special Rapporteur”. UN Doc. A/CN.4/22, Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission, C. 2. 1950. “International Military Tribunal (Nüremberg), Judgment and Sentences”, American Journal of International Law, C. 41. 1947. Journal of the United Nations, no. 28 supp. A - A/P. V/55 3. “Nüremberg Code”, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/nurecode.asp (Erişim Tarihi: 03.10.2019). “Peace Treaty of Versailles, Articles 227-230, Penalties”, http://net.lib.byu.edu/~rdh7/wwi/versa/versa6.html (Erişim Tarihi: 03.10.2019). “Report on the Question of International Criminal Jurisdiction by Emil Sandström, Special Rapporteur”, UN Doc. A/CN.4/20, Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission, C. 2. 1950. “Report on the Question of International Criminal Jurisdiction by Ricardo J. Alfaro, Special Rapporteur”, UN Doc. A/CN.4/15 and Corr.1, Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission, C. 2. 1950. Revue Héllenique de Droit International, Sene 3, No., 4. Nisan - Aralık 1950. “Statement by Justice Jackson on War Trials Agreement”, August 12 1945, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imt_jack02.asp (Erişim Tarihi: 03.10.2019).
  2. Taylor, Telford. Final Report to the Secretary of the Army on Nuernberg War Crimes Trials under Control Council Law. USA: United States Government Print Office, 15 August 1949. “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, France, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Agreement fort he Prosecution and Punishment of the Major War Criminals of the European Axis, Signed at London, on 8 August 1945 (Nüremberg Charter)”, United Nations Treaty Series, Treaties and International Agreements Registered or Filed and Recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations, Vol. 82. 1951. “United Nations War Crimes Commissi