Journals / Kebikeç İnsan Bilimleri İçin Kaynak Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 47

An Ottoman Intellectual at the Centre of Science, Theology and Politics: Patriarch of Jerusalem Chrysathos Notaras

Bilim, İlahiyat ve Siyasetin Merkezinde Bir Osmanlı Münevveri: Kudüs Patriği Chrysanthos Notaras

Pages
31–56
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The idea that constitutes the backbone of this article is that individuals such as Chrysanthos can only be understood on realistic terms when we take into account the broader dynamics of the Ottoman world, of which they were increasingly becoming a more important part.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Patriarch of Jerusalem between 1707 and 1730, Chrysanthos Notaras is an extremely important figure both for his activities in the field of science and for Orthodox theology and patriarchal politics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One of the points in which he differs from his Orthodox contemporaries is that he benefitted from the scientific, in particular Arabic, studies produced in the Ottoman word on the one hand, and closely pursued the Scientific Revolution continuing in Europe on the other.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The idea that constitutes the backbone of this article is that individuals such as Chrysanthos can only be understood on realistic terms when we take into account the broader dynamics of the Ottoman world, of which they were increasingly becoming a more important part.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Patriarch of Jerusalem between 1707 and 1730, Chrysanthos Notaras is an extremely important figure both for his activities in the field of science and for Orthodox theology and patriarchal politics. One of the points in which he differs from his Orthodox contemporaries is that he benefitted from the scientific, in particular Arabic, studies produced in the Ottoman word on the one hand, and closely pursued the Scientific Revolution continuing in Europe on the other. Having established a large and variegated network of relations, Chrysanthos also managed to realize the unaccomplished scientific projects of the preceding Orthodox scholars by reconciling his scientific vision with theology and ecclesiastical politics. The idea that constitutes the backbone of this article is that individuals such as Chrysanthos can only be understood on realistic terms when we take into account the broader dynamics of the Ottoman world, of which they were increasingly becoming a more important part.

Özet

1707 ve 1730 yılları arasında Kudüs patrikliği yapmış olan Chrysanthos Notaras, hem bilim alanındaki faaliyetleri hem de Ortodoks ilahiyatı ve patrikhane siyaseti açısından son derece önemli bir şahıstır. Chrysanthos’u Ortodoks çağdaşlarından ayıran noktalardan biri, bir yandan Osmanlı dünyasındaki, özellikle Arapça yazılmış bilimsel çalışmalardan faydalanırken, bir yandan da Avrupa’da devam etmekte olan Bilim Devrimini yakından takip etmesidir. Geniş ve çeşitli bir ilişkiler ağı kurmuş olan Chrysanthos aynı zamanda bilimsel vizyonu ile ilahiyat ve kilise siyasetini uzlaştırarak kendisinden önce gelen Ortodoks münevverlerinin başarısızlıkla sonuçlanmış bilimsel projelerini de Ortodoks Kilisesi adına gerçekleştirebilmiştir. Bu makalenin ana eksenini, Chrysanthos gibi şahısların ancak, artan bir şekilde önemli bir parçası oldukları Osmanlı dünyasının daha geniş dinamikleri göz önünde tutulduğunda gerçekçi bir biçimde anlaşılacağı fikri oluşturmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOLAK, H. (2019). An Ottoman Intellectual at the Centre of Science, Theology and Politics: Patriarch of Jerusalem Chrysathos Notaras. Kebikeç İnsan Bilimleri İçin Kaynak Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 47, 31–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/169419

References (15)

  1. Kâmil Kepeci Tasnifi BOA.KK.d.2542/0. BOA.KK.d.2542/1. BOA.KK.d.2542/3. Nuruosmaniye 2061.
  2. Golvers, Noël ve Efthymios Nicolaidis, ed. Ferdinand Verbiest and Jesuit science in 17th century China: an annotated edition and translation of the Constantinople manuscript (1676). Atina ve Leuven: Institute for Neohellenic Research, National Hellenic Research Foundation / Ferdinand Verbiest Institute, 2009.
  3. Hurmuzaki, Eudoxiu de, ed. Documente Privitoare La Istoria Românilor. Bucharest: Romanian Academy, 1917.
  4. Karmiris, Ioannis, ed. Ta Dogmatika kai Symvolika Mnimeia tis Orthodoxou Katholikis Ekklisias. Atina: 1953.
  5. Notaras, Chrysanthos. Eisagogi eis Ta Geografika kai Sfairika, Paris: 1716. Notaras, Chrysanthos. Syntagmation peri ton offikion, klirikaton, kai archontikion tis tou Christou agias ekklisias meta ton egcheiridion ton peri ton epta mystirion Gavriil Filadelfias kai Iov Amartolou syn omilia tini thespesia Gennadiou patriarchou Konstantinoupoleos, Venedik: 1778. Papadopoulos-Kerameus, Athanasios, ed. Analekta Ierosolymitikes Stachyologias, i syllogi anekdodon kai spanion ellinikon syggrafon peri ton kata ein eoan orthodoxon ekklision kai malista tis ton Palaistinon, Brüksel: 1963.
  6. Adıvar, A. Adnan. Osmanlı Türklerinde İlim. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 1970.
  7. Arnakis, G. Georgiades. “Gregory Palamas among The Turks and Documents of His Captivity as Historical Sources”. Speculum 26/1 (1951): 104-118.
  8. Arvanitakis, G.L. “Notes astronomiques”. Le Messager d’Athènes 5217 (1939).
  9. Aujac, Germaine. “Chrysanthos Notaras et les systèmes du monde”. Pallas 59 (2002): 75-88.
  10. Aydüz, Salim. “Lale Devrinde Yapılan İlmi Faaliyetler”. Divan: Disiplinlerarası Çalışmalar Dergisi 3 (1997): 143-170.
  11. Bayraktar Tellan, Elif. “Bir Osmanlı Müverrihi: Athanasios Komnenos Hypsilantis”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 35/2 (2018): 175-188.
  12. Buxhoeveden, Daniel, ve Gayle Woloshak, ed. Science and the Eastern Orthodox Church. Farnham: Ashgate, 2011.
  13. Camariano-Cioran, Ariadna. Les academies princières de Bucarest et de Jassy et leurs professeurs. Selanik, Institute for Balkan Studies, 1962.
  14. Cicanci, Olga. “Représentants de la diaspora grecque dans la vie culturelle de l’espace roumain (fin XVIe-début XIXe siècle)”. Relations Gréco-Roumaines: Interculturalité et identité nationale, ed. Paschalis M. Kitrolimidès ve Anna Tabaki, 237-251. Atina: Institut de Recherches Néohelléniques, 2004,
  15. Çolak, Hasan ve Elif Bayraktar-Tellan. The Orthodox Church as an Ottoman Institution: A S