Journals / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2019 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

The Inquiry-based Teaching Instruction (IbTI) in Indonesian Secondary Education: What Makes Science Teachers Successful Enact the Curriculum?

Pages
18–33
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that most of the participants did not use IbTI in their science classrooms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The inquiry-based teaching instruction (IbTI) has been practiced internationally to improve student competency in science.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The implementation of this strategy has been recommended by the science curriculum in Indonesia since 2003.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that most of the participants did not use IbTI in their science classrooms.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The inquiry-based teaching instruction (IbTI) has been practiced internationally to improve student competency in science. The implementation of this strategy has been recommended by the science curriculum in Indonesia since 2003. However, it is not still implemented successfully in schools. The implementation is likely unsuccessful to achieve its goals and this has been demonstrated by the results of an international assessment program called PISA in which the ranks of Indonesia have not increased since 2003. This study; thus, focused on this issue by assessing the implementation of IbTI in secondary schools in Jambi City, Indonesia. In addition, this study included constraints that interfered with the implementation. A researcher-designed questionnaire was sent out to 107 science teachers in Jambi city and 70 (65.4%) teachers returned the questionnaires. The results showed that most of the participants did not use IbTI in their science classrooms. They predominantly used the more traditional teaching strategies such as lecturing despite of the fact that the use of IbTI had been recommended by the curriculum. Four major perceived-constraints including the unsupportive educational settings and insufficient facilities and knowledge had been identified interfered with the implementation. These findings may provide a logical explanation to the low science scores of the Indonesian students as showed by PISA. This study thus highlighted the need of providing the science teachers with reasonable supports for replacing their traditional-type instructions with more student-centered ones such as IbTI. The findings of this study are also beneficial for those in other developing countries who are endeavoring to implement inquiry due to the similarity in their educational context.

🔖

Cite This Article

EFFENDI-HASIBUAN, M. H., Harizon, H., Ngatijo, N., MUKMİNİN, A. (2019). The Inquiry-based Teaching Instruction (IbTI) in Indonesian Secondary Education: What Makes Science Teachers Successful Enact the Curriculum?. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 18–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/169241

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Abdullah, A. (2007). Kurikulum pendidikan di Indonesia sepanjang sejarah (Educational curriculum in Indonesia history). Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (Journal of Education and Culture), 13(66), 340-361.
  2. Alessandrini, K., & Larson, L. (2002). Teachers bridge to constructivism. Clearing House, 75, 118-121.
  3. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.
  4. Baker, W. P., & Leyva, K. (2003). What variables affect solubility? Science Activities, 40, 23-26.
  5. Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction: Assessing the inquiry level of classroom activities. The science teacher, 72(7), 30-33.
  6. Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94(4), 577-616.
  7. Chen, Y. (1999). Tradition and innovation in the Chinese school curriculum. Research in Education (61), 16-28.
  8. Colburn, A. (2000). An Inquiry Primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42-44.
  9. Cook, A., & Taylor, N. (1994). Robust adaptive processes: The case for laboratory assistants in Fiji high schools Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in South East Asia, 17(2), 7-15.
  10. Coppola, B. P. (2008). Selamat datang di Indonesia: Learning about chemistry and chemistry education in Indonesia. Journal of Chemical Education., 85(9), 1204-1209.
  11. Creswell. J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson: Pearson Education Incorporate. Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 91-142.
  12. Deters, K. (2004). Inquiry in the chemistry classroom. The Science Teacher, 71(10), 42-45.
  13. Education. (2007). Senior syllabus chemistry 2007. Brisbane: Queensland studies authoritiy Retrieved from http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/learning/1952.html.
  14. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge. Fay, M. E., & Bretz, S. L. (2008). Structuring the level of inquiry in your classroom. The science teacher, 75(5), 38-42.
  15. French, D. P. (2005). Was inquiry a mistake? Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(1), 60-62.
  16. Gallagher, J. J. (1987). A summa