Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Air quality modelling for prediction of dust concentrations in iron ore mines of Saranda region, Jharkhand, India

Pages
675–688
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, it was suggested that all the existing working mines as well as proposed operative mines in the region should use the transportation from mine to the nearest railway siding by covered conveyor belts and bunker loading systems with the use of scientific dust suppression systems at transfer points.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Air quality monitoring was conducted in 12 working, 29 closed and 18 proposed ion ore mines to assess the existing baseline air quality status in Saranda region of West Singhbhum district in the Jharkhand state of India.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Transportation of iron ore by conveyor belts from the pit head to the bunkers at the nearest railway siding, and thereafter from the bunkers to the user site by covered railway wagons demonstrated the best possible alternative mechanism for reducing particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) concentrations in the region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, it was suggested that all the existing working mines as well as proposed operative mines in the region should use the transportation from mine to the nearest railway siding by covered conveyor belts and bunker loading systems with the use of scientific dust suppression systems at transfer points.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Air quality monitoring was conducted in 12 working, 29 closed and 18 proposed ion ore mines to assess the existing baseline air quality status in Saranda region of West Singhbhum district in the Jharkhand state of India. Air quality modelling was carried out to predict the dust concentrations that likely to arise as a result of the several mine operations. This modelling analysis enabled the effective mitigating measures to control mining related air pollution. It was observed that the main cause of particulate matter generation in the region is due to the road transportation of ore. Transportation of iron ore by conveyor belts from the pit head to the bunkers at the nearest railway siding, and thereafter from the bunkers to the user site by covered railway wagons demonstrated the best possible alternative mechanism for reducing particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) concentrations in the region. It was predicted that concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 would be below or slightly higher than the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) in most of the surroundings and higher within mine leasehold areas. Air pollution levels can be minimized by implementing effective control measures. Consequently, it was suggested that all the existing working mines as well as proposed operative mines in the region should use the transportation from mine to the nearest railway siding by covered conveyor belts and bunker loading systems with the use of scientific dust suppression systems at transfer points.

🔖

Cite This Article

CHAULYA, S., TRIVEDI, R., KUMAR, A. P., TIWARY, R., SINGH, R., PANDEY, P., KUMAR, R. A. (2019). Air quality modelling for prediction of dust concentrations in iron ore mines of Saranda region, Jharkhand, India. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 675–688. https://ajindex.com/articles/167609

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ahmad, A.F., Sharma, H.K., Ahmad, R.M., Rao, R.J., 2014. Impact of mining activities on various environmental attributes with specific reference to health impacts in Shatabdipuram, Gwalior, India. Int. Res. J. Environ. Sci. 6 (3), 81–87.
  2. Almbauer, R.A., Piringer, M., Baumann, K., Oettle, D., Sturm, P.J., 2001. Analysis of the daily variations of winter time air pollution concentrations in the city of Graz, Austria. Environ. Monit. Assess. 65, 79–87.
  3. Asifa, Z., Chena, Z., Hanb, Yi, 2018. Air quality modeling for effective environmental management in the mining region. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 68 (9), 1001–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2018.1463301. California Department of Transportation, 1979. CALINE3-A Versatile Dispersion Model for Predicting Air Pollutant Levels Near Highways and Arterial Streets. Office of Transportation Laboratory Department of Transportation, State of California U.S.A, Sacramento, California 95807 No. FAWA/CA/TL-79/23. Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), 2007. Development of Clean Technology for Iron Ore Mines Development of Environmental Standards. Report on Comprehensive Industry Document on Iron Ore Mining by Central Pollution Control Board. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi, pp. 299. Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), 2009. National Ambient Air Quality Standard. Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, Government of India, New Delhi, India. Chaturvedi, N., Patra, H.K., 2016. Iron ore mining, waste generation, environmental problems and their mitigation through phytoremediation technology. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 5 (1), 398–420.
  4. Chaudhari, P.R., Gajghate, D.G., 2000. Assessment of air pollution effect on plants – a review. Indian J. Environ. Protect. 20, 925–933.
  5. Chaulya, S.K., 2003a. Air quality standard exceedance and management in an Indian mining area. Environ. Conserv. 30 (3), 266–273.
  6. Chaulya, S.K., 2003b. Assessment and management of air quality in a mining area. Environ. Qual. Manag. 12 (4), 45–59.
  7. Chaulya, S.K., 2005. Air quality status of an opencast mining area in India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 105 (1–3), 369–389.
  8. Chaulya, S.K., 2006. Emission rate formulae for surface iron ore mining activities. Environ. Model. Assess. 11, 361–370.
  9. Chaulya, S.K., Ahmad, M., Singh, R.S., Bandyopadhyay, L.K., Bondyopadhay, C., Mondal, G.C., 2003. Validation of two air quality models for Indian mining conditions. Environ. Monit. Assess. 82, 23–43.
  10. Chaulya, S.K., Chakrab