SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 1975 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

A systematic review of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty/percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

Shengping YANG
Changxian CHEN
Hanlong WANG
Zhiqiang WU
Lianqun LİU
Pages
290–297
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main operative complications were bonecement leakage and adjacent vertebral fracture, without difference between the two groups.Conclusions: In view of the current evidence, there is insufŞcient evidence to show any difference between the unilateral and bilateral approaches in both the PVP and PKP treatment in osteoporoticvertebral compression fractures.Level of Evidence: Level I, Therapeutic study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the unilateral and bilateral approaches in treatingosteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Methods: Based on the principles and methods of the Cochrane systematic reviews, the records of theCochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese Bio-medicine database, China Journal Full-textDatabase, VIP database, and Wanfang database were reviewed until October 2014.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The RevMan Software 5.0 was used for meta-analysis.Results: Fifteen randomized controlled trials with a total of 850 patients were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main operative complications were bonecement leakage and adjacent vertebral fracture, without difference between the two groups.Conclusions: In view of the current evidence, there is insufŞcient evidence to show any difference between the unilateral and bilateral approaches in both the PVP and PKP treatment in osteoporoticvertebral compression fractures.Level of Evidence: Level I, Therapeutic study.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the unilateral and bilateral approaches in treatingosteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Methods: Based on the principles and methods of the Cochrane systematic reviews, the records of theCochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese Bio-medicine database, China Journal Full-textDatabase, VIP database, and Wanfang database were reviewed until October 2014. The randomizedcontrolled trials on unilateral and bilateral approaches to percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP)/percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures were included. The risk of biasof included trials was assessed based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of InterventionsVersion. The RevMan Software 5.0 was used for meta-analysis.Results: Fifteen randomized controlled trials with a total of 850 patients were included. Risk of bias inthe included studies was inevitable. There was no statistically signiŞcant difference in visual analog scale,vertebral height, kyphotic angular, and quality of life. The main operative complications were bonecement leakage and adjacent vertebral fracture, without difference between the two groups.Conclusions: In view of the current evidence, there is insufŞcient evidence to show any difference between the unilateral and bilateral approaches in both the PVP and PKP treatment in osteoporoticvertebral compression fractures.Level of Evidence: Level I, Therapeutic study.

🔖

Cite This Article

YANG, S., CHEN, C., WANG, H., WU, Z., LİU, L. (1975). A systematic review of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty/percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 290–297. https://ajindex.com/articles/167595

References (13)

  1. Dervis E. Oral implications of osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, OralRadiol, Endodontol. 2005;100(3):349e356
  2. Hallberg I, Rosenqvist A, Kartous L, Lofman O, Wahlstr € om O, Toss G. Health- €related quality of life after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(10):834e841. 3. linville II Douglas A. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. South Med J. 2002;95(6):583e587
  3. Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA. New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty andvertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures.Spine. 2001;26(14):1511e1515
  4. Ma X, Xing D, Ma J, Xu W, Wang J, Chen Y. Balloon kyphoplasty versuspercutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compressionfracture: grading the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Spine J. 2012;21(9):1844e1859
  5. Kobayashi K, Shimoyama K, Nakamura K, Murata K. Percutaneous vertebroplasty immediately relieves pain of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and prevents prolonged immobilization of patients. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(2):360e367
  6. Yang Z, Tan J, Xu Y, et al. Treatment of MM-associated spinal fracture withpercutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and chemotherapy. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(5):912e919
  7. Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidencebased guidelines. BMJ. 2001;323(7308):334e336
  8. World Health Organization. Assessment of Osteoporosis at the Primary HealthCare Level; 2008. Available from:
  9. Higgins JP and Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane collaboration.Available from:
  10. Sun G, Jin P, Hao RS, et al. Percutaneous kyphoplasty with double or singleballoon in treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compressive fracture:aclinical controlled study. Natl Med J China. 2008;88(3):149e152 [in Chinese]
  11. Sun G, Jin P, Liu XW, et al. Kyphoplasty with single balloon inflation followedby cement filling for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J ClinRehabil Tissue Eng Res. 2008;12(6):1179e1183 [in Chinese]
  12. Song BK, Eun JP, Oh YM. Clinical and radiological comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(10):1717e1723
  13. Chen HL. Comparison of therapeutic effects of unilateral and bilateral bonecement plasty for thoracic and lumbar vertebral compres