Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2017 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4

The comparison of the effects of a novel hydrogel compound and traditional hyaluronate following micro-fracture procedure in a rat full-thickness chondral defect model

Pages
331–336
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Group 3 showed statistically signiŞcant improvement in terms of ‘cell morphology’ and‘integration of donor with host’ when compared to Group 2 (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Intra-articular injection of HAeCSeNAG compound after micro-fracture results in signiŞcantly improved repair tissue in rats' chondral defects when compared to HA regarding the donorintegration and cell morphology.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this experimental study was to investigate the impact of HAeCSeNAG compound(hyaluronate, sodium chondroitin sulfate, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine) on the quality of repair tissue aftermicro-fracture and to compare it with HA (hyaluronat), in a rat full-thickness chondral defect model.Methods: Full-thickness chondral defects were created in a non-weight bearing area by using a handle2.7-mm drill bit, in the right knees of 33 SpragueeDawley rats.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Two weeks after surgery, 3 groups were randomly formed among the rats(n¼ 33).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Group 3 showed statistically signiŞcant improvement in terms of ‘cell morphology’ and‘integration of donor with host’ when compared to Group 2 (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Intra-articular injection of HAeCSeNAG compound after micro-fracture results in signiŞcantly improved repair tissue in rats' chondral defects when compared to HA regarding the donorintegration and cell morphology.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this experimental study was to investigate the impact of HAeCSeNAG compound(hyaluronate, sodium chondroitin sulfate, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine) on the quality of repair tissue aftermicro-fracture and to compare it with HA (hyaluronat), in a rat full-thickness chondral defect model.Methods: Full-thickness chondral defects were created in a non-weight bearing area by using a handle2.7-mm drill bit, in the right knees of 33 SpragueeDawley rats. Each specimen then underwent microfracture using a needle. Two weeks after surgery, 3 groups were randomly formed among the rats(n¼ 33). In Group 1, 0.2 mL of sterile saline solution (0.9%) was injected. In Group 2, 0.2 mL HA with amean molecular weight of 1.2 Mda was injected. In Group 3, 0.2 mL of HAeCSeNAG compound (hyaluronate, sodium chondroitin sulfate, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine) was injected. The injections were appliedon the 14th, the 21st and the 28th postoperative days. All rats were sacriŞced on the 42nd postoperativeday. Histological analysis of the repair tissue was performed for each specimen by two blinded observersusing Wakitani scoring system.Results: There was signiŞcantly improved repair tissue in both Group 3 and Group 2 when comparedwith Group 1. Group 3 showed statistically signiŞcant improvement in terms of ‘cell morphology’ and‘integration of donor with host’ when compared to Group 2 (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Intra-articular injection of HAeCSeNAG compound after micro-fracture results in signiŞcantly improved repair tissue in rats' chondral defects when compared to HA regarding the donorintegration and cell morphology.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKMAN, Y. E., ŞÜKÜR, E., ŞENEL, A., SUKUR, N. E. O., TALU, E. C. K., ÖZTÜRKMEN, Y. (2017). The comparison of the effects of a novel hydrogel compound and traditional hyaluronate following micro-fracture procedure in a rat full-thickness chondral defect model. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4, 331–336. https://ajindex.com/articles/167593

References (12)

  1. Bedi A, Feeley BT, Williams RJ. Management of articular cartilage defects of the knee. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2010 Apr;92(4):994e1009
  2. Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ, Kocher MS, Gill TJ, Rodkey WG. Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2003 MayeJun;19(5):477e484
  3. Knutsen G, Drogset JO, Engebretsen L, et al. A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture. Findings at five years. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2007 Oct;89(10):2105e2112
  4. Kreuz PC, Erggelet C, Steinwachs MR, et al. Is microfracture of chondral defects in the knee associated with different results in patients aged 40 years or younger? Arthroscopy. 2006 Nov;22(11):1180e1186
  5. Goyal D, Keyhani S, Lee EH, Hui JH. Evidence-based status of microfracture technique: a systematic review of level I and II studies. Arthroscopy. 2013 Sep;29(9):1579e1588
  6. Gobbi A, Nunag P, Malinowski K. Treatment of full thickness chondral lesions of the knee with microfracture in a group of athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Apr;13(3):213e221
  7. Solheim E, Hegna J, Inderhaug E, Øyen J, Harlem T, Strand T. Results at 10-14 years after microfracture treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 May;24(5):1587e1593
  8. Gudas R, Gudaite A, Pocius A, et al. Ten-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized clinical study of mosaic osteo-chondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee joint of athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Nov;40(11):2499e2508
  9. Mithoefer K, McAdams T, Williams RJ, Kreuz PC, Mandelbaum BR. Clinical ef- ficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee: an evidence-based systematic analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Oct;37(10): 2053e2063
  10. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Rodrigo JJ. Microfracture: surgical technique and rehabilitation to treat chondral defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Oct;391(Suppl):362e369
  11. Saris DB, Vanlauwe J, Victor J, et al. Treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better clinical outcome at 36 months in a randomized trial compared to microfracture. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov;37(Suppl 1):10se19s
  12. Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Matheny LM, Guillet A, Hanson CM, Willimon SC. Outcomes following microfracture of full-thickness articular cartilage lesions ofthe