Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Multiparametric MRI for the detection of local recurrence of prostate cancer in the setting of biochemical recurrence after low dose rate brachytherapy

Pages
46–53
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Radiologists of varying experience demonstrated moderate agreement in detecting recurrence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:URPOSE Prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRl) has utility in detecting post—ra— diotherapy local recurrence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We conducted multireader study to evaluate the diagnostic per— formance of mpMRl for local recurrence after low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Radiologists of varying experience demonstrated moderate agreement in detecting recurrence.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

URPOSE Prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRl) has utility in detecting post—ra— diotherapy local recurrence. We conducted multireader study to evaluate the diagnostic per— formance of mpMRl for local recurrence after low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy. METHODS total of 19 patients with biochemical recurrence after LDR brachytherapy underwent 3T en— dorectal coil mpMRl with T2—weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCE) and diffusion—weighted imaging (DWI) with pathologic confirmation. Prospective reads by an experi— enced prostate radiologist were compared with reads from radiologists of varying experience. Readers identified suspicious lesions and rated each MRI detection parameter. MRI—detected le— sions were considered true-positive with ipsilateral pathologic confirmation. Inferences for sen— sitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), kappa, and index of specific agreement were made with the use of bootstrap resampling. RESULTS Pathologically confirmed recurrence was found in 15 of 19 patients. True positive recurrences identified by mpMRl were frequently located in the transition zone (46.7%) and seminal vesicles (30%). On patient—based analysis, average sensitivity of mpMRl was 88% (standard error [SE], 3.5%). For highly suspicious lesions, specificity of mpMRl was 75% (SE, 16.5%). On lesion—based analysis, the average PPV was 62% (SE, 6.7%) for all lesions and 78.7% (SE, 10.3%) for highly sus— picious lesions. The average PPV for lesions invading the seminal vesicles was 88.8% (n=1 3). The average PPV was 66.6% (SE, 5.8%) for lesions identified with T2-weighted imaging, 64.9% (SE, 7.3%) for DCE, and 70% (SE, 7.3%) for DWI. CONCLUSION This series provides evidence that mpMRl after LDR brachytherapy is feasible with high pa— tient—based cancer detection rate. Radiologists of varying experience demonstrated moderate agreement in detecting recurrence.

🔖

Cite This Article

VALLE, L. F., GREER, M. D., SHİH, J. H., BARRETT, T., LAW, Y. M., ROSENKRANTZ, A. B., SHEBEL, H., MUTHİGİ, A., SU, D., MERİNO, M. J., WOOD, B. J., PİNTO, P. A., KRAUZE, A. V., KAUSHAL, A., CHOYKE, P. L., TÜRKBEY, B., CİTRİN, D. E. (2018). Multiparametric MRI for the detection of local recurrence of prostate cancer in the setting of biochemical recurrence after low dose rate brachytherapy. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 46–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/167268

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Marcus DM, Jani AB, Godette K, Rossi PJ. A review of low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy-techniques and outcomes. J Natl Med Assoc 2010
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Grimm P, Billiet I, Bostwick D, et al. Comparative analysis of prostate-specific antigen free survival outcomes for patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treatment by radical therapy. Results from the Prostate Cancer Results Study Group. BJU Int 2012
  3. 22–29. [CrossRef] 3. Rodda SL, Tyldesley S and Morris WJ. Toxicity outcomes in ASCENDE-RT: a multicenter randomized trial of dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer. Proceedings of the American Society for Radiation Oncology 57th Annual Meeting. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015
  4. 93(3 Suppl):S121. [CrossRef] 4. Grimm P and Sylvester J. Advances in brachytherapy. Rev Urol 2004
  5. 6(4 Suppl):S37–S48. 5. Petereit DG, Frank SJ, Viswanathan AN, et al. Brachytherapy: where has it gone? J Clin Oncol 2015
  6. 980–982. [CrossRef] 6. Ahmed KA, Davis BJ, Mynderse LA, et al. Comparison of biochemical failure rates between permanent prostate brachytherapy and radical retropubic prostatectomy as a function of posttherapy PSA nadir plus ‘X’. Radiat Oncol 2014
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Grimm PD, Blasko JC, Sylvester JE, Meier RM and Cavanagh W. 10-year biochemical (prostate-specific antigen) control of prostate cancer with 125 I brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001
  8. 31–40. [CrossRef] 8. Tanaka N, Asakawa I, Katayama E, et al. The biochemical recurrence-free rate in patients who underwent prostate low-dose-rate brachytherapy, using two different definitions. Radiat Oncol 2014
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Lacy JM, Wilson WA, Bole R, et al. Salvage brachytherapy for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer following primary brachytherapy. Prostate Cancer 2016
  10. Stevenson JP, Rosen M, Sun W, et al. Phase I trial of the antivascular agent combretastatin a4 phosphate on a 5-day schedule to patients with cancer: magnetic resonance imaging evidence for altered tumor blood flow. J Clin Oncol 2003
  11. 4428–4438. [CrossRef] 11. Turkbey B, Albert PS, Kurdziel K, Choyke PL. Imaging localized prostate cancer: current approaches and new developments. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009
  12. 1471–1480. [CrossRef] 12. Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, et al. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA 2015
  13. 390–397. [CrossRef] 13. Barchetti F, Panebianco V. Multiparamet