Journals / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2019 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

Hook Plate Applications in Type 3 Acromioclavicular Dislocations

Pages
222–226
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although conservative treatment of Type 3 AC dislocations can provide adequate functional results in the long term, we believe that early results of the surgical treatment using clavicle hook plate is a reliable and effective method especially in the young age group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are caused by sports injuries fall from height or traffic accidents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While the treatment of Type 1 and Type 2 in AC dislocations is conservative, the treatment of Type 4, 5 and 6 is surgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although conservative treatment of Type 3 AC dislocations can provide adequate functional results in the long term, we believe that early results of the surgical treatment using clavicle hook plate is a reliable and effective method especially in the young age group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are caused by sports injuries fall from height or traffic accidents. While the treatment of Type 1 and Type 2 in AC dislocations is conservative, the treatment of Type 4, 5 and 6 is surgery. Treatment of type III dislocations is controversial. In this study, we aimed to investigate the functional results of patients who surgical treatment by using clavicle hook plate in Type III AC joint dislocations 21 patients (18 males, 3 females; mean age 34 years) with Type III AC joint dislocation who were admitted to our clinic between 2015-2017 were treated with clavicle hook plate. The surgical results of the patients at the 6th month were evaluated according to the Constant score. Of the total 21 patient included in the study, n=18 were male (%86), and n=3 were female (%14). All patients were treated with clavicular hook plate. The average follow-up after treatment is 11 months. Functional results were obtained according to Constant scoring. There was no infection after surgery. Plaque irritation occurred in 2 patients and plaque was removed due to prolonged pain. 1 patient had recurrence. Although conservative treatment of Type 3 AC dislocations can provide adequate functional results in the long term, we believe that early results of the surgical treatment using clavicle hook plate is a reliable and effective method especially in the young age group.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, S., ADANAS, C. (2019). Hook Plate Applications in Type 3 Acromioclavicular Dislocations. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 222–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/166978

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Monig SP, Burger C, Helling HJ, Prokop A, Rehm KE. Treatment of complete acromioclavicular dislocation: present indications and surgical technique with biodegradable cords. Int J Sports Med 1999; 20: 560-562
  2. Mazzocca AD, Arciero RA, Bicos J. Evaluation and treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35: 316-329
  3. Mardani-Kivi M, Mirbolook A, Salariyeh M, Hashemi-Motlagh K, Saheb-Ekhtiari K. The comparison of Ethibond sutures and semitendinosus autograft in the surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2013; 47: 307-310
  4. Bannister GC, Wallace WA, Stableforth PG, Hutson MA. The management of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. A randomised prospective controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989; 71: 848-850
  5. Dias JJ, Steingold RF, Richardson RA, Tesfayohannes B, Gregg PJ. The conservative treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. Review after five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1987; 69: 719-722
  6. Pfahler M, Krodel A, Refior HJ. Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1994; 113: 308- 311
  7. Schlegel TF, Burks RT, Marcus RL, Dunn HK. A prospective evaluation of untreated acute grade III acromioclavicular separations. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29: 699-703
  8. Bektaşer B, Bozkurt M, Öçgüder A, Solak Ş, Oğuz T. Tip III akromiyoklaviküler eklem çıkıklarının modifiye Bosworth tekniği ile cerrahi tedavisi. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2004; 10: 245-249. 9. faraj A.A, Ketzer B. The use of a hookplate in the management of acromioclavicular injuries. Report of ten cases. acta Orthop Belg 2001; 67: 448-451
  9. Collins DN. Disorders of the acromioclavicular joint. In: Rockwood CA Jr, Matsen FA 3rd, Wirth MA, Lippitt SB, editors. The shoulder. Philadelphia: Saunders (Elsevier) 2009; 453-526
  10. Simovitch R, Sanders B, Ozbaydar M, et al. Acromioclavicular joint injuries: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009; 17: 207-219
  11. Bannister GC, Wallace WA, Stableforth PG, Hutson MA. The management of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. A randomised prospective controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1989; 71: 848-850
  12. Broos P, Stoffelen D, Van de Sijpe K, Fourneau I. Surgical management of complete Tossy III acromioclavicular joint dislocation with the Bosworth screw or the Wolter plate. A critical evaluation. Unfallchirurgie 1997; 23: 153-159
  13. Esenyel CZ, Oztürk K, Bülbül M, Ayanoğlu S, Ceylan HH. Coracoclavicular ligament repair and