SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Sayı: 34

The traces of Israiliyyat in Islamic literature: Paradise lost

İslâmî literatürde İsrailiyyat izleri: Cennet’in kaybı

Hakkı Şah YASDIMAN
Pages
37–64
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally the similariti1es and differences between the two religious traditions in terms of their approaches to the question of man’s fall from divine grace are compared in order to determine these two realigions mutual relations and interactions on the subject.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present research deals with the events that have occured in the wake of fall and mans’ sin of eating from the forbidden tree in Islam and Judaism.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, by evaluating primarily of the penalties given to the Serpent, Eve and Adam, the process that led to the removal of Adam and Eve from the Paradise.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally the similariti1es and differences between the two religious traditions in terms of their approaches to the question of man’s fall from divine grace are compared in order to determine these two realigions mutual relations and interactions on the subject.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present research deals with the events that have occured in the wake of fall and mans’ sin of eating from the forbidden tree in Islam and Judaism. In this context, by evaluating primarily of the penalties given to the Serpent, Eve and Adam, the process that led to the removal of Adam and Eve from the Paradise. Then, the repentance of Adam and Eve is discussed. Finally the similariti1es and differences between the two religious traditions in terms of their approaches to the question of man’s fall from divine grace are compared in order to determine these two realigions mutual relations and interactions on the subject.

Özet

Bu araştırmada İslam’da ve Yahudilik’te yasak ağaçtan yemenin arkasından gelişen olaylar ele alınmaktadır. Bu çerçevede, önce Şeytan/Yılan, Havva ve Adem’e verilen cezalar gözden geçirilmekte, arkasından Adem ve Havva’nın Cennet/Eden’den çıkarılış süreci incelenmektedir. Daha sonra da Adem ve Havva’nın tövbeleri üzerinde durulmaktadır. Araştırmanın sonunda her iki din arasında karşılaştırmalar yapılarak, benzer ve farklı yönler ortaya konulmakta, benzerliklerden hareketle de her iki din arasında ilişki kurulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YASDIMAN, H. Ş. (2011). The traces of Israiliyyat in Islamic literature: Paradise lost. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 34, 37–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/166947

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. A Dictionary of Comparative Religion, Ed. S. G. F. Brandon, Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1970. A Dictionary of Judaism and Christianity, Trinity Press International, Philadelphia, 1991. Ahmed b. Hanbel (ö. 241/855), Müsned, I-VI, Müessesetü Kurtuba, Mısır, t.y. Aiken, Lisa, To Be A Jewish Woman, Jason Aronson Inc., New Jersey, 1993.
  2. Akdemir, Salih, “Tarih Boyunca ve Kur’an-ı Kerim’de Kadın”, İslâmî Araştırmalar: Kadın Özel Sayısı, C. V, S. 4, Ankara, Ekim 1991.
  3. Arsel, İlhan, Şeriat ve Kadın, Orhanlar Matbaası, İstanbul, 1987.
  4. Ateş, Ali Osman, Hadis Temelli Kalıp Yargılarda Kadın, Beyan Yayınları, İstanbul, 2000.
  5. Aydemir, Abdullah, İslami Kaynaklara Göre Peygamberler, Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, Ankara, 1992.
  6. Baldwin, Geo. C., Represantetive Women: From Eve the Wife of the First to Mary, The Mother of the Second Adam, Sheldon &Company, New York, 1860. Bokser, Ben Zion (Rabbi), The Wisdom of the Talmud: A Thousand Years of Jewish Thought, Philosophical Library, New York, 1951.
  7. Brittain, Alfred and Mitchell Carroll, Woman: Women of Early Christianity, London, 1907. Buhârî, Ebû ‘Abdillah Muhammed b. İsmâ‘îl (ö.256/870), el-Câmiü’l-Müsnedü’s- Sahîhü’l-Muhtasar min Umûri Resûlillahi (s.a.s) ve Sünenihî ve Eyyâmihî, I-VIII, Çağrı Yayınları, İstanbul, 1413/1992. Bursevî, İsmail Hakkı, Ruhu’l-Beyan Tefsiri, Damla Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2002.
  8. Cohen, A., Everyman’s Talmud, E. P., Dutton & Co., Inc., New York, 1949.
  9. Cohen, Chaim, “Eden, Garden of”, The Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion, Ed. R. J. Zwi, Werblowsky & Geoffrey Wigador, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997
  10. Çalışlar, Oral, İslam’da Kadın ve Cinsellik, Afa Yayınları, İstanbul, 1994.
  11. Çelik, Yusuf, “Hz. Peygamber Döneminde Müslüman-Ehl-i Kitap Arasında Kurulan Sosyal İlişkiler”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İlâhiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Erzurum, 2005, S. 23, ss. 129-144.
  12. Davudoğlu, Ahmed, Sahîh-i Müslim Tercümesi ve Şerhi, I-XII, Sönmez Neşriyat, İstanbul, t.y. Encyclopedia Judaica, I-XVIII, 2nd Edition,
  13. Ed. Fred Skolnik, Michael Berenbaum, Keter Publishing House, Jerusalem, 2007.
  14. Erdem, Mustafa, Hazreti Adem (İlk İnsan), Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, Ankara, 2003.
  15. Erickson, Millard J., Christian Theology, Baker Book House, Michigan, 1985. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, “Woman, Biblical Concept Of ”, Ed. Walter A. Elwell, Baker Book House, Michigan, 1984.
  16. Gabrieli, F., “’Adam”, The Encyclopaedia of Islam, Ed. B. Lewis ve dğr. Luzac & Co., London, 1979,
  17. I-XI, C. I, ss. 176-178.
  18. Ginzberg, Louis, Th