Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Patient Activation in Chronic Diseases: Concept Analyse

Kronik Hastalıklarda Hasta Aktifliği: Kavram Analizi

Pages
45–51
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When patient’s activation level - belief about doing and maintaining the health behaviour, informaton and skill level, motivation status - are known, individualized care plans can be tailored

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Chronic diseases are the most leading cause of death in the world and also most of the health expenditure is used for treatment of chronic diseases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Reduction of the death rates is possible with the effective management of chronic disease, but patients generally don’t participate and also don’t expect to participate in medical care.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When patient’s activation level - belief about doing and maintaining the health behaviour, informaton and skill level, motivation status - are known, individualized care plans can be tailored
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hasta aktifliği · öz yönetim · öz bakım

Abstract

Chronic diseases are the most leading cause of death in the world and also most of the health expenditure is used for treatment of chronic diseases. Reduction of the death rates is possible with the effective management of chronic disease, but patients generally don’t participate and also don’t expect to participate in medical care. A number of researchers have found patient, who participate in ilness management actively, perform more self care behaviours and present better health outcomes. Patient activation especially important for individuals who have chronic disease; because they need to pursue their medical treatments, observe their conditions, do life style changes and be in a decision making role. Concept analysis method is used in this study and literature about the situation of Chronic diseases in Turkey also in the World, patient activation in chronic disease management and effect of active patient management on care is scanned and examined. As a result, determining the care requirements and outcomes, the most important role is belong to patient. When patient’s activation level - belief about doing and maintaining the health behaviour, informaton and skill level, motivation status - are known, individualized care plans can be tailored

Özet

Kronik hastalıklar, dünyada ölüm nedenlerinin başında yer almakta ve sağlık harcamalarının büyük kısmı bu hastalıkların tedavisi için yapılmaktadır. Ölüm oranlarının azaltılması, kronik hastalığın etkili yönetimi ile mümkündür, ancak hastalar genellikle tıbbi bakımda yer almamakta, yer almayı da beklememektedirler. Araştırmalar hastalık yönetiminde aktif olarak yer alan bireylerin, daha fazla öz bakım davranışı gösterdiklerini ve daha iyi sağlık çıktıları ortaya koyduklarını göstermektedir. Hasta aktifliği özellikle kronik hastalığı olan bireylerde önemlidir, çünkü bireylerin, tedavi rejimlerini takip etmeleri, durumlarını gözlemlemeleri, yaşam şekli değişiklikleri yapmaları ve karar verici rolde olmaları gerekir. Kavram analizi rehberliğinde yazılan bu çalışmada kronik hastalıkların Türkiye ve dünyadaki durumu, kronik hastalık yönetiminde hasta aktifliği ve aktif hasta yönetiminin bakıma etkisini ele alan literatür taranmıştır. Sonuç olarak, bakım gereksinimlerini ve bakım çıktılarını belirlemede, en büyük rolün hastaya ait olduğu, bireylerin aktiflik düzeyinin - sağlık davranışını yapıp sürdürebileceğine dair inancının, bilgi ve beceri düzeyinin, motivasyonunun - bilinmesinin, bireye özgü girişimlerin planlanmasını destekleyeceği görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOŞAR, C., BESEN, D. B. (2015). Patient Activation in Chronic Diseases: Concept Analyse. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 45–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/166937

References (13)

  1. Alegría, M., Sribney, W., Perez, D., Laderman, M. & Keefe, K., 2009, The Role of Patient Activation on Patient–Provider Communication and Quality of Care for US and Foreign Born Latino Patients, J Gen Intern Med, 24(3), 534–41.
  2. Budd, R. J., 1996, The structure of the Readiness to Change Questionnaire: A test of Prochaska & DiClemente’s transtheoretical model, British Journal of Health Pgchology, 1, 365-376.
  3. Bandura, A., 1982, Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency, American Psychologist, 37(2),122-47.
  4. Begum, N., Donald, M., Ozolins, L. Z. & Dower, J., 2011, Hospital admissions, emergency department utilisation and patient activation for self-management among people with diabetes, Daibetes Research and Clinical Practice, 93, 260- 267. Champion, V. L., Skinner, C. S., (2008),
  5. The Health Belief Model, Glanz K., Rimer B. K., & Viswanath K., In Health Behavior and Health Education Theory, Research and Practice, Wiley Imprent, 4th edition, 45-62.
  6. Dağ, İ., 2002, Kontrol Odağı Ölçeği (KOÖ): Ölçek Geliştirme, Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik Çalışması, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 2002, 17 (49), 77 – 90. Deen, D., Lu, W., Rothstein, D., Santana, L. & Gold, M., 2011, Asking questions: The effect of a brief intervention in community health centers on patient activation, Patient Education and Counseling, 84, 257–260.
  7. Dixon, A., Hibbard, J. & Tusler, M., 2009, How do people with different levels of activation self manage their chronic conditions, Patient, 2 (4), 257-268.
  8. DiClemente, C.C., 2007, The Transtheorotical Model of İntensional Behavioral Change, Drug and Alcohol today, 7(1), 29-33.
  9. Freeman, A., Dolan, M., 2001, Revisiting Prochaska and DiClemente's Stages of Change Theory: An Expansion and Specification to Aid in Treatment Planning and Outcome Evaluation, Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 8, 224-234.
  10. Greene, J, Hibbard, J., 2011, Why Does Patient Activation Matter? An Examination of the Relationships Between Patient Activation and Health-Related Outcomes, J Gen Intern Med, 27(5), 520–6. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases, 2010. Erişim http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789240686458_ eng.pdf?ua=1, 30.05.2014.
  11. Gözüm, S. & Aydın, İ., 2004, Validation Evidence for Turkish Adaptation of Champion’s Health Belief Model Scales, Cancer Nursing, 27( 6), 491-498.
  12. Gözüm, S. & Aksayan, S., 1999, Öz etkililik Yeterlik Ölçeğinin Türkçe Formunun Güvenirlik ve Geçerliği, Atatürk Üniv. Hemşirelik Yüksekoukul Dergisi, 2 (1), 21-34.
  13. Greenfıeld, S., Kaplan, S. & Ware, J