SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Aviation / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 3

Investigation of the Use of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods in Air Transportation Industry through Bibliometric Analysis

Olcay Kalan(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK FAKÜLTESİ, ENDÜSTRİ MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ, YÖNEYLEM ARAŞTIRMASI ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0001-5828-7743
Fatma Şeyma Yüksel(Adıyaman)0000-0002-8080-2665
Melek Işık(Çukurova)0000-0001-6078-7026
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained, it was revealed that the author who worked the most using MCDM techniques in the air transportation system was “Dragan PAMUCAR”, the journal that accepted the most publications on this subject was “Journal of Air Transport Management”, and the most frequently preferred keywords were “model”, “selection”, “ahp”, “performance” and “topsis”.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, studies using multi-criteria decision-making techniques (MCDM) in the air transportation system between 2020 and 2025 were evaluated and bibliometric analysis was conducted to lead future studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 314 publications were analyzed with the Bibliometrix R package (Biblioshiny interface) and VOSviewer software.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained, it was revealed that the author who worked the most using MCDM techniques in the air transportation system was “Dragan PAMUCAR”, the journal that accepted the most publications on this subject was “Journal of Air Transport Management”, and the most frequently preferred keywords were “model”, “selection”, “ahp”, “performance” and “topsis”.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Air transportation · Bibliometric analysis · Decision analysis

Abstract

In this study, studies using multi-criteria decision-making techniques (MCDM) in the air transportation system between 2020 and 2025 were evaluated and bibliometric analysis was conducted to lead future studies. The aim of the study is to investigate the use of decision-making techniques in the air transportation system and to provide information for researchers. The data were obtained from the Web of Science (WOS) database, organized with bibtex format and analyzed. A total of 314 publications were analyzed with the Bibliometrix R package (Biblioshiny interface) and VOSviewer software. According to the results obtained, it was revealed that the author who worked the most using MCDM techniques in the air transportation system was “Dragan PAMUCAR”, the journal that accepted the most publications on this subject was “Journal of Air Transport Management”, and the most frequently preferred keywords were “model”, “selection”, “ahp”, “performance” and “topsis”.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kalan, O., Yüksel, F. Ş., Işık, M. (2026). Investigation of the Use of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods in Air Transportation Industry through Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Aviation, Volume: 10 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1956247

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (58)

  1. Akyurt, I. Z., Pamucar, D., Deveci, M., Kalan, O. and Kuvvetli, Y. (2021). A flight base selection for flight academy using a rough MACBETH and RAFSI based decision-making analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 258-273.
  2. Alkhatib, S. F. and Migdadi, Y. K. A. A. (2021). A novel technique for evaluating and ranking green airlines: Benchmarking-base comparison. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 32(2), 210-226.
  3. Aria, M. and Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for com-prehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
  4. Ayçin, E. (2019). Çok kriterli karar verme: bilgisayar uygulamalı çözümler. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  5. Bakir, M., Akan, Ş., Kiraci, K., Karabasevic, D., Stanujkic, D. and Popovic, G. (2020). Multiple-criteria approach of the operational per-formance evaluation in the airline industry: Evidence from the emerg-ing markets. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 23(2), 149-172. https://ideas.repec.org/a/rjr/romjef/vy2020i2p149-172.html
  6. Bakır, M., Akan, Ş. and Özdemir, E. (2021). Regional aircraft selection with fuzzy PIPRECIA and fuzzy MARCOS: A case study of the Turkish airline industry. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 19(3), 423-445.
  7. Bakır, M., Özdemir, E. and Akan, Ş. (2021). A novel MADM ap-proach to the ground-handling agent selection problem in B2B mar-kets. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 18(5), 684-707.
  8. Bakır, M., Özdemir, E., Akan, Ş. and Atalık, Ö. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of airport service quality. Journal of Air Transport Management, 104, 102273.
  9. Bhadra, D., Dhar, N. R. and Salam, M. A. (2022). Sensitivity analysis of the integrated AHP-TOPSIS and CRITIC- TOPSIS method for se-lection of the natural fiber. Materials today: proceedings, 56, 2618-2629.
  10. Bordeaux, G., Couto, A. and Jimenez, E. (2025). A combined approach using structural equation modeling and analytic hierarchy process in hub airports selection. Journal of Air Transport Management, 124, 102752.
  11. Boyacı, A. Ç. and Tüzemen, M. Ç. (2022). Multi-criteria decision-making approaches for aircraft-material selection problem. Interna-tional Journal of Materials and Product Technology, 64(1), 45-68.
  12. Büyüközkan, G., Havle, C. A. and Feyzioğlu, O. (2020a). A new digital service quality model and its strategic analysis in aviation industry using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy AHP. Journal of Air Transport Management, 86, 101817.
  13. Büyüközkan, G., Havle, C. A. and Feyzioğlu, O. (2021a). An integrated SWOT based fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MARCOS methodology for digital transformation strategy analysis in airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 97, 102142.
  14. Büyüközkan, G., Havle, C. A. and Feyzioğlu, O. (2021b). Digital com-petency evaluation of low-cost airlines using an integrated IVIF AHP and IVIF VIKOR methodology. Journal of Air Transport Manage-ment, 91, 101998.
  15. Büyüközkan, G., Havle, C. A., Feyzioğlu, O. and Göçer, F. (2020b). A combined group decision making based IFCM and SERVQUAL ap-proach for strategic analysis of airline service quality. Journal of Intel-ligent & Fuzzy Systems, 38(1), 859-872.
  16. Chang, K. F., Hsu, M. and Swanson, S. (2023). How to decode the value-consequence-attribute relationship: the application of TISM and ANP techniques. Journal of Modelling in Management, 18(2), 318-342.
  17. Chen, Y., Yu, S., Chu, J., Yu, M. and Chen, D. (2021). Fuzzy emotional evaluation of color matching for aircraft cockpit design. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 40(3), 3899-3917.
  18. Deveci, M., Çiftçi, M. E., Isik, M., Pamucar, D., Wen, X., Chin, T. and Kadry, S. (2024). Aircraft type selection using fuzzy trigonometric based OPA and RAFSI model. Information Sciences, 673, 120688.
  19. Deveci, M., Öner, S. C., Ciftci, M. E., Özcan, E. and Pamucar, D. (2022). Interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy Entropy- based WASPAS ap-proach for aircraft type selection. Applied Soft Computing, 114, 108076.
  20. Dožić, S. (2019). Multi-criteria decision making methods: Application in the aviation industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 79, 101683.
  21. Duan, X., Yu, S., Chu, J. and Cong, Y. (2024). A comprehensive assessment of environmental factors in aircraft cockpit based on fuzzy evaluation. Work, 77(1), 171-184.
  22. Fan, J., Zhong, D., Zhang, Y., Yu, S., Chu, J., Yu, M.,. and Huang, Y. (2022). A hybrid approach based on rough- AHP for evaluation in-flight service quality. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 81(21), 30797-30819.
  23. Garg, C. P. and Sharma, A. (2024). Time to evaluate service quality indicators for delivering service excellence at airports: Case of India. Quality Management Journal, 31(4), 253-270.
  24. Huang, J., Xu, D. H., Liu, H. C. and Song, M. S. (2019). A new model for failure mode and effect analysis integrating linguistic Z-numbers and projection method. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 29(3), 530-538.
  25. Jahangiri, M., Shamsabadi, A. A., Mostafaeipour, A., Rezaei, M., Yousefi, Y. and Pomares, L. M. (2020). Using fuzzy MCDM tech-nique to find the best location in Qatar for exploiting wind and solar energy to generate hydrogen and electricity. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(27), 13862-13875.
  26. Jia, Q., Hu, H. Q. and Yu, J. L. (2021). The model construction in airport renewable energy system scale planning based in Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Energy Reports, 7, 92-98.
  27. Kiracı, K. and Akan, E. (2020). Aircraft selection by applying AHP and TOPSIS in interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Journal of Air Transport Management, 89, 101924.
  28. Kiracı, K. and Bakır, M. (2020). Evaluation of airlines performance using an integrated CRITIC and CODAS methodology: The case of star alliance member airlines. Studies in Business and Economics, 15(1), 83-99.
  29. Kumar, A., Aswin, A. and Gupta, H. (2020). Evaluating green perfor-mance of the airports using hybrid BWM and VIKOR methodology. Tourism Management, 76, 103941.
  30. Li, B., Zhang, Y. and Xu, Z. (2021). Limited interval-valued probabil-istic linguistic term sets in evaluating airline service quality. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(6), 1330-1346.
  31. Liu, J., Yu, S. and Chu, J. (2020). Comfort evaluation of an aircraft cabin system employing a hybrid model. Sustainability, 12(20), 8503.
  32. Markatos, D. N. and Pantelakis, S. G. (2023). Implementation of a holistic MCDM-based approach to assess and compare aircraft, under the prism of sustainable aviation. Aerospace, 10(3), 240.
  33. Martyn, J. (1964). Bibliographic coupling. Journal of documentation, 20(4), 236-236.
  34. Mizrak, F., Polat, L. and Tasar, S. A. (2024). Applying Entropy Weighting and 2-Tuple Linguistic T-Spherical Fuzzy MCDM: A Case Study of Developing a Strategic Sustainability Plan for Istanbul Airport. Sustainability, 16(24), 11104.
  35. Nataliia, F., Anastasiia, K., Andrii, L., Vitalii, L. and Ievgen, V. (2023, December). Force Majeure Circumstances in Aviation Activities. In Conference on Integrated Computer Technologies in Mechanical En-gineering– Synergetic Engineering (pp. 223-237). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  36. Omole, A. O. (2022). Contemporary Issues of the US Aviation Industry. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365668035_Contemporary_Issues_of_the_US_Aviation_Industr y.
  37. Omrani, H., Shamsi, M. and Emrouznejad, A. (2023). Evaluating sus-tainable efficiency of decision-making units considering undesirable outputs: an application to airline using integrated multi-objective DEA-TOPSIS. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(7), 5899-5930.
  38. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D.,. & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372.
  39. Pamucar, D., Deveci, M., Canıtez, F. and Lukovac, V. (2020). Select-ing an airport ground access mode using novel fuzzy LBWA-WASPAS-H decision making model. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 93, 103703.
  40. Pamucar, D., Özçalıcı, M. and Gurler, H. E. (2025). Evaluation of the efficiency of world airports using WENSLO- ARTASI and Monte-Carlo simulation. Journal of Air Transport Management, 124, 102749.
  41. Pamučar, D., Petrović, I., Ćirović, G. and Stević, Ž. (2022). An exten-sion of the MABAC and OS model using linguistic neutrosophic numbers: selection of unmanned aircraft for fighting forest fires. Transport, 37(2), 73- 97.
  42. Pamucar, D., Yazdani, M., Montero-Simo, M. J., Araque-Padilla, R. A. and Mohammed, A. (2021). Multi-criteria decision analysis towards robust service quality measurement. Expert Systems with Applications, 170, 114508.
  43. Roukounis, C. N., Aretoulis, G. and Karambas, T. (2020). A combina-tion of PROMETHEE and goal programming methods for the evalua-tion of water airport connections. International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), 12(2), 50-66.
  44. Saeed, M., Haq, R. S. U., Ahmed, S., Siddiqui, F., Mateen, N., Ah-med, K. A.,. and Pamučar, D. (2024). Sustainable selection of micro-wave absorbing materials: A green evaluation under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Cleaner Materials, 11, 100236.
  45. Sánchez-Lozano, J. M. and Rodríguez, O. N. (2020). Application of Fuzzy Reference Ideal Method (FRIM) to the military advanced train-ing aircraft selection. Applied soft computing, 88, 106061.
  46. Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new meas-ure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the Ameri-can Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
  47. Tanrıverdi, G. and Lezki, Ş. (2021). Istanbul Airport (IGA) and quest of best competitive strategy for air cargo carriers in new competition environment: A fuzzy multi-criteria approach. Journal of Air Transport Management, 95, 102088.
  48. Teixeira, R., Antunes, J. J. M., Wanke, P., Correa, H. L. and Tan, Y. (2024). Customer satisfaction and airport efficiency in Brazil: a hybrid NDEA-AHP approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31(7), 2239-2266.
  49. Vatankhah, S., Darvishmotevali, M., Rahimi, R., Jamali, S. M. and Ale Ebrahim, N. (2023). Assessing the application of multi-criteria decision making techniques in hospitality and tourism research: a bibliometric study. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(7), 2590-2623.
  50. Wang, L., Fan, H., Chu, J., Chen, D. and Yu, S. (2021). Effect of personal space invasion on passenger comfort and comfort design of an aircraft cabin. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021(1), 9968548.
  51. Xie, H., Li, Y., Pu, Y., Zhang, C. and Huang, J. (2024). Evaluating airline service quality through a comprehensive text-mining and multi-criteria decision-making analysis. Journal of Air Transport Man-agement, 120, 102655.
  52. Xiong, S. H., Chen, Z. S., Chiclana, F., Chin, K. S. and Skibniewski, M. J. (2022). Proportional hesitant 2‐tuple linguistic distance measurements and extended VIKOR method: Case study of evaluation and selection of green airport plans. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 37(7), 4113-4162.
  53. Zeng, J. H., Huang, J. Y., Zhong, Q. W., Zhu, D. W. and Dai, Y. (2024). Risk evaluation for human factors of flight dispatcher based on the hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS-DEMATEL-ISM approach: A case study in Sichuan Airlines. International Journal of Computational In-telligence Systems, 17(1), 271.
  54. Zhou, H., Li, Y. and Gu, Y. (2021, July). Research on evaluation of airport service quality based on improved AHP and Topsis methods. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport (Vol. 174, No. 4, pp. 267- 278). Thomas Telford Ltd.
  55. Zupic, I. and Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472.
  56. Fan, J., Zhong, D., Zhang, Y., Yu, S., Chu, J., Yu, M.,. and Huang, Y. (2022). A hybrid approach based on rough- AHP for evaluation in-flight service quality. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 81(21), 30797-30819.
  57. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D.,. & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372.
  58. Saeed, M., Haq, R. S. U., Ahmed, S., Siddiqui, F., Mateen, N., Ah-med, K. A.,. and Pamučar, D. (2024). Sustainable selection of micro-wave absorbing materials: A green evaluation under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Cleaner Materials, 11, 100236.