Journals / New Trends in Medicine Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 3

Clinical, Laboratory, and Treatment Characteristics of Seropositive and Seronegative Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Real-World Cohort Study

Nihal Lermi(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, İSTANBUL KARTAL DR. LÜTFİ KIRDAR HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER)0000-0002-2774-5913
Eyyüp Garip(KAFKAS UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0009-0003-7856-7672
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The higher frequency of baseline arthritis among seronegative patients supports recent evidence challenging the traditional view of seronegative RA as a uniformly milder form of the disease and highlights the clinical heterogeneity of RA according to serological status.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are increasingly recognized as clinically and biologically distinct disease subsets, yet comparative real-world data remain limited.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This retrospective, single-center study included 559 patients with RA followed between September 2023 and May 2025.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The higher frequency of baseline arthritis among seronegative patients supports recent evidence challenging the traditional view of seronegative RA as a uniformly milder form of the disease and highlights the clinical heterogeneity of RA according to serological status.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Rheumatoid arthritis · seropositive rheumatoid arthritis · seronegative rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

Seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are increasingly recognized as clinically and biologically distinct disease subsets, yet comparative real-world data remain limited. We aimed to compare the sociodemographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment characteristics of patients with seropositive and seronegative RA. This retrospective, single-center study included 559 patients with RA followed between September 2023 and May 2025. Seropositivity was defined as rheumatoid factor and/or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) positivity. Sociodemographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment characteristics were compared between seropositive and seronegative patients. Of 559 patients, 446 (79.8%) were seropositive and 113 (20.2%) were seronegative. Disease duration was significantly longer in seropositive patients (p<0.001). At baseline, arthritis was more frequent in seronegative patients (p=0.019), whereas white blood cell count (WBC) and neutrophil counts were higher in seropositive patients (p=0.001 and p=0.006, respectively). Baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) levels did not differ between groups (p=0.261), whereas CRP levels at the last follow-up were higher in seropositive patients (p=0.035). CRP levels were significantly lower at the last follow-up than at baseline in both groups (p<0.001 for both). Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) use at the last follow-up was more frequent among seropositive patients (p=0.023). Seropositive and seronegative RA differed in several clinical, laboratory, and treatment characteristics. The higher frequency of baseline arthritis among seronegative patients supports recent evidence challenging the traditional view of seronegative RA as a uniformly milder form of the disease and highlights the clinical heterogeneity of RA according to serological status.

🔖

Cite This Article

Lermi, N., Garip, E. (2026). Clinical, Laboratory, and Treatment Characteristics of Seropositive and Seronegative Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Real-World Cohort Study. New Trends in Medicine Sciences, Volume: 7 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.56766/ntms.2038514

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Di Matteo A, Bathon JM, Emery P. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2023;402(10416):2019-33.
  2. Díaz-González F, Hernández-Hernández MV. Rheumatoid arthritis. Med Clin (Barc). 2023;161(12):533-42.
  3. Jin Y, Liu J, Desai RJ, Kim SC. Real-world treatment effectiveness of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs by serostatus among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2023;5(11):571-80.
  4. Nordberg LB, Lillegraven S, Aga AB, et al. Comparing the disease course of patients with seronegative and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis fulfilling the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in a treat-to-target setting: 2-year data from the ARCTIC trial. RMD Open. 2018;4(2):e000752.
  5. Choi S, Lee KH. Clinical management of seronegative and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis: A comparative study. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0195550. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195550.
  6. De Stefano L, Bugatti S, Mazzucchelli I, et al. Synovial and serum B cell signature of autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis vs autoantibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024;63(5):1322-31.
  7. Carbonell-Bobadilla N, Soto-Fajardo C, Amezcua-Guerra LM, et al. Patients with seronegative rheumatoid arthritis have a different phenotype than seropositive patients: A clinical and ultrasound study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:978351.
  8. De Stefano L, D'Onofrio B, Gandolfo S, et al. Seronegative rheumatoid arthritis: One year in review 2023. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2023;41(3):554-64.
  9. Matthijssen XME, Niemantsverdriet E, Huizinga TWJ, van der Helm-van Mil AHM. Enhanced treatment strategies and distinct disease outcomes among autoantibody-positive and -negative rheumatoid arthritis patients over 25 years: A longitudinal cohort study in the Netherlands. PLoS Med. 2020;17(9):e1003296.
  10. Özsoy Z, Germe ŞA, Ayan G, Uzun GS, Ekici M, Ünaldı E, et al. Comparison of seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis patients using or about to be initiated with biological DMARDs. Ulus Romatol Derg. 2025;17(1):53-59.
  11. Mo Q, Wang M, Cai S, et al. A comparative study on the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging features between seronegative and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2024;42(1):77-85.
  12. Bird P, Hall S, Nash P, et al. Treatment outcomes in patients with seropositive versus seronegative rheumatoid arthritis in phase III randomised clinical trials of tofacitinib. RMD Open. 2019;5(1):e000742.