Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 6

Patterns of periapical radiography use during pediatric dental treatment under general anesthesia: a retrospective study

Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The findings provide descriptive information on periapical radiography use during pediatric dental treatment under general anesthesia and may help inform future operating-room radiography protocols consistent with ALADAIP principles.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and distribution of periapical radiography during comprehensive dental treatment under general anesthesia in pediatric patients and to discuss the findings within the framework of the as low as diagnostically acceptable, being indication-oriented and patient-specific (ALADAIP) principle.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective study included 378 children (3-17 years) who underwent dental treatment under general anesthesia between 2020 and 2024.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The findings provide descriptive information on periapical radiography use during pediatric dental treatment under general anesthesia and may help inform future operating-room radiography protocols consistent with ALADAIP principles.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:General anesthesia · pediatric dentistry · periapical radiography

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and distribution of periapical radiography during comprehensive dental treatment under general anesthesia in pediatric patients and to discuss the findings within the framework of the as low as diagnostically acceptable, being indication-oriented and patient-specific (ALADAIP) principle. Methods: This retrospective study included 378 children (3-17 years) who underwent dental treatment under general anesthesia between 2020 and 2024. Demographic and clinical data and the number of periapical radiographs were retrieved from institutional records and analyzed across three age groups. Since the radiograph counts were not normally distributed, the three age groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis H test, followed by Dunn’s post hoc test with Bonferroni adjustment. Eta-squared based on the Kruskal-Wallis H statistic (η²H) was calculated as the omnibus effect size. Results: Among 378 children (mean age, 6.72±2.53 years), the mean number of periapical radiographs was 4.27±1.40 per patient. Healthy but noncooperative children represented 49.4% of the participants, while 33.8% had systemic diseases or allergies. The distribution of periapical radiograph counts differed significantly among the age groups [Kruskal-Wallis H (2)=6.364, p=0.042, η²H=0.012]. Dunn’s post hoc test with Bonferroni adjustment identified a significant difference between the 3-6-year and 7-12-year groups (adjusted p=0.035), whereas the other pairwise comparisons were not significant. The median number of radiographs was 4 in all three groups. Conclusion: The findings provide descriptive information on periapical radiography use during pediatric dental treatment under general anesthesia and may help inform future operating-room radiography protocols consistent with ALADAIP principles.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akleyin, E., Katı, E., Özata, M. Y. (2026). Patterns of periapical radiography use during pediatric dental treatment under general anesthesia: a retrospective study. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 6. https://ajindex.com/articles/1668032

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Alsalleeh F, Albishry FY, Aleyiydi AS, et al. Outcomes of nonsurgical endodontic treatment under general anesthesia in special health care needs: an observational study. BDJ Open. 2024;10(1):36. doi:10.1038/s41405-024-00224-5
  2. White SC, Scarfe WC, Schulze RK, et al. The image gently in dentistry campaign: promotion of responsible use of maxillofacial radiology in dentistry for children. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;118(3):257-261. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2014.06.001
  3. Oenning AC, Jacobs R, Pauwels R, et al. Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr Radiol. 2018; 48(3):308-316. doi:10.1007/s00247-017-4012-9
  4. Kühnisch J, Anttonen V, Duggal MS, et al. Best clinical practice guidance for prescribing dental radiographs in children and adolescents: an EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020;21(4):375-386. doi:10.1007/s40368-019-00493-x
  5. Aps JKM. Radiography in pediatric dental practice. Clin Dent Rev. 2020; 4(1):5. doi:10.1007/s41894-019-0067-3
  6. Aps JKM, Lim LZ, Tong HJ, Kalia B, Chou AM. Diagnostic efficacy of and indications for intraoral radiographs in pediatric dentistry: a systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020;21(4):429-462. doi:10.1007/s40368-020-00532-y
  7. Ridao-Sacie C, Segura-Egea JJ, Fernández-Palacín A, Bullón-Fernández P, Ríos-Santos JV. Radiological assessment of periapical status using the Periapical Index: comparison of periapical radiography and digital panoramic radiography. Int Endod J. 2007;40(6):433-440. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01233.x
  8. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on use of anesthesia personnel in the administration of office-based deep sedation/general anesthesia to the pediatric dental patient. Pediatr Dent. 2012;34(6):170-172.
  9. Ferrari LR, Leahy I, Staffa SJ, Berry JG. The pediatric-specific American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score: a multicenter study. Anesth Analg. 2021;132(3):807-817. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000005025
  10. Johnson KB, Ludlow JB. Intraoral radiographs: a comparison of dose and risk reduction with collimation and thyroid shielding. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020;151(10):726-734. doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2020.06.019
  11. Rehani MM, Brady Z. Contemporary issues in radiation protection in medical imaging: introductory editorial. Br J Radiol. 2021;94(1126):20219004. doi:10.1259/bjr.20219004
  12. Granlund C, Thilander-Klang A, Ylhan B, Lofthag-Hansen S, Ekestubbe A. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1066):20151052. doi:10.1259/bjr.20151052
  13. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2009. Report No. 160.
  14. McCollough CH, Bushberg JT, Fletcher JG, Eckel LJ. Answers to common questions about the use and safety of CT scans. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(10):1380-1392. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.07.011
  15. Jerrold L. Seeing before doing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 146(4):530-533. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.008
  16. International Atomic Energy Agency. Justification of medical exposure in diagnostic imaging. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2011.
  17. Granata C, Sofia C, Francavilla M, et al. Let’s talk about radiation dose and radiation protection in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2025;55(3):386-396. doi:10.1007/s00247-024-06009-0
  18. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4): 1-332. doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003
  19. Garg T, Shrigiriwar A. Radiation protection in interventional radiology. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2021;31(4):939-945. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1741049
  20. Geist JR. Handheld intraoral dental X-Ray devices should supplement but not replace conventional radiographic equipment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2021;132(3):257-259. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2021.06.001
  21. Vazquez L, Muresan A, Zarauz C. Impact of rectangular collimation on quality of intraoral radiographs: findings from a clinical audit at a dental practice. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025;15(7):911. doi:10.3390/diagnostics15070911
  22. International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation protection in dental radiology. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2022. Safety Reports Series No. 108.
  23. Lurie AG, Kantor ML. Contemporary radiation protection in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020;151(10):716-719. doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2020.05.007
  24. Kumar TP, Azmi R, Premkumar A, et al. Radiation safety protocol in dentistry: a neglected practice. J Orofac Sci. 2018;10(1):24-30. doi:10.4103/jofs.jofs_77_17
  25. Madan K, Baliga S, Thosar N, Rathi N. Recent advances in dental radiography for pediatric patients: a review. J Med Radiol Pathol Surg. 2015;1(2):21-25. doi:10.15713/ins.jmrps.11
  26. Al-Mousa DS, Alakhras M, AlSa’di AG, Chau M, Hayre C, Mahasneh AM. Attitudes and practices of radiation protection among Jordanian dental radiography practitioners. Radiography (Lond). 2024;30(6):1556-1562. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2024.09.061
  27. Sadeghi S, Saeidi N, Salehi A, et al. Advances in radiation protection in oral and dental radiology: pragmatic approaches and recent innovations. Front Biomed Technol. 2025;12(1):166-178. doi:10.18502/fbt.v12i1.17745